Skip to main content Accessibility help

Dialect change and its consequences for the Dutch dialect landscape. How much is due to the standard variety and how much is not?

  • Wilbert Heeringa (a1) and Frans Hinskens (a2)


We recorded older male speakers and younger female speakers of 86 local dialects of Dutch. Using these data, we analyze and visualize the influence of standard Dutch on apparent time changes in these dialects. Focusing for the most part on variation in the sound components, we test whether (I) dialect change is mainly the result of convergence to standard Dutch, (II) sound changes in two dialects which make them converge to standard Dutch also make them more similar, and (III) sound changes in two dialects which make them diverge from standard Dutch also make them less similar. We used three-dimensional (first hypothesis) and five-dimensional Levenshtein distance implementations (second and third hypothesis). These implementations are a novel step in dialectometry and in the study of ongoing processes of language change and their consequences for the dialect landscape. The findings corroborate all three hypotheses.


Corresponding author

*Address for correspondence: Wilbert Heeringa, Institute of German studies, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, P.O. Box 2503, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany Tel.: +49 441 798 4547,


Hide All
Auer, Peter, Hinskens, Frans & Kerswill, Paul (eds.). 2005. Dialect change. The convergence and divergence of dialects in contemporary societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bellmann, Günther. 1996. Between base dialect and standard language. In P. Auer (ed.), Dialect levelling and the standard varieties in Europe, special issue of Folia Linguistica 32(1/2). 23-34.
Blancquaert, Edgar & Pée, Willem. (eds.). 1925-1982. Reeks Nederlands(ch)e dialectatlassen. Antwerp: De Sikkel.
Boves, Tom & Gerritsen, Marinel. 1995. Inleiding in de sociolinguïstiek. Utrecht/Antwerp: Spectrum.
Chambers, Jack & Trudgill, Peter. 1998. Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giesbers, Charlotte. 2008. Dialecten op de grens van twee talen; een dialectologisch en sociolinguïstisch onderzoek in het Kleverlands dialectgebied. Nijmegen: Radboud University of Nijmegen.
Gooskens, Charlotte & Heeringa, Wilbert. 2004. Perceptive evaluation of Levenshtein dialect distance measurements using Norwegian dialect data. Language Variation and Change 16(3). 189-207.
Heeringa, Wilbert. 2004. Measuring Dialect Pronunciation Differences using Levenshtein Distance. Groningen: University of Groningen dissertation.
Heeringa, Wilbert & Nerbonne, John. 2000. Change, convergence and divergence among Dutch and Frisian. In Piter Boersma, Pieter Breuker, Lammert Jansma & Jacob van der Vaart (eds.), Philologia Frisica Anno 1999. Lêzingen fan it fyftjinde Frysk filologekongres, 88-109. Ljouwert: Fryske Akademy.
Heeringa, Wilbert, Nerbonne, John, Niebaum, Hermann, Nieuweboer, Rogier & Kleiweg, Peter. 2000. Dutch-German contact in and around Bentheim. In Dicky Gilbers, John Nerbonne & Jos Schaeken (eds.), Languages in Contact (Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 28), 145-156. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Heeringa, Wilbert & Hinskens, Frans. 2014. Convergence between dialect varieties and dialect groups in the Dutch language area. In Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), Aggregating dialectology, typology, and register analysis. Linguistic variation in text and speech (Linguae et Litterae 28) 26-52. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Hinskens, Frans, Auer, Peter & Kerswill, Paul. 2005. The study of dialect convergence and divergence: conceptual and methodological considerations. In P. Auer, F. Hinskens & P. Kerswill (eds.), Dialect change. The convergence and divergence of dialects in contemporary societies, 1-48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoppenbrouwers, Cor. 1983. Het genus in een Brabants regiolect. TABU, Bulletin voor Nederlandse Taalkunde 13(1). 1-25.
Kerswill, Paul. 2002. Koineization and accommodation. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 669-702. Oxford: Blackwell.
Oostendorp, Marc van. 2007. Exceptions to Final Devoicing. In J. van de Weijer & E. van der Torre (ed.), Voicing in Dutch. (De)voicing - phonology, phonetics and psycholinguistics, 81-98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Siegel, Jeff. 1985. Koines and koineization. Language in Society 14. 357-378.
Siegel, Jeff. 2001. Koine formation and creole genesis. In N. Smith & T. Veenstra (eds), Creolization and contact, 175-197. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Scholtmeijer, Harrie. 1996. De nieuwe Winkler; 83 dialectvertalingen van de gelijkenis van de verloren zoon (Meertens Institute Electronic Publications in Linguistics.) Available at:
Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
Weinreich, Uriel. 1954. Is a structural dialectology possible? Word 10. 388-400.
Winkler, Johan. 1874. Algemeen Nederduitsch en Friesch dialecticon. ‘s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Dialect change and its consequences for the Dutch dialect landscape. How much is due to the standard variety and how much is not?

  • Wilbert Heeringa (a1) and Frans Hinskens (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.