Skip to main content
×
Home

Varieties of legal systems: towards a new global taxonomy

  • MATHIAS M. SIEMS (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Legal scholars, economists and other social scientist often refer to the idea that countries can be classified into a number of ‘legal families’ or ‘legal origins’. Yet, this research is unsatisfactory as regards the actual classifications of the legal systems of the world. It is the aim of this paper to fill this gap and to develop a more robust taxonomy of legal systems. This taxonomy is based on a new dataset of 156 countries that is subsequently analysed with tools of network analysis. Applying cluster optimisation, this paper finds that the world's legal systems can be divided into four clusters. It displays those clusters in a map, akin to the Inglehart–Welzel cultural map. It is suggested that those findings have important implications, not only for our understanding of the legal world, but also for the feasibility of legal transplants and harmonisation.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Varieties of legal systems: towards a new global taxonomy
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Varieties of legal systems: towards a new global taxonomy
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Varieties of legal systems: towards a new global taxonomy
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: siems@fulbrightmail.org
References
Hide All
Armour J., Deakin S., Sarkar P., Siems M., and Singh A. (2009), ‘Shareholder Protection and Stock Market Development: A Test of the Legal Origins Hypothesis’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 6: 343380.
Bavinck M. and Woodman G. R. (2009), ‘Can There be Maps of Law?’, in von Benda-Beckmann F., K. von Benda-Beckmann , and Griffiths A. (eds.), Spatializing Law: An Anthropological Geography of Law in Society, Abingdon: Ashgate, pp. 195218.
Berkowitz D., Pistor K., and Richard J.-F. (2003a), ‘Economic Development, Legality, and the Transplant Effect’, European Economic Review, 47: 165195.
Berkowitz D., Pistor K., and Richard J.-F. (2003b), ‘The Transplant Effect’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 51: 163204.
Bogdan M. (1994), Comparative Law, Stockholm: Kluwer.
Borgatti S. P. and Halgin D. S. (2011), ‘Analyzing Affiliation Networks’, in Scott J. and Carrington P. J. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, London: Sage, pp. 417433.
Coe N. M., Kelly P. F., and Yeung H. W. C. (2010), Economic Geography, Malden, AM: Blackwell.
Constantinesco L.-J. (1983), Rechtsvergleichung, Band III: Die Rechtsvergleichende Wissenschaft, Cologne: Carl Heymanns.
David R. (1985), Major Legal Systems in the World Today: An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law, 3rd edn., London: Stevens.
Deakin S. (2015), ‘The Evolution of Theory and Method of Law and Finance’, in Ferran E., Moloney N., and Payne J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Financial Regulation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1340.
Derrett J. D. M. (ed.) (1968), An Introduction to Legal Systems, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Djankov S., La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., and Shleifer A. (2008), ‘The Law and Economics of Self-Dealing’, Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 430465.
Ferreres Comella V. (2011), ‘The Rise of Specialised Constitutional Courts’, in Ginsburg T. and Dixon R. (eds.), Research Handbook in Comparative Constitutional Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 265277.
Ferligoj A., Doreian P. and Batagelj V. (2011), ‘Positions and Roles’, in Scott J. and Carrington P. J. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, London: Sage, pp. 434446.
Fukuyama F. (2011), The Origins of Political Order, London: Profile Books.
Garoupa N. and Ginsburg T. (2011). ‘Hybrid Judicial Career Structures: Reputation v Legal Tradition’, Journal of Legal Analysis, 3: 411448.
Garoupa N. and Pargendler M. (2014), ‘A Law and Economics Perspective on Legal Families’, European Journal of Legal Studies, 7: 3660.
Gelter M. and Siems M. (2013), ‘Language, Legal Origins, and Culture before the Courts: Cross-Citations between Supreme Courts in Europe’, Supreme Court Economic Review, 21: 215269.
Glenn H. P. (2014), Legal Traditions of the World, 5th edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Graff M. (2008), ‘Law and Finance: Common Law and Civil Law Countries Compared – An Empirical Critique’, Economica, 75: 6083.
Hall P. A. and Soskice D. (2001), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hanneman R. and Riddle M. (2005), ‘Introduction to Social Network Methods’, available at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/ (accessed 4 January 2016).
Hertel C. (2009), ‘Legal Systems of the World – An Overview’, Notarius International, 128141.
Husa J. (2004), ‘Classification of Legal Families Today. Is it Time for a Memorial Hymn?’, Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé, 1138.
Husa J. (2012), ‘Legal Families’, , in Smits J. M. (ed.), Elgar Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law, 2nd edn., Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 491504.
Inglehart R. and Welzel C. (2010), ‘Changing Mass Priorities: The Link Between Modernization and Democracy’, Perspectives on Politics, 8: 554567.
Kagan R. A. (2001), Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kaufmann D., Kraay A., and Mastruzzi M. (2010), ‘The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1682130 (accessed 4 January 2016).
Kick E. L., McKinney L. A., McDonald S., and Jorgenson A. (2011), ‘A Multiple-Network Analysis of the World System of Nations, 1995–1999’, in Scott J. and Carrington P. J. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, London: Sage, pp. 311327.
Kim K. (2010), ‘Mixed Systems in Legal Origins Analysis’, Southern California Law Review, 83: 693728.
Klerman D. M., Mahoney P. G., Spamann H., and Weinstein M. I. (2011), ‘Legal Origins or Colonial History?’, Journal of Legal Analysis, 3: 379409.
Knoke D. and Yang S. (2008), Social Network Analysis, 2nd edn, Los Angeles: Sage.
Kolaczyk E. D. (2009), Statistical Analysis of Network Data, New York: Springer.
Kurtz M. J. and Schrank A. (2007), ‘Growth and Governance: Models, Measures, and Mechanisms’, Journal of Politics, 69: 538554.
La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., and Shleifer A. (2008), ‘The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins’, Journal of Economic Literature, 46: 285332.
La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., and Vishny R. (1998), ‘Law and Finance’, Journal of Political Economy, 106: 1113–55.
Lalenis K., De Jong M., and Mamadouh V. (2002), ‘Families of Nations and Institutional Transplantation’, in De Jong M., Lalenis K., and Mamadouh V. (eds.), The Theory and Practice of Institutional Transplantation, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 3352.
Legrand P. (1996), ‘European Legal Systems Are Not Converging’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 45: 5281.
Lewis M. P., Simons G. F., and Fennig C. D. (eds.) (2013), Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 17th edn., Dallas, Texas: SIL International.
Liebman B. L. (2014), ‘Legal Reform: China's Law-Stability Paradox’, Daedalus, 143: 96109.
Lloyd P., Mahutga M. C., and de Leeuw J. (2009), ‘Looking Back and Forging Ahead: Thirty Years of Social Network Research on the World-System’, Journal of World-System Research, 15: 4885.
Luts L. A. (2011) ‘Typologies of Modern Legal Systems of the World’, in Butler W. E., Kresin O. V., and Shemshuchenko I.S. (eds.), Foundations of Comparative Law: Methods and Typologies, London: Wildy, Simmonds and Hill Publishing, pp. 3652.
Mattei U. (1997), ‘Three Patterns of Law: Taxonomy and Change in the World's Legal Systems’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 45: 544.
Menski W. (2006), Comparative Law in a Global Context, 2nd edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mische A. (2011), ‘Relational Sociology, Culture, and Agency’, in Scott J. and Carrington P. J. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, London: Sage, pp. 8097.
Nielsen L. (2011), ‘Classifications of Countries Based on Their Level of Development: How it is Done and How it Could be Done’, IMF Working Paper WP/11/31, available at www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/wp1131.pdf (accessed 4 January 2016).
Pargendler M. (2012), ‘The Rise and Decline of Legal Families’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 60: 10431074.
Peters A. and Schwenke H. (2000), ‘Comparative Law Beyond Post-modernism’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 49: 800834.
Popper S. K. (1963), Conjectures and Refutations, London: Routledge.
Reimann M. (2001), ‘Beyond National Systems: A Comparative Law for the International Age’, Tulane Law Review, 75: 11031120.
Reynolds T. and Flores A. (1989), Foreign Law: Current Sources of Basic Legislation in Jurisdictions of the World, Littleton, CO: Rothman.
Siems M. (2007), ‘Legal Origins: Reconciling Law & Finance and Comparative Law’, McGill Law Journal, 52: 5581.
Siems M. (2008). ‘Shareholder Protection Around the World (‘Leximetric II’)’, Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 33: 111147.
Siems M. (2010). ‘The Web of Creditor and Shareholder Protection: A Comparative Legal Network Analysis’, Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 27: 747784.
Siems M. (2014). Comparative Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Siems M. and Deakin S. (2010), ‘Comparative Law and Finance: Past, Present and Future Research’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 166: 120140.
Snyder D. and Kick E. L. (1979), ‘Structural Position in the World System and Economic Growth, 1955–1970: A Multiple-Network Analysis of Transnational Interactions’, American Journal of Sociology, 84: 10961126.
Sommerer T., Holzinger K., and Knill C. (2008), ‘The Pair Approach: What Causes Convergence of Environmental Policies?’, in Holzinger K., Knill C., and Arts B. (eds.), Environmental Policy Convergence in Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 144195.
Twining W. (1999). ‘Mapping Law’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 50: 1249.
Twining W. (2000), Globalisation and Legal Theory, London: Butterworths.
Vanderlinden J. (1995), Comparer les droit, Diegem: E. Story-Scientia.
Varga C. (2010), ‘Taxonomy of Law and Legal Mapping, Patterns and Limits of the Classification of Legal Systems’, Acta Juridica Hungarica, 51: 253272.
Voigt S. 2013. ‘How (Not) to Measure Institutions’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 9: 126.
Zweigert K. and Kötz H. (1998), An Introduction to Comparative Law, 3rd edn., Oxford: Clarendon.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 32
Total number of PDF views: 223 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 536 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 15th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.