Skip to main content

From fictions and aggregates to real entities in the theory of the firm


According to the dominant ‘nexus of contracts’ and ‘collection of assets’ views of the firm, the firm is a either a fiction or an aggregate. Although legal personality is important in both accounts, everything is said to be achieved by private contract alone and the law's role in creating legal entity status is dismissed. The paper challenges both these aspects by reconsidering an alternative ‘real entity theory’ that dominated debates at the turn of the twentieth century. This forgotten view holds that the firm is neither a fiction nor an aggregate but a real entity, and underlines the creation of legal entity status as a fundamental role of the law. The paper discusses this view's ontological and legal insights, clarifies the proposition that the firm is a real entity, and proposes it as a starting point for a theory of the firm.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Alchian, Armen A. (1984), ‘Specificity, Specialization and Coalitions’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 140 (1): 3449.
Alchian, Armen A. and Demsetz, Harold (1972), ‘Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization’, American Economic Review, 62 (5): 777795.
Alchian, Armen A. and Woodward, Susan (1988), ‘The Firm Is Dead; Long Live the Firm: A Review of Oliver E. Williamson's The Economic Institutions of Capitalism’, Journal of Economic Literature, 26 (1): 6579.
Aristotle, Metaphysics, in McKeon, Richard (2001) (ed.), The Basic Works of Aristotle, New York: Modern Library.
Avi-Yonah, Reuven S. (2005), ‘The Cyclical Transformations of the Corporate Form: A Historical Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility’, Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 30 (3): 767818.
Baker, Lynne R. (2004), ‘The Ontology of Artifacts’, Philosophical Explorations, 7 (2): 99111.
Barzel, Yoram (1989), Economic Analysis of Property Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berle, Adolf A. (1947), ‘The Theory of Enterprise Entity’, Columbia Law Review, 47 (3): 343358.
Berle, Adolf A. and Means, Gardiner C. (1932), The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Biondi, Yuri (2007), ‘Accounting and the Economic Nature of the Firm as an Entity’, in Biondi, Yuri, Canziani, Arnaldo, and Kirat, Thierry (eds), The Firm as an Entity: Implications for Economics, Accounting and the Law, London and New York: Routledge.
Blackwell, Thomas F. (1999), ‘The Revolution is Here: The Promise of a Unified Business Entity Code’, Journal of Corporation Law, 24 (2): 333378.
Blair, Margaret M. (1999), ‘Firm-Specific Human Capital and Theories of the Firm’, in Blair, Margaret M. and Roe, Mark J. (eds), Employees and Corporate Governance, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Blair, Margaret M. (2003), ‘Locking-In Capital: What Corporate Law Achieved for Business Organizers in the Nineteenth Century’, UCLA Law Review, 51 (2): 387455.
Blair, Margaret M. (2004), ‘The Neglected Benefits of the Corporate Form: Entity Status and the Separation of Asset Ownership from Control’, in Grandori, Anna (ed.), Corporate Governance and Firm Organization: Microfoundations and Structural Forms, New York: Oxford University Press.
Blumberg, Phillip I. (1990), ‘The Corporate Personality in American Law: A Summary Review’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 38 (S): 4969.
Blumberg, Phillip I. (1993), The Multinational Challenge to Corporation Law: The Search for a New Corporate Personality, New York: Oxford University Press.
Bratton, William W. (1989a), ‘The “Nexus-of-Contracts” Corporation: A Critical Appraisal’, Cornell Law Review, 74 (2): 407465.
Bratton, William W. (1989b), ‘The New Economic Theory of the Firm: Critical Perspectives from History’, Stanford Law Review, 41 (6): 14711527.
Brown, W. Jethro (1905), ‘The Personality of the Corporation and the State’, Law Quarterly Review, 21 (4): 365379.
Bunge, Mario (2003), Emergence and Convergence: Qualitative Novelty and the Unity of Knowledge, Toronto: Toronto University Press.
Bunge, Mario (2006), Chasing Reality: Strife over Realism, Toronto: Toronto University Press.
Butler, Henry N. (1989), ‘The Contractual Theory of the Corporation’, George Mason University Law Review, 11 (4): 99123.
Cheung, Steven N. S. (1983), ‘The Contractual Nature of the Firm’, Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (1): 121.
Coase, Ronald H. (1937), ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica, 4 (16): 386405.
Cohen, Felix S. (1935), ‘Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach’, Columbia Law Review, 35 (6): 809849.
Commons, John R. (1924), Legal Foundations of Capitalism, New York: Macmillan.
Copp, David (1979), ‘Collective Actions and Secondary Actions’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 24 (4): 177186.
Copp, David (1984), ‘What Collectives Are: Agency, Individualism and Legal Theory’, Dialogue, 23 (2): 249269.
Davis, John B. (2003), The Theory of the Individual in Economics: Identity and Value, London and New York: Routledge.
Dejnožka, Jan (2003), The Ontology of the Analytic Tradition and Its Origins: Realism and Identity in Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein and Quine, 2nd edition, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Dejnožka, Jan (2006), Corporate Entity, unpublished book manuscript (available online at
Demsetz, Harold (1988), ‘The Theory of the Firm Revisited’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 4 (1): 141161.
Dewey, John (1925), Experience and Nature, Chicago: Open Court.
Dewey, John (1926), ‘The Historic Background of Corporate Legal Personality’, Yale Law Journal, 35 (6): 655673.
Dicey, Albert V. (1905), Lectures on the Relation between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century, London: Macmillan.
Dix, Maurice J. (1953), ‘The Economic Entity’, Fordham Law Review, 22 (3): 254273.
Dodd, E. Merrick (1932), ‘For Whom Are Corporate Managers Trustees?’, Harvard Law Review, 45 (7): 11451163.
Easterbrook, Frank H. and Fischel, Daniel R. (1985), ‘Limited Liability and the Corporation’, University of Chicago Law Review, 52 (1): 89117.
Easterbrook, Frank H. and Fischel, Daniel R. (1991), The Economic Structure of Corporate Law, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Elder-Vass, Dave (2005), ‘Emergence and the Realist Account of Cause’, Journal of Critical Realism, 4 (2): 315338.
Fama, Eugene F. (1980), ‘Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm’, Journal of Political Economy, 88 (2): 288307.
Fama, Eugene F. and Jensen, Michael C. (1983), ‘Separation of Ownership and Control’, Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (2): 301325.
French, Peter A. (1982), ‘Crowds and Corporations’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 19 (3): 271277.
Freund, Ernst (1897), The Legal Nature of Corporations, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Gierke, Otto von (1900), Political Theories of the Middle Age, translated with an introduction by Maitland, Frederick W., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gindis, David (2007), ‘Some Building Blocks for a Theory of the Firm as a Real Entity’, in Biondi, Yuri, Canziani, Arnaldo, and Kirat, Thierry (eds), The Firm as an Entity: Implications for Economics, Accounting and the Law, London and New York: Routledge.
Goldstein, Jeffrey (1999), ‘Emergence as a Construct: History and Issues’, Emergence, 1 (1): 4972.
Grossman, Sanford and Hart, Oliver D. (1986), ‘The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration’, Journal of Political Economy, 94 (2): 691719.
Hager, Mark M. ((1989)), ‘Bodies Politic: The Progressive History of Organizational “Real Entity” Theory’, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 50 (3): 575654.
Hansmann, Henry and Kraakman, Reinier (2000), ‘The Essential Role of Organizational Law’, Yale Law Journal, 110 (3): 387440.
Hansmann, Henry, Kraakman, Reinier, and Squire, Richard (2005), ‘The New Business Entities in Evolutionary Perspective’, University of Illinois Law Review (February): 5–14.
Hansmann, Henry, Kraakman, Reinier, and Squire, Richard (2006), ‘Law and the Rise of the Firm’, Harvard Law Review, 119 (5): 13331403.
Harré, Rom and Madden, Edward H. (1975), Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Harris, Ron (2006), ‘The Transplantation of the Legal Discourse on Corporate Personality Theories: From German Codification to British Political Pluralism and American Big Business’, Washington and Lee Law Review, 63 (4): 14211478.
Hart, Oliver D. (1989), ‘An Economist's Perspective on the Theory of the Firm’, Columbia Law Review, 89 (7): 17571774.
Hart, Oliver D. (1995), Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure, New York: Oxford University Press.
Hart, Oliver D. and Moore, John (1990), ‘Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm’, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (6): 11191158.
Hessen, Robert (1979), ‘A New Concept of Corporations: A Contractual and Private Property Model’, Hastings Law Journal, 30 (5): 13271350.
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (2002), ‘The Legal Nature of the Firm and the Myth of the Firm-Market Hybrid’, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 9 (1): 3660.
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (2003), ‘The Hidden Persuaders: Institutions and Individuals in Economic Theory’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27 (2): 159175.
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (2004), On the Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism, London and New York: Routledge.
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. and Knudsen, Thorbjørn (2004), ‘The Firm as an Interactor: Firms as Vehicles for Habits and Routines’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14 (2): 281307.
Horwitz, Morton J. (1992), The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy, New York: Oxford University Press.
Humphreys, Paul (1997), ‘Emergence, Not Supervenience’, Philosophy of Science, 64 (S): S337S345.
Iacobucci, Edward M. and Triantis, George G. (2007), ‘Economic and Legal Boundaries of the Firm’, Virginia Law Review, 93 (3): 515570.
Iwai, Katsuhito (1999), ‘Persons, Things and Corporations: The Corporate Personality Controversy and Comparative Corporate Governance’, American Journal of Corporation Law, 47 (4): 583632.
Jensen, Michael C. and Meckling, William H. (1976), ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Capital Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4): 305360.
Jhering, Rudolf (1852) Der Geist des römischen Rechts, Leipzig: Auflage.
Khalil, Elias L. (1997), ‘Is the Firm an Individual?’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21 (4): 519544.
Kim, Jaegwon (2006), ‘Emergence: Core Ideas and Issues’, Synthese, 151 (3): 547559.
Klein, William A. and Coffee, John C. (2002), Business Organization and Finance: Legal and Economic Principles, 8th edition, New York: Foundation Press.
Lamoreaux, Naomi R. (1998), ‘Partnerships, Corporations and the Theory of the Firm’, American Economic Review, 88 (2): 6671.
Laski, Harold J. (1916), ‘The Personality of Associations’, Harvard Law Review, 29 (4): 404426.
Lawson, Tony (1997), Economics and Reality, London and New York: Routledge.
Leibniz, Gottfried W. (1902) [1687], Correspondence with Arnauld, in McCormack, Thomas J. (ed.), Leibniz: Basic Writings, La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Lowe, Jonathan E. (2003), ‘Identity, Individuality and Unity’, Philosophy, 78 (3): 321336.
Machen, Arthur W. (1911), ‘Corporate Personality’, Harvard Law Review, 24 (4): 253267.
Mahoney, Paul G. (2000), ‘Contract or Concession? An Essay on the History of Corporate Law’, Georgia Law Review, 34 (2): 873893.
Maitland, Frederick W. (1900), ‘The Corporation Sole’, Law Quarterly Review, 16 (4): 335354.
Maitland, Frederick W. (1905), ‘Moral Personality and Legal Personality’, Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation, 6 (2): 192200.
Mäki, Uskali (2001), ‘The Way the World Works (www): Towards an Ontology of Theory Choice’, in Mäki, Uskali (ed.), The Economic World View: Studies in the Ontology of Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mark, Gregory A. (1987), ‘The Personification of the Business Corporation in American Law’, University of Chicago Law Review, 54 (4): 14411483.
Masten, Scott E. (1988), ‘A Legal Basis for the Firm’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 4 (1): 181198.
Millon, David (1990), ‘Theories of the Corporation’, Duke Law Journal, 1990 (2): 201262.
Molnar, George (2003), Powers: A Study in Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moore, John (1992), ‘The Firm as a Collection of Assets’, European Economic Review, 36 (2–3): 493507.
Naffine, Ngaire (2003), ‘Who are Law's Persons? From Cheshire Cats to Responsible Subjects’, Modern Law Review, 66 (3): 346367.
Nelson, Richard R. and Winter, Sidney G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Orts, Eric W. (1998), ‘Shirking and Sharking: A Legal Theory of the Firm’, Yale Law and Policy Review, 16 (2): 254329.
Orts, Eric W. (forthcoming), Rethinking the Firm: Theories of the Business Enterprise, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Penrose, Edith T. (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Pettit, Philip (2002), ‘Collective Persons and Powers’, Legal Theory, 8 (4): 443470.
Phillips, Michael J. (1994), ‘Reappraising the Real Entity Theory of the Corporation’, Florida State University Law Review, 21 (4): 10611123.
Plato, Sophist, in Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington (1980) (eds), Plato: The Collected Dialogues, 10th edition, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Quine, Willard V. O. (1969), Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York: Columbia University Press.
Radin, Max (1932), ‘The Endless Problem of Corporate Personality’, Columbia Law Review, 32 (4): 643667.
Ribstein, Larry E. (2006), ‘Should History Lock In Lock-In?’, Tulsa Law Review, 41 (3): 523539.
Rowley, Scott (1931), ‘The Individuality of Business Associations’, Virginia Law Review, 17 (6): 557569.
Savigny, Friedrich C. (1841), System des heutigen Römischen Rechts, vol. 2, Berlin: Veit.
Searle, John R. (2005), ‘What Is an Institution?’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 1 (1): 122.
Simon, Herbert A. (1991), ‘Organizations and Markets’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (2): 2544.
Singleton, W. E. (1912), ‘Entities and Real and Artificial Persons’, Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation, 12 (2): 291298.
Stauss, James H. (1944), ‘The Entrepreneur: The Firm’, Journal of Political Economy, 52 (2): 112127.
Stout, Lynn A. (2005), ‘The Nature of Corporations’, University of Illinois Law Review, 2005 (1): 253267.
Thomasson, Amie L. (2003), ‘Realism and Human Kinds’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67 (3): 580609.
Vanberg, Viktor J. (1992), ‘Organizations as Constitutional Systems’, Constitutional Political Economy, 3 (3): 223253.
Vinogradoff, Paul (1924), ‘Juridical Persons’, Columbia Law Review, 24 (6): 594604.
Weissman, David (2000), A Social Ontology, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Williamson, Oliver E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: Free Press.
Wimsatt, William C. (1997), ‘Aggregativity: Reductive Heuristics for Finding Emergence’, Philosophy of Science, 54 (S): S372S384.
Winter, Sidney G. (1988), ‘On Coase, Competence and the Corporation’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 4 (1): 163180.
Wormser, I. Maurice (1912), ‘Piercing the Veil of Corporate Entity’, Columbia Law Review, 12 (6): 496518.
Zingales, Luigi (2000), ‘In Search of New Foundations’, Journal of Finance, 55 (4): 16231653.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 19
Total number of PDF views: 141 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 407 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.