Skip to main content
×
Home

Imposed institutions and preferences for redistribution §

  • ALBERTO CHONG (a1) and MARK GRADSTEIN (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

To what extent do imposed institutions shape preferences? We consider this issue by comparing the market-versus-state attitudes of respondents from a capitalist country, Finland, and from an ex-communist group of Baltic countries, and by arguing that the period of communist rule can be viewed as an ‘experiment’ in institutional imposition. We find that, consistent with some earlier related work, citizens from ex-communist countries tend to be more supportive of state ownership than respondents from capitalist economies. However, they also favour increasing inequality and competition as the means to enhance incentives. We conclude that, in some important relevant dimensions, institutional imposition (which lasted for about 50 years) had a limited effect on preferences.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: achong6@gsu.edu
Footnotes
Hide All
§

We appreciate comments and suggestions from Gianmarco Leon, Vanessa Rios, two anonymous referees, and the editor. We are also grateful to seminar participants at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and University College London.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Acemoglu D. (2006), ‘Modeling Inefficient Institutions’, in Blundell R., Newey W. and Persson T. (eds), Advances in Economics and Econometrics, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, chapter 9, pp. 341–80.
Alesina A. and Fuchs-Schündeln N.. 2007. ‘Good-bye Lenin (or not?): The Effect of Communism on People's Preferences. American Economic Review, 97 (4): 1507–28.
Alesina A. and Glaeser E. (2004), Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alesina A. and Ferrara E. la (2005), ‘Preferences for Redistribution in the Land of Opportunities’, Journal of Public Economics, 89: 897931.
Beck T. and Laeven L. (2006) ‘Institution Building and Growth in Transition Economies’, Journal of Economic Growth, 11 (2): 157–86.
Berkowitz D., Pistor K. and Richard J.-F. (2003), ‘Economic Development, Legality, and the transplant effect’, European Economic Review, 47 (1): 165–95.
Biais B. and Perotti E. (2002), ‘Machiavellian Privatization’, American Economic Review, 92 (1): 240–58.
Corneo G. and Gruner H.-P. (2002), ‘Individual Preferences for Political Redistribution’, Journal of Public Economics, 83: 83107.
Di Tella R. and MacCulloch R. (2009), ‘Why Doesn't Capitalism Flow to Poor Countries?’ Mimeographed document. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 285–321. Available at http://www.people.hbs.edu/rditella/papers/BPEACapitalismFlow.pdf (accessed 10 March 2017).
Easterly W. and Levine R. (2003), ‘Tropics, Germs, and Crops: The Role of Endowments in Economic Development’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 50 (1): 339.
Ferguson N. (2003), Empire: The Rise and Fall of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power, New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gimpelson V. and Treisman D. (2015), ‘Misperceiving Inequality’, NBER Working Paper no. 21174, Cambridge, MA. Available at https://www.cato.org/publications/research-briefs-economic-policy/misperceiving-inequality (accessed 10 March 2017).
Guiso L., Sapienza P., and Zingales L. (2006), ‘Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes?’ Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20 (2): 2348.
Hare Paul (1989) The Economics of Shortage in the Centrally Planned Economies , in Davis C. and Charemza W., Models of Disequilibrium and Shortage in Centrally Planned Economies, Springer Netherlands: International Studies in Economic Modelling, pp. 4981.
Hare Paul (2012) Vodka and Pickled Cabbage: Eastern European Travels of a Professional Economist, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
La Porta R., López-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., and Vishny R.-W. (1998), ‘Law and Finance’, Journal of Political Economy, 106: 1113–55.
Meltzer A. and Richard S. (1981), ‘A Rational Theory of the Size of Government’, Journal of Political Economy, 89 (5): 914–27.
Nove A. (1992), An Economic History of the USSR, 3rd edn, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Pipes R. (1993), Russia under the Bolshevik Regime: 1919–1924, New York, NY: Knopf.
Pipes R. (1995), Russia under the Old Regime, 2nd edn, London: Penguin Books.
Rajan R. (2005), ‘Failed States, Vicious Cycles, and a Proposal’, Mimeographed document, Chicago: University of Chicago.
Rajan R. (2006), ‘The Persistence of Underdevelopment: Institutions, Human Capital, or Constituencies?’ NBER Working Paper 12093, Cambridge, MA.
Ravallion M. and Lokshin M. (2000), ‘Who Wants to Redistribute? The Tunnel Effect in 1990 Russia’, Journal of Public Economics, 76 (1): 87104.
Rodrik D. (2000), ‘Institutions for High-Quality Growth: What They Are and How to Acquire Them’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 35 (3): 331.
Shiller R., Boycko M., and Korobov V. (1991), ‘Popular Attitudes toward Free Markets: The Soviet Union and the United States Compared’, American Economic Review, 81 (3): 385400.
Shiller R., Boycko M., and Korobov V. (1992), ‘Hunting for Homo Sovieticus: Situational versus Attitudinal Factors in Economic Behavior’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1: 127–81.
Shleifer A. and Treisman D. (2005), ‘A Normal Country? Russia after Communism’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (1): 151–74.
Sokoloff K.-L. and Engerman S. (2000), ‘Institutions, Factor Endowments, and Paths of Development in the New World’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14 (3): 217–32.
Walkin J. (1962), The Rise of Democracy in Pre-Revolutionary Russia: Political and Social Institutions under the Last Three Tsars, New York, NY: Praeger.
Wuorinen J.-H. (1965), A History of Finland, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 7 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 120 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th April 2017 - 12th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.