Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Garbage in, garbage out? Some micro sources of macro errors

  • CASS R. SUNSTEIN (a1) and REID HASTIE (a2)

Many institutions, large or small, make their decisions through some process of deliberation. Nonetheless, deliberating institutions often fail, in the sense that they make judgments that are false or that fail to take advantage of the information that their members have. Micro mistakes can lead to macro blunders or even catastrophes. There are four such failures; all of them have implication for large-scale institutions as well as small ones. (1) Sometimes the predeliberation errors of an institution's members are amplified, not merely propagated, as a result of deliberation. (2) Institutions fall victim to cascade effects, as the initial speakers or actors are followed by their successors, who do not disclose what they know. Non-disclosure, on the part of those successors, may be a product of either informational or reputational cascades. (3) As a result of group polarization, deliberating institutions sometimes end up in a more extreme position in line with their predeliberation tendencies. Sometimes group polarization leads in desirable directions, but there is no assurance to this effect. (4) In deliberating institutions, shared information often dominates or crowds out unshared information, ensuring that institutions do not learn what their members know. Informational signals and reputational pressure help to explain all four errors. The results can be harmful to numerous institutions, including large ones, and to societies as a whole. Markets are able to correct some of these problems, but cascade effects occur there as well.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Abele S., Stasser G., and Vaughan-Parsons S. (2005), ‘Information Sharing, Cognitive Centrality, and Influence among Business Executives during Collective Choice’, (Accessed 9 December, 2013).
Armstrong J. (2001), ‘Combining Forecasts’, in Armstrong J. (ed.), Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners, Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Baron R. S., Hoppe S. I., Kao C. F., Brunsman B., Linneweh B., and Rogers D. (1996), ‘Social Corroboration and Opinion Extremity’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32 (6): 537560.
Brown R. (1986), Social Psychology: The Second Edition, New York: Free Press.
Christenson C. and Abbott A. (2000), ‘Team Medical Decision Making’, in Chapman G. and Sonnenberg F. (eds.), Decision Making in Health Care, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dechêne A., Stahl C., Hansen J., and Wänke M. (2010), ‘The Truth About the Truth: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Truth Effect’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14 (2): 238257.
Gigone D. and Hastie R. (1993), ‘The Common Knowledge Effect: Information Sharing and Group Judgment’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (5): 959.
Gigone D. and Hastie R. (1997), ‘Proper Analysis of the Accuracy of Group Judgments’, Psychological Bulletin, 121 (1): 149.
Gilovich T., Griffin D., and Kahneman D. (eds.) (2002), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Glaeser E. L. and Sunstein C. R. (2009), ‘Extremism and Social Learning’, Journal of Legal Analysis, 1 (1): 263324.
Hastie R. (1986), ‘Experimental Evidence of Group Accuracy’, in Grofman B. and Owen G. (eds.), Information Pooling and Group Decision Making, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, p. 129.
Heath C. and Gonzalez R. (1995), ‘Interaction with Others Increases Decision Confidence but Not Decision Quality: Evidence Against Information Collection Views of Interactive Decision Making’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61 (3): 305326.
Hightower R. and Sayeed L. (1995), ‘The Impact of Computer-Mediated Communication Systems on Biased Group Discussion’, Computers in Human Behavior, 11 (1): 3344.
Hirshleifer D. (1995), ‘The Blind Leading the Blind: Social Influence, Fads and Informational Cascades’, in Tommasi M. and Ierulli K. (eds.), The New Economics of Human Behaviour, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Irwin J. R. and Davis J. H. (1995), ‘Choice/Matching Preference Reversals in Groups: Consensus Processes and Justification-Based Reasoning’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64 (3): 325339.
Janis I. L. (1983), Groupthink, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, pp. 213.
Johnson D. D. (2009), Overconfidence and War: The Havoc and Glory of Positive Illusions, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kameda T., Ohtsubo Y., and Takezawa M. (1997), ‘Centrality in Sociocognitive Networks and Social Influence: An Illustration in a Group Decision-Making Context’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73 (2): 296.
Kerr N. L., MacCoun R. J., and Kramer G. P. (1996), ‘Bias in Judgment: Comparing Individuals and Groups’, Psychological Review, 103 (4): 687.
Kuran T. and Sunstein C. R. (1999), ‘Availability Cascades and Risk Regulation’, Stanford Law Review, 51 (4): 683768.
MacCoun R. J. (2002), ‘Comparing Micro and Macro Rationality’, in Gowda R. and Fox J. (eds.), Judgments, Decisions, and Public Policy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Moscovici S. and Zavalloni M. (1969), ‘The Group as a Polarizer of Attitudes’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12 (2): 125.
Mowen J. C. and Gentry J. W. (1980), ‘Investigation of the Preference-Reversal Phenomenon in a New Product Introduction Task’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 65 (6): 715.
Ridgeway C. L. (2001), ‘Social Status and Group Structure’, Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes, 352375. Available at:
Rozin P. and Nemeroff C. (2002), ‘Sympathetic Magical Thinking: The Contagion and Similarity “Heuristics”’, in Gilovich T., Griffin D. and Kahneman A. (eds.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schkade D., Sunstein C. R., and Kahneman D. (2000), ‘Deliberating About Dollars: The Severity Shift’, Columbia Law Review, 100 (4): 11391175.
Schelling T. (2006), Micromotives and Macrobehavior, New York: W.W. Norton.
Schumann E. L. and Thompson W. C. (1989), ‘Effects of Attorney's Arguments on Jurors’ Use of Statistical Evidence’. Unpublished manuscript.
Shiller R. (2004), The New Financial Order, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shiller R. (2006), Irrational Exuberance, New York: Crown Business.
Slovic P. E. (2000), The Perception of Risk, New York: Earthscan Publications.
Sniezek J. A. and Henry R. A. (1989), ‘Accuracy and Confidence in Group Judgment’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43 (1): 128.
Stahlberg D., Eller F., Maass A., and Frey D. (1995), ‘We Knew it All Along: Hindsight Bias in Groups’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63 (1): 4658.
Stasser G. and Dietz-Uhler B. (2001), ‘Collective Choice, Judgment, and Problem Solving’, Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes, 3: 3155.
Stasser G., Taylor L. A., and Hanna C. (1989), ‘Information Sampling in Structured and Unstructured Discussions of Three-And Six-Person Groups’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (1): 67.
Stasser G. and Titus W. (1985), ‘Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (6): 1467.
Stasser G. and Titus W. (2003), ‘Hidden Profiles: A Brief History’, Psychological Inquiry, 14 (3–4): 304313.
Stasson M. F., Ono K., Zimmerman S. K., and Davis J. H. (1988), ‘Group Consensus Processes on Cognitive Bias Tasks: A Social Decision Scheme Approach’, Japanese Psychological Research, 30 (2): 68.
Sunstein C. R. (2003), Why Societies Need Dissent, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sunstein C. R. (ed.) (2006), Are Judges Political?[Electronic Resource]: An Empirical Analysis of the Federal Judiciary, Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Tahler R. and Sunstein C. R. (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Terwiesch C. and Ulrich K. T. (2009), Innovation Tournaments: Creating and Selecting Exceptional Opportunities, Cambridge: Harvard Business Press.
Tversky A. and Kahneman D. (1973), ‘Availability: A Heuristic For Judging Frequency and Probability’, Cognitive Psychology, 5 (2): 207232.
Tversky A. and Kahneman D. (1982), ‘Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biase’, in Kahneman D., Slovic P., and Tversky A. (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wallace P. (2001), The Psychology of the Internet, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Watts D. (2011), Everything Is Obvious, New York: Crown Business.
Whyte G. (1986), ‘Escalating commitment to a course of action: A reinterpretation’, Academy of Management Review, 11 (2): 311321.
Whyte G. (1993), ‘Escalating Commitment in Individual and Group Decision Making: A Prospect Theory Approach’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54 (3): 430455.
Wittenbaum G. M., Hubbell A. P., and Zuckerman C. (1999), ‘Mutual Enhancement: Toward an Understanding of the Collective Preference for Shared Information’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 (5): 967.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 50 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 385 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.