Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Economics for a creative world

  • ROGER KOPPL (a1), STUART KAUFFMAN (a2), TEPPO FELIN (a3) and GIUSEPPE LONGO (a4)
Abstract
Abstract

Drawing on current biology, we argue that the phase space of economic evolution is not stable. Thus, there are no entailing laws of economic dynamics. In this sense, economic dynamics are creative and the economy is not a causal system. Because economic dynamics are creative, the implicit frame of analysis for the econosphere changes in unprestatable and non-algorithmic ways. New-venture, social, and political entrepreneurs solve the frame problem of the econosphere. Economic evolution is unpredictable, not entailed, and the number of things traded (‘cambiodiversity’) increases over time. Our metatheoretic framework points out how institutions, entrepreneurs, and disparate actors enable what we call ‘novelty intermediation’. We provide examples of novelty intermediation from Rennaissance Italy to Silicon Valley. Our framework does not automatically provide clear policy prescriptions in part because our main result is negative. It may nevertheless provide a useful prolegomenon to a future economics fit for a creative world.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Economics for a creative world
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Economics for a creative world
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Economics for a creative world
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: rkoppl@syr.edu
**Email: stukauffman@gmail.com
***Email: teppo.felin@sbs.ox.ac.uk
****Email: Giuseppe.Longo@ens.fr
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

K. Arrow and G. Debreu (1954), ‘Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy’, Econometrica, 22: 265290.

Y. Balasko and J. Geanakoplos (2012), ‘Introduction to General Equilibrium’, Journal of Economic Theory, 147: 400406.

J. R. Banker (1991), ‘The Program for the Sassetta Altarpiece in the Church of S. Francisco in Borgo S. Sepolcro’, I Tatti Studies in the Italian Renaissance, 4: 1158.

W. J. Baumol (1990), ‘Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive’, The Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5): 893921.

R. Blundell and T. M. Stoker (2005), ‘Heterogeneity and Aggregation’, Journal of Economic Literature, 43: 347391.

D. T. Campbell (1960), ‘Blind Variation and Selective Retention in Creative Thought as in Other Knowledge Processes’, Psychological Review, 67 (6): 380400.

A. J. Cohen and G. C. Harcourt (2003), ‘Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies?’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17 (1): 199214.

D. Colander , R. P. F. Holt , and J. B. Rosser , Jr . (2004), The Changing Face of Economics: Conversations with Cutting Edge Economists, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

A. Croce , J. Martí , and S. Murtinu (2013), ‘The Impact of Venture Capital on the Productivity Growth of European Entrepreneurial Firms: ‘Screening’ or ‘Value Added’ Effect?’, Journal of Business Venturing, 28: 489510.

A. T. Denzau and D. C. North (1994), ‘Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions’, Kyklos, 47 (1): 113.

S. Durlauf (2012), ‘Complexity, Economics and Public Policy’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 11: 4575.

P. E. Earl and J. Potts (2004), ‘The Market for Preferences’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28: 619633.

J. Felipe and F. M. Fisher (2003), ‘Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists should Know’, Metroeconomica, 54 (2/3): 208262.

T. Felin and T. Zenger (2009), ‘Entrepreneurs as theorist: On the origins of collective beliefs and novel strategies’, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3: 127146.

R. Florida and M. Kenney (1988), ‘Venture Capital and High Technology Entrepreneurship’, Journal of Business Venturing, 3: 301319.

V. Foley , S. Rowley , D. F. Cassidy , and F. C. Logan (1983), ‘Leonardo, the Wheel Lock, and the Milling Process’, Technology and Culture, 24 (3): 399427.

C. Gilbert (1998), ‘What Did the Renaissance Patron Buy?’, Renaissance Quarterly, 51 (2): 392450.

S. J. Gould (1998), Leonardo's Mountain of Clams and the Diet of Worms, New York, NY: Harmony Books.

D. Harper and P. Lewis (2012), ‘New Perspectives on Emergence in Economics’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Economics, 82: 329337.

F. A. Hayek (1978), New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

C. A. Hidalgo , B. Klinger , A. L. Barabási , and R. Hausmann (2007), ‘The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations’, Science, 317: 482487.

G. Hodgson (2001), How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science, London: Routledge.

G. Hodgson and T. Knudsen (2010), Darwin's Conjecture: The Search for General Principles of Social and Economic Evolution, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

J. James (1992), ‘Evidence for Flying Buttresses before 1180’, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 51 (3): 261287.

A. P. Kirman (1992), ‘Whom or What does the Representative Individual Represent?’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6 (2): 117136.

R. Koppl (2002), Big Players and the Economic Theory of Expectations, London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

R. Koppl and R. N. Langlois (2001), ‘Organizations and Language Games’, Journal of Management and Governance, 5: 287305.

N. E. Land (2005), ‘Apelles and the Origin of Giotto's O’, Source Notes in the History of Art, 25 (1): 69.

P. O. Long (1997), ‘Power, Patronage, and the Authorship of Ars: From Mechanical Know-How to Mechanical Knowledge in the Last Scribal Age’, Isis, 88 (1): 141.

G. Longo and M. Montévil (2014), Perspectives on Organisms: Biological Time, Symmetries and Singularities, Berlin: Springer.

M. Minniti (2004), ‘Entrepreneurial Alertness and Asymmetric Information in a Spin-Glass Model’, Journal of Business Venturing, 19: 637658.

M. D. Mumford (2003), ‘Where have We been, Where are We Going? Taking Stock in Creativity Research’, Creativity Research Journal, 15 (2–3): 107120.

J. Potts (2012), ‘Novelty-Bundling Markets’, in David E. Andersson (ed.), The Spatial Market Process, Advances in Austrian Economics, vol. 16, Bradford: Emerald Publishing Group.

J. L. Tang , B. Y. Liu , and K. W. Ma . (2008), ‘Traditional Chinese Medicine’, The Lancet, 372: 19381940.

U. Witt (2009), ‘Novelty and the Bounds of Unknowledge in Economics’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 16 (4): 361375.

D. H. Wolpert (2001), ‘Computational Capabilities of Physical Systems’, Physical Review E, 65: 016128(127).

A. A. Young (1928), ‘Increasing Returns and Economic Progress’, Economic Journal, 38 (152): 527542.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 83
Total number of PDF views: 408 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1003 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.