Skip to main content

Institutions in the climate adaptation literature: a systematic literature review through the lens of the Institutional Analysis and Development framework


Analyses of climate adaptation seldom rely on the conceptual toolbox of institutional economics. Yet articles addressing institutions make up a large portion of the climate adaptation literature. With a wealth of institutionally relevant knowledge in the adaptation literature, organizing such knowledge in institutionally meaningful ways can advance the present understanding of the link between institutions and adaptation. Knowing which aspects of this link are well researched, and where in contrast research gaps lie, can provide guidance to institutional economists interested in adaptation. We contribute to this through a systematic review of the adaptation literature, assessing the consideration adaptation scholars give to different elements of the Institutional Analysis and Development framework. Results show a strong focus on collective choice and on adaptation by public actors, with an emphasis on rules in use, social interactions and, to a lesser extent, attributes of the community. Research gaps rather encompass operational and constitutional choice, private adaptation, physical interactions and biophysical conditions.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Abel, N., Gorddard, R., Harman, B., Leitch, A., Langridge, J., Ryan, A. and Heyenga, S. (2011), ‘Sea level rise, coastal development and planned retreat: analytical framework, governance principles and an Australian case study’, Environmental Science & Policy 14: 279–88.
Adger, W. N. (2003), ‘Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change’, Economic Geography 79 (4): 387404.
Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dale, A., Kocho-Schellenberg, E. and Patton, E. (2011), ‘Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic’, Global Environmental Change 21: 9951004.
Baird, J., Plummer, R., Haug, C. and Huitema, D. (2014), ‘Learning effects of interactive decision-making processes for climate change adaptation’, Global Environmental Change 27: 5163.
Berrang-Ford, L., Ford, J. D. and Paterson, J. (2011), ‘Are we adapting to climate change?’ Global Environmental Change 21 (1): 2533.
Berrang-Ford, L., Pearce, T. and Ford, J. D. (2015), ‘Systematic review approaches for climate change adaptation research’, Regional Environmental Change 15 (5): 755–69.
Bichard, E. and Kazmierczak, A. (2012), ‘Are homeowners willing to adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change?’ Climatic Change 112 (3–4): 633–54.
Bierbaum, R., Smith, J. B., Lee, A., Blair, M., Carter, L., III, F. S. C., Fleming, P., Ruffo, S., Stults, M., McNeeley, S., Wasley, E. and Verduzco, L. (2013), ‘A comprehensive review of climate adaptation in the United States: more than before, but less than needed’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 18: 361406.
Biesbroek, G. R., Klostermann, J. E. M., Termeer, C. J. A. M. and Kabat, P. (2013), ‘On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation’, Regional Environmental Change 13 (5): 1119–29.
Biesbroek, G. R., Swart, R. J., Carter, T. R., Cowan, C., Henrichs, T., Mela, H., Morecroft, M. D. and Rey, D. (2010), ‘Europe adapts to climate change: comparing national adaptation strategies’, Global Environmental Change 20 (3): 440–50.
Biesbroek, G. R., Termeer, C. J. A. M., Klostermann, J. E. M. and Kabat, P. (2014), ‘Rethinking barriers to adaptation: mechanism-based explanation of impasses in the governance of an innovative adaptation measure’, Global Environmental Change 26: 108–18.
Cox, M. (2012), ‘Diagnosing institutional fit: a formal perspective’, Ecology and Society 17 (4): 54.
Cuevas, S. C. (2016), ‘The interconnected nature of the challenges in mainstreaming climate change adaptation: evidence from local land use planning’, Climatic Change 3 (4): 661–76.
Cundill, G. (2010), ‘Monitoring social learning processes in adaptive comanagement: three case studies from South Africa’, Ecology and Society 15 (3): 28.
Denzau, A. T. and North, D. C. (1994), ‘Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions’, Kyklos 47 (1): 331.
Eakin, H. (2005), ‘Institutional change, climate risk, and rural vulnerability: cases from central Mexico’, World Development 33 (11): 1923–38.
Eisenack, K., Moser, S. C., Hoffmann, E., Klein, R. J. T., Oberlack, C., Pechan, A., Rotter, M. and Termeer, C. J. A. M. (2014), ‘Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation’, Nature Climate Change 4: 867–72.
Eisenack, K., Stecker, R., Reckien, D. and Hoffmann, E. (2012), ‘Adaptation to climate change in the transport sector: a review of actions and actors’, Mitigation Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 17 (5): 451–69.
Epstein, G., Pittman, J., Alexander, S. M., Berdej, S., Dyck, T., Kreitmair, U., Raithwell, K. J., Villamayor-Tomas, S., Vogt, J. M. and Armitage, D. (2015), ‘Institutional fit and the sustainability of social-ecological systems’, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 3440.
Ford, J. D., Berrang-Ford, L., Bunce, A., McKay, C., Irwin, M. and Pearce, T. (2015), ‘The status of climate change adaptation in Africa and Asia’, Regional Environmental Change 15 (5): 801–14.
Ford, J. D., Berrang-Ford, L. and Paterson, J. (2011), ‘A systematic review of observed climate change adaptation in developed nations’, Climatic Change 106 (2): 327–36.
Füssel, H.-M. and Klein, R. J. T. (2006), ‘Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking’, Climatic Change 75 (3): 301–29.
Glaas, E., Jonsson, A., Hjerpe, M. and Andersson-Sköld, Y. (2010), ‘Managing climate change vulnerabilities: formal institutions and knowledge use as determinants of adaptive capacity at the local level in Sweden’, Local Environment 15 (6): 525–39.
Grothmann, T. and Patt, A. (2005), ‘Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change’, Global Environmental Change 15: 199213.
Hagedorn, K. (2008), ‘Particular requirements for institutional analysis in nature-related sectors’, European Review of Agricultural Economics 35 (3): 357–84.
Hall, P. A. and Taylor, R. C. R. (1996), ‘Political science and the three new institutionalisms’, Political Studies 44 (5): 936–57.
Harries, T. and Penning-Rowsell, E. (2011), ‘Victim pressure, institutional inertia and climate change adaptation: the case of flood risk’, Global Environmental Change 21 (1): 188–97.
Hindriks, F. and Guala, F. (2015), ‘Understanding institutions: replies to Aoki, Binmore, Hodgson, Searle, Smith, and Sugden’, Journal of Institutional Economics 11 (3): 515–22.
Hinkel, J. and Bisaro, A. (2014), ‘A review and classification of analytical methods for climate change adaptation’, WIREs Climate Change 6 (2): 171–88.
Hinkel, J. and Bisaro, A. (2016), ‘Methodological choices in solution-oriented adaptation research: a diagnostic framework’, Regional Environmental Change 16: 720.
Hodgson, G. M. (2015), ‘On defining institutions: rules versus equilibria’, Journal of Institutional Economics 11 (3): 497505.
Huntjens, P., Lebel, L., Pahl-Wostl, C., Camkin, J., Schulze, R., Kranz, N. (2012), ‘Institutional design propositions for the governance of adaptation to climate change in the water sector’, Global Environmental Change 22: 6781.
IPCC (2013a), ‘Factsheet: What literature does the IPCC assess? Available online on ( Last accessed: 8 March 2017.
IPCC (2013b), ‘Principles governing IPCC work. Appendix A. Available online on ( Last accessed: 8 March 2017.
Janssen, M. A., Schoon, M. L., Ke, W. and Börner, K. (2006), ‘Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change’, Global Environmental Change 16: 240–52.
Jantarasami, L. C., Lawler, J. J. and Thomas, C. W. (2010), ‘Institutional barriers to climate change adaptation in US National Parks and Forests’, Ecology and Society 15 (4): 33.
Juhola, S. and Westerhoff, L. (2011), ‘Challenges of adaptation to climate change across multiple scales: a case study of network governance in two European countries’, Environmental Science & Policy 14 (3): 239–47.
Kellens, W., Terpstra, T. and Maeyer, P. D. (2013), ‘Perception and communication of flood risks: a systematic review of empirical research’, Risk Analysis 33 (1): 2449.
Knight, J. (1992), Institutions and Social Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Knight, J. and North, D. (1997), ‘Explaining economic change: the interplay between cognition and institutions’, Legal Theory 3 (3): 211–26.
McGinnis, M. D. (2011), ‘An introduction to IAD and the language of the Ostrom Workshop: a simple guide to a complex framework’, Policy Studies Journal 39 (1): 169–84.
Nguyen, T. P. L., Seddaiu, G., Virdis, S. G. P., Tidore, C., Pasqui, M., and Roggero, P. P. (2016), ‘Perceiving to learn or learning to perceive? Understanding farmers' perceptions and adaptation to climate uncertainties’, Agricultural Systems 143: 205–16.
Nielsen, J. Ø. and D'haen, S. A. L. (2014), ‘Asking about climate change: Reflections on methodology in qualitative climate change research published in Global Environmental Change since, 2000’, Global Environmental Change 24: 402–9.
North, D. C. (1991), ‘Institutions’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 97112.
O'brien, K., Eriksen, S., Nygaard, L. P. and Schjolden, A. (2011), ‘Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses’, Climate Policy 7 (1): 7388.
Oberlack, C. (2016), ‘Diagnosing institutional barriers and opportunities for adaptation to climate change’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 22 (5): 805–38.
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2005), Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2007), ‘Institutional rational choice an assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework’, in Sabatier, P. (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 2164.
Ostrom, E. (2009), ‘A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems’, Science 325 (5939): 419–22.
Ostrom, E. (2011), ‘Background on the institutional analysis and development framework’, Policy Studies Journal 39 (1): 728.
Paavola, J. (2007), ‘Institutions and environmental governance: a reconceptualization’, Ecological Economics 63 (1): 93103.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007), ‘Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change’, Water Resource Management 21 (1): 4962.
Pahl-Wostl, C., Mostert, E. and Tàbara, D. (2008), ‘The growing importance of social learning in water resources management and sustainability science’, Ecology and Society 13 (1): 24.
Pelling, M. and High, C. (2005), ‘Understanding adaptation: What can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity?’ Global Environmental Change 15 (4): 308–19.
Petticrew, M. and Roberts, H. (2008), ‘Systematic reviews – do they “work” in informing decision-making around health inequalities?Health Economics 3 (2): 197211.
Plummer, R., de Loë, R. and Armitage, D. (2012), ‘A systematic review of water vulnerability assessment tools’, Water Resource Management 26 (15): 4327–46.
Poteete, A. R. and Ostrom, E. (2008), ‘Fifteen years of empirical research on collective action in natural resource management: struggling to build large-N databases based on qualitative research’, World Development 36 (1): 176–95.
Poteete, A. R., Ostrom, E. and Janssen, M. (2010), Working Together, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Roggero, M. (2015), ‘Adapting institutions: exploring climate adaptation through institutional economics and set relations’, Ecological Economics 118: 114–22.
Seara, T., Clay, P. M. and Colburn, L. L. (2016), ‘Perceived adaptive capacity and natural disasters: a fisheries case study’, Global Environmental Change 38: 4957.
Searle, J. R. (2005), ‘What is an institution?’ Journal of Institutional Economics 1 (1): 122.
Smit, B. and Wandel, J. (2006), ‘Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability’, Global Environmental Change 16: 282–92.
Thackeray, S. J., Sparks, T. H., Frederiksen, M., Burthe, S., Bacon, P. J., Bell, J. R., Botham, M. S., Brereton, T. M., Bright, P. W., Carvalho, L., Clutton-Brock, T., Dawson, A., Edwards, M., Elliott, J. M., Harrington, R., Johns, D., Jones, I. D., Jones, J. T., Leech, D. I., Roy, D. B., Andy Scott, W., Smith, M., Smithers, R. J., Winfield, I. J. and Wanless, S. (2010), ‘Trophic level asynchrony in rates of phenological change for marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments’, Global Change Biology 16 (12): 330413.
Thiel, A., Schleyer, C., Hinkel, J., Schlüter, M., Hagedorn, K., Bisaro, A., Bobojonov, I. and Hamidov, A. (2016), ‘Transferring Williamson's discriminating alignment to the analysis of environmental governance of social-ecological interdependence’, Ecological Economics 128: 159–68.
Thiel, A., Schleyer, C. and Plieninger, T. (2012), ‘Wolves are mobile, while fruit trees are not! How characteristics of resources and supranational regulatory frameworks shape the provision of biodiversity and ecosystem services in Germany’, Environmental Policy and Governance. Published online in Wiley Online Library.
Vatn, A. (2005), Institutions and the Environment, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2017), ‘Disturbance features, coordination and cooperation: an institutional economics analysis of adaptations by water user associations in Spain’, Journal of Institutional Economics (submitted).
Vogt, J. M., Epstein;, G. B. Mincey, S. K., Fischer, B. C. and McCord, P. (2015), ‘Putting the “E” in SES: unpacking the ecology in the Ostrom social-ecological system framework’, Ecology and Society, 20 (1): 55.
Williamson, O. E. (2000), ‘The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead’, Journal of Economic Literature 38: 595613.
Young, O. (2002), The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Zhang, Y. W., Hagerman, A. D. and McCarl, B. A. (2013), ‘How climate factors influence the spatial distribution of Texas cattle breeds’, Climatic Change 118 (2): 183–95.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Roggero supplementary material
Roggero supplementary material 1

 PDF (183 KB)
183 KB


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 69 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 285 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 7th August 2017 - 18th March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.