Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Who are the owners of the firm: shareholders, employees or no one?


The issue of firm ownership is an ongoing debate. For several decades, contractarian theory has undoubtedly shaped the academic debate in both law and economics. Proponents of this approach suggest that shareholders can legitimately be considered the owners of a firm because they hold shares. This approach, though attractive, is legally incorrect. Legal scholars have noted that a corporation cannot legally belong to shareholders or other stakeholders; no one owns the firm (and a corporation). The question of firm ownership masks the following crucial issue: Who should govern the firm? In this article, after returning to the theoretical debate on firm ownership and explaining why a firm cannot be owned, we shall analyze power as the core of firm governance. This approach is a potentially relevant and accurate way to address the problems of specific human investment, collective creation and productive (consummate) cooperation in modern firms.

Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

M. Aoki (1988), Information, Incentives and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

S. Bainbridge (2008), The New Corporate Governance in Theory and Practice, New York: Oxford University Press.

A. A. Berle Jr (1932), ‘For Whom Corporate Managers are Trustees: A Note’, Harvard Law Review, 45 (8): 13651372.

A. A. Berle Jr (1947), ‘The Theory of Enterprise Entity’, Columbia Law Review, 47 (3): 343358.

M. M. Blair and L. A. Stout (1999), ‘A Team Production Theory of the Corporate Law’, Virginia Law Review, 85 (2): 247328.

P. Bolton and D. S. Scharfstein (1998), ‘Corporate Finance, the Theory of the Firm and Organizations’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12 (4): 95114.

V. Chassagnon (2011a), ‘The Network-Firm as a Single Real Entity: Beyond the Aggregate of Distinct Legal Entities’, Journal of Economic Issues, 45 (1): 113136.

V. Chassagnon (2012a), ‘Nature et ontologie sociale de la firme’, Social Science Information, 51 (1): 7196.

R. Coase (1960), ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, Journal of Law and Economics, 3: 140.

R. W. Coff (1999), ‘When Competitive Advantage Doesn't Lead to Performance: The Resource-Based View and Stakeholder Bargaining Power’, Organization Science, 10 (2): 119133.

R. A. Dahl (1957), ‘The Concept of Power’, Behavioral Science, 2 (3): 201215.

E. M. Dodd (1932), ‘For Whom Are Corporate Managers Trustees?’, Harvard Law Review, 45 (7): 11451163.

E. M. Dodd (1941), ‘The Modern Firm, Private Property, and Recent Federal Legislation’, Harvard Law Review, 54 (6): 917948.

T. Donaldson and L. E. Preston (1995), ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’, Academy of Management Review, 20 (1): 6591.

G. K. Dow and L. Putterman (2000), ‘Why Capital Suppliers (Usually) Hire Workers: What We Know and What We Need to Know’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43 (3): 319336.

J. H. Dyer and H. Singh (1998), ‘The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage’, Academy of Management Review, 23 (4): 660679.

F. H. Easterbrook and D. R. Fischel (1985), ‘Limited Liability and the Firm’, University of Chicago Law Review, 52 (1): 89117.

D. Ellerman (2007), ‘On the Role of Capital in ‘Capitalist’ and in Labor-Managed Firms’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 39 (1): 526.

E. F. Fama (1980), ‘Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm’, Journal of Political Economics, 88 (2): 288307.

E. Fama and M. Jensen (1983), ‘Separation of Ownership and Control’, Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (2): 301326.

B. Frey and M. Osterloh (2005), ‘Yes Managers Should Be Paid Like Bureaucrats’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 14 (1): 96111.

P. A. Hall and D. Soskice (2001), ‘Introduction’, in P. A. Hall and D. Soskice (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 168.

O. D. Hart (1995), Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

O. D. Hart and J. Moore (1990), ‘Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm’, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (6): 11191158.

O. D. Hart and J. Moore (2007), ‘Incomplete Contracts and Ownership: Some New Thoughts’, American Economic Review, 97 (2): 182186.

O. D. Hart and J. Moore (2008), ‘Contracts as Reference Points’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123 (1): 148.

A. Hillman and G. Keim (2001), ‛Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What's the Bottom Line?’, Strategic Management Journal, 22 (2): 125139.

G. M. Hodgson (2009), ‘The Great Crash of 2008 and the Reform of Economics’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33 (6): 12051221.

P. Ireland (1999), ‘Firm Law and the Myth of Shareholder Ownership’, Modern Law Review, 62 (1): 3257.

P. Ireland (2010), ‘Limited liability, Shareholder Rights and the Problem of Corporate Irresponsibility’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34 (5): 837856.

P. Ireland , I. Grigg-Spall , and D. Kelly (1987), ‘The Conceptual Foundations of Modern Firm Law’, Journal of Law and Society, 14 (1): 149165.

K. Iwai (1999), ‘Persons, Things and Firms: The Corporate Personality Controversy and Comparative Corporate Governance’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 47 (4): 583632.

M. C. Jensen and W. H. Meckling (1976), ‛Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4): 305360.

J. Kay and A. Silberston (1995), ‘Corporate Governance’, National Institute Economic Review, 153 (1): 84107.

G. R. Krippner (2005), ‘The Financialization of the American Economy’, Socio-Economic Review, 3 (2): 173208.

L. Lan and L. Heracleous (2010), ‘Rethinking Agency Theory: The View From Law’, Academy of Management Review, 35 (2): 294314.

E. R. Latty (1936), ‘The Corporate Entity as a Solvent of Legal Problems’, Michigan Law Review, 34 (5): 597636.

W. Lazonick and M. O'Sullivan (2000), ‛Maximizing Shareholder Value: A New Ideology for Corporate Governance’, Economy and Society, 29 (1): 1335.

R. Marris (1964), ‘The Economic Theory of ‘Managerial' Capitalism’, New York: MacMillan.

J. Moore (1992), ‘The Firm as a Collection of Assets’, European Economic Review, 36 (2–3): 493507.

L. G. Putterman (1993), ‘Ownership and the Nature of the Firm’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 17 (2): 243263.

M. Radin (1932), ‘The Endless Problem of Corporate Personality’, Columbia Law Review, 32 (4): 643667.

R. G. Rajan and J. Wulf (2006), ‘The Flattening Firm: Evidence from Panel Data on the Changing Nature of Corporate Hierarchies’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 88 (4): 759773.

R. G. Rajan and L. Zingales (1998), ‘Power in a Theory of the Firm’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113 (2): 387432.

R. G. Rajan and L. Zingales (2000), ‘The Governance of the New Enterprise’, in X. Vives (ed.), Corporate Governance: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 201227.

R. G. Rajan and L. Zingales (2001), ‘The Firm as a Dedicated Hierarchy: A Theory of the Origins and Growth of Firms’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116 (3): 805851.

H. A. Simon (1951), ‘A Formal Theory of the Employment Relationship’, Econometrica, 19 (3): 293305.

H. Wang and J. Barney (2006), ‘Employee Incentives to Make Firm Specific Investment: Implications for Resource-Based Theories of Corporate Diversification’, Academy of Management Review, 31 (2): 466476.

O. E. Williamson (1996), ‘Efficiency, Power, Authority and Economic Organization’, in J. Groenewegen (ed.), Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 1142.

A. Zattoni (2011), ‘Who Should Control a Firm? Toward a Contingency Stakeholder Model for Allocating Ownership Rights’, Journal of Business Ethics, 103 (2): 255274.

L. Zingales (2000), ‘In Search of New Foundations’, Journal of Finance, 55 (4): 16231653.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 53 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 455 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.