Skip to main content
×
Home

The interaction of entrepreneurship and institutions

  • MAGNUS HENREKSON (a1) and TINO SANANDAJI (a2) (a1)
Abstract:
Abstract:

Previous research, notably Baumol (1990), has highlighted the role of institutions in channeling entrepreneurial supply into productive, unproductive, or destructive activities. However, entrepreneurship is not only influenced by institutions – entrepreneurs often help shape institutions themselves. The bilateral causal relation between entrepreneurs and institutions is examined in this paper. Entrepreneurs affect institutions in at least three ways. Entrepreneurship abiding by existing institutions is occasionally disruptive enough to challenge the foundations of prevailing institutions. Entrepreneurs sometimes have the opportunity to evade institutions, which tends to undermine the effectiveness of the institutions, or cause institutions to change for the better. Lastly, entrepreneurs can directly alter institutions through innovative political entrepreneurship. Like business entrepreneurship, innovative political activity may be productive or unproductive, depending on the incentives facing entrepreneurs.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: magnus.henrekson@ifn.se
**Email: tino@uchicago.edu
References
Hide All
Acemoglu D. (1995), ‘Reward Structures and the Allocation of Talent’, European Economic Review, 39 (1): 1733.
Acemoglu D., Johnson S., and Robinson J. A. (2005), ‘Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth’, in Aghion P. and Durlauf S. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 385472.
Acs Z. J. and Phillips R. J. (2002), ‘Entrepreneurship and Philanthropy in American Capitalism’, Small Business Economics, 19 (3): 189204.
Aidis R., Estrin S., and Mickiewicz T. (2008), ‘Institutions and Entrepreneurship Development in Russia: A Comparative Perspective’, Journal of Business Venturing, 23 (6): 656672.
Arrow K. J. (1962), ‘The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing’, Review of Economic Studies, 29 (3): 155173.
Åslund A., Bonne P., and Johnson S. (2002), ‘Escaping the Under-Reform Trap’, IMF Staff Papers, 48 (1): 88108.
Asoni A. and Sanandaji T. (2009), ‘Taxation and the Quality and Quantity of Entrepreneurship’, IFN Working Paper No. 813, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Stockholm.
Battilana J. (2006), ‘Agency and Institutions: The Enabling Role of Individuals’ Social Position’, Organization, 13 (5): 653676.
Baumol W. J. (1990), ‘Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive’, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5): 893921.
Baumol W. J. (2010), The Microtheory of Innovative Entrepreneurship, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Becker G. S. and Murphy K. M. (2000), Social Economics: Market Behavior in a Social Environment, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bergh A. and Erlingsson G. Ó. (2009), ‘Liberalization without Retrenchment: Understanding the Consensus on Swedish Welfare State Reforms’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 32 (1): 7193.
Boettke P. J. and Coyne C. J. (2003), ‘Entrepreneurship and Development: Cause or Consequence?’, Advances in Austrian Economics, 6: 6787.
Boettke P. J. and Coyne C. J. (2009), ‘Context Matters: Institutions and Entrepreneurship’, Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 5 (3): 135209.
Boettke P. J. and Leeson P. T. (2009), ‘Two-Tiered Entrepreneurship and Economic Development’, International Review of Law and Economics, 29 (3): 252259.
Boschini A., Pettersson J., and Roine J. (2007), ‘Resource Curse or Not: A Question of Appropriability’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 109 (3): 593617.
Buchanan J. M. (1980), ‘Rent Seeking and Profit Seeking’, in Buchanan J. M. and Tollison G. (eds.), Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society, College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, pp. 315.
Calomiris C. (2009a), ‘Financial Innovation, Regulation, and Reform’, Cato Journal, 29 (1): 6591.
Calomiris C. (2009b), ‘The Subprime Turmoil: What's Old, What's New, and What's Next’, Journal of Structured Finance, 15 (1): 652.
Caplan B. (2007), The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chong A. and Calderón C. (2000), ‘Causality and Feedback between Institutional Measures and Economic Growth’, Economics and Politics, 12 (1): 6982.
Coyne C. J. and Leeson P. T. (2004), ‘The Plight of Underdeveloped Countries’, Cato Journal, 24 (3): 235249.
Dahl R. (1961), Who Governs? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Daokui Li D., Feng J., and Jiang H. (2006), ‘Institutional Entrepreneurs’, American Economic Review, 96 (2): 358362.
Davis S. J. and Henrekson M. (1997), ‘Industrial Policy, Employer Size and Economic Performance in Sweden’, in Freeman R. B., Topel R., and Swedenborg B. (eds.), The Welfare State in Transition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 353397.
DiLorenzo Thomas (1988), ‘Competition and Political Entrepreneurship’, Review of Austrian Economics, 2 (1): 5971.
DiMaggio P. J. (1988), ‘Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory’, in Zucker L. (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 322.
Djankov S., Qian Y., Roland G., and Zhuravskaya E. (2006), ‘Entrepreneurship in China and Russia Compared’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 4 (2/3): 352365.
Douhan R. and Henrekson M. (2010), ‘Entrepreneurship and Second-Best Institutions: Going Beyond Baumol's Typology’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20 (4): 629643.
Fenn G. W., Liang N., and Prowse S. (1995), The Economics of the Private Equity Market, Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Freeman R. B., Topel R., and Swedenborg B. (eds.) (1997), The Welfare State in Transition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gaglio C. M. and Katz J. A. (2001), ‘The Psychological Basis of Opportunity Identification: Entrepreneurial Alertness’, Small Business Economics, 16 (2): 95111.
Gilley B. (2002), ‘Entrepreneurs and Politics in Rural China’, in Bonnell V. E. and Gold T. B. (eds.), The New Entrepreneurs of Europe and Asia, New York and London: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 6682.
Glaeser E. L. (2005), ‘Paternalism and Psychology’, NBER Working Paper No. 11789.
Gompers P. A. and Lerner J. (2004), The Venture Capital Cycle, 2nd edn, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Guriev S. and Rachinsky A. (2005), ‘The Role of Oligarchs in Russian Capitalism’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (1): 131150.
Gurkan C. (2005), ‘A Comparison of Veblen and Schumpeter on Technology’, STPS Working Paper No. 509.
Hall R. E. and Jones C. I. (1999), ‘Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker Than Others?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (1): 83116.
Heilmann S. (2008), ‘From Local Experiments to National Policy: The Origins of China's Distinctive Policy Process’, China Journal, 59: 130.
Henrekson M. (2005), ‘Entrepreneurship – a Weak Link in the Welfare State?’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 14 (3): 437467.
Henrekson M. and Jakobsson U. (2001), ‘Where Schumpeter was Nearly Right – the Swedish Model and Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 11 (3): 331358.
Henrekson M. and Sanandaji T. (2010), ‘Entrepreneurship and the Theory of Taxation’, Small Business Economics, forthcoming.
Högfeldt P. (2005), ‘The History and Politics of Corporate Ownership in Sweden’, in Morck R. K. (ed.), A History of Corporate Governance around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 517590.
Holcombe R. G. (2007), Entrepreneurship and Economic Progress, New York: Routledge.
Hwang H. and Powell W. W. (2005), ‘Institutions and Entrepreneurship’, in Alvarez S. A., Agarwal R., and Sorenson O. (eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, Boston and Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 179210.
Kalantaridis C. and Labrianidis L. (2004), ‘Rural Entrepreneurs in Russia and the Ukraine: Origins, Motivations, and Institutional Change’, Journal of Economic Issues, 38 (3): 659682.
Kasper W. and Streit M. E. (1998), Institutional Economics, Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Kirzner I. M. (1973), Competition and Entrepreneurship, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Kirzner I. M. (1992), The Meaning of the Market Process: Essays in the Development of Modern Austrian Economics, New York: Routledge.
Kirzner I. M. (2009), ‘The Alert and Creative Entrepreneur: A Clarification’, Small Business Economics, 32 (2): 145152.
Knight F. H. (1921), Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, New York: Houghton Mifflin.
La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., and Vishny R. W. (1999), ‘The Quality of Government’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15 (1): 222279.
Lewis O. and Teets J. (2009), ‘A China Model? Understanding the Evolution of a “Socialist Market Economy”’, Looking Glass Report, Glasshouse Forum, Stockholm.
Lindbeck A. (1982), ‘Tax Effects versus Budget Effects on Labor Supply’, Economic Inquiry, 20 (3): 473489.
Lindert P. H. (2004), Growing Public: Volume 1, The Story: Social Spending and Economic Growth Since the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lu C. (1994), Entrepreneurship in Suppressed Markets: Private-Sector Experience in China, New York: Garland.
Lucas R. E. (1988), ‘On the Mechanics of Economic Development’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22 (1): 342.
Maddison A. (1982), Phases of Capitalist Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McClelland D. C. (1961), The Achieving Society, Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
Meredith M. (2002), Mugabe: Power and Plunder in Zimbabwe, London: Perseus Press.
Murphy K. M., Shleifer A., and Vishny R. W. (1991), ‘The Allocation of Talent: Implication for Growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (2): 503530.
North D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
North D. C. and Weingast B. R. (1989), ‘Constitutions and Commitment: Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth Century England’, Journal of Economic History, 49 (4): 803832.
Olson M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Parker S. C. (2009), The Economics of Entrepreneurship, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peebles G. and Wilson P. (2002), Economic Growth and Development in Singapore: Past and Future, Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Persson T. and Tabellini G. (2004), ‘Constitutions and Economic Policy’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18 (1): 7598.
Persson T. and Tabellini G. (2006), ‘Electoral Systems and Economic Policy’, in Weingast B. R. and Wittman D. A. (eds.), Handbook of Political Economy, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 723738.
Polsby N. (1984), Political Innovation in America, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Pontusson J. (2005), Inequality and Prosperity: Social Europe versus Liberal America, Ithaka, NY: Cornell University Press.
Rauch A. and Frese M. (2000), ‘Psychological Approaches to Entrepreneurial Success: A General Model and an Overview of Findings’, in Cooper C. L. and Robertson I. T. (eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York: Wiley, pp. 101142.
Rodrik D. (2008), ‘Second-Best Institutions’, American Economic Review, 98 (2): 100104.
Rodrik D., Subramanian A., and Trebbi F. (2004), ‘Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development’, Journal of Economic Growth, 9 (2): 131165.
Rogerson R. (2007), ‘Taxation and Market Work: Is Scandinavia an Outlier?’, Economic Theory, 32 (1): 5985.
Romer P. M. (1986), ‘Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth’, Journal of Political Economy, 94 (5): 10021037.
Schneider M., Teske P., and Minton M. (1995), Public Entrepreneurs: Agents for Change in American Government, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schumpeter J. A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Scott R. W. (1995), Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Scott R. W. (2004), ‘Institutional Theory: Contributing to a Theoretical Research Programme’, in Smith K. G. and Hitt M. A. (eds.), Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 460485.
Slinko I., Yakovlev E., and Zhuravskaya E. (2005), ‘Law for Sale: Evidence from Russia’, American Law and Economics Review, 7 (1): 284318.
Sobel R. S. (2008), ‘Testing Baumol: Institutional Quality and the Productivity of Entrepreneurship’, Journal of Business Venturing, 23 (6): 641655.
Steinmo S. H. (2010), The Evolution of Modern States: Sweden, Japan and the United States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strömberg D. (2004), ‘Radio's Impact on Public Spending’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119 (1): 189221.
Swedberg R. (2000), Entrepreneurship: The Social Science View, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tsai K. (2006) ‘Informal Adaptive Institutions and Endogenous Institutional Change in China’, World Politics, 59 (1): 116141.
Van der Steen M. and Groenewegen J. (2009), ‘Policy Entrepreneurship: Empirical Inquiry into Policy Agents and Institutional Structures’, Journal of Innovation Economics, 2 (4): 4161.
Walker D. (1977), ‘Thorstein Veblen's Economic System’, Economic Inquiry, 15 (2): 217222.
Wagner R. E. (1966), ‘Pressure Groups and Political Entrepreneurs: A Review Essay’, Public Choice, 1 (1): 161170.
Ward T. B. (2004), ‘Cognition, Creativity and Entrepreneurship’, Journal of Business Venturing, 19 (2): 173188.
Weber M. (2001 [1905]), The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, London and New York: Routledge.
Yu T. F. L. (2001), ‘An Entrepreneurial Perspective of Institutional Change’, Constitutional Political Economy, 12 (3): 217236.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 176 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 520 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.