Skip to main content
×
×
Home

A multivariate spatial analysis of vowel formants in American English

  • Jack Grieve (a1), Dirk Speelman (a2) and Dirk Geeraerts (a2)
Abstract

This paper presents the results of a multivariate spatial analysis of thirty-eight vowel formant variables measured in 236 cities from across the contiguous United States, based on the acoustic data from the Atlas of North American English. The results of the analysis both confirm and challenge the results of the Atlas. Most notably, while the analysis identifies similar patterns as the Atlas in the West and the Southeast, the analysis finds that the Midwest and the Northeast are distinct dialect regions that are considerably stronger than the traditional Midland dialect region identified in the Atlas. The analysis also finds evidence that a vowel shift is actively shaping the language of the Western United States.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A multivariate spatial analysis of vowel formants in American English
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A multivariate spatial analysis of vowel formants in American English
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A multivariate spatial analysis of vowel formants in American English
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Address for correspondence: Jack Grieve, Lecturer in Forensic Linguistics, Centre for Forensic Linguistics, School of Languages and Social Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle B4 7ET, Birmingham, UK. Email j.grieve1@aston.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Carver, Craig M. 1987. American regional dialects. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Conn, Jeffrey C. 2000. The story of /ae/ in Portland. Portland, OR: Portland State University thesis.
Di Paolo, Marianna. 1988. Pronunciation and categorization in sound change. In Ferrara, K., Brown, B., Walters, K. & Baugh, J. (eds), Linguistic Change and Contact: Sixteenth Annual Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation, 8492. Austin, TX: Department of Linguistics, University of Texas.
Fought, Carmen. 1999. A majority sound change in a minority community: /u/-fronting in Chicano English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3: 523.
Fridland, Valerie. 2008. Patterns of /uw/, /upsilon/, and /ow/ fronting in Reno, Nevada. American Speech 83: 432454.
Goebl, Hans. 1982. Dialektometrie; Prinzipien und Methoden des Einsatzes der numerischen Taxonomie im Bereich der Dialektgeographie. Vienna: Verlag der Osterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Goebl, Hans. 2006. Recent advances is Salzburg dialectometry. Literary and Linguistic Computing 21: 411435.
Gordon, Matthew J. 2002. Investigating chain shifts and mergers. In Chambers, J., Trudgill, P. & Schilling-Estes, N. (eds), The handbook of language variation and change, 245266. London: Blackwell.
Grieve, Jack. 2009. A corpus-based regional dialect survey of grammatical variation in written Standard American English. San Francisco, AZ: Northern Arizona University dissertation.
Grieve, Jack. 2011. A regional analysis of contraction rate in written standard American English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16: 514546.
Grieve, Jack. 2012. A statistical analysis of regional variation in adverb position in a corpus of written standard American English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8: 3972.
Grieve, Jack. 2013. A statistical comparison of regional phonetic and lexical variation in American English. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8: 82107.
Grieve, Jack, Speelman, Dirk & Geeraerts, Dirk. 2011. A statistical method for the identification and aggregation of regional linguistic variation. Language Variation and Change 23: 193221.
Jr.Hair, Joseph F. Black, William C. Babin, Barry J. Anderson, Rolph E. Tatham, Ronald L. 2006. Multivariate data analysis, 6th edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hall-Lew, Lauren. 2004. The western vowel shift in Northern Arizona. Unpublished Manuscript. http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~lhlew/index.html, Accessed 8 July, 2013 .
Hall-Lew, Lauren. 2005. One shift, two groups: When fronting alone is not enough. In M. Baranowski, U. Horesh, K. Evans & G. Nguyen (eds), Selected papers from NWAV 32: 105116. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 10.2.
Heeringa, Wilbert J. 2004. Measuring dialect pronunciation differences using Levenshtein distance. Groningen: University of Groningen dissertation.
Hinton, Leanne, Moonwomon, Birch, Bremner, Sue, Luthin, Herb, Van Clay, Mary, Lerner, Jean & Corcoran, Hazel. 1987. It's not just valley girls: A study of California English. In J. Aske, N. Beery, L. Michaelis & H. Filip (eds), Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 117127. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Koops, Christian. 2010. /u/-fronting is not Monolithic: Two types of fronted /u/ in Houston anglos. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 16. Article 14. http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol16/iss2/14.
Kurath, Hans. 1949. Word geography of the eastern United States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Labov, William. 2004. Principles of linguistic change, internal factors. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon & Boberg, Charles. 2006. Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology, and sound change. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Moran, P. A. P. 1948. The interpretation of statistical maps. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 37: 243251.
Nerbonne, John. 2006. Identifying linguistic structure in aggregate comparison. Literary and Linguistic Computing 21: 463476.
Nerbonne, John & Heeringa, Wilbert J. 2009. Measuring dialect differences. In Auer, P. & Schmidt, J. E. (eds), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic varaition, Vol. 1: Theories and Methods (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 30.1), 550567. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Odland, John D. 1988. Spatial autocorrelation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Ord, J. K. & Getis, Arthur. 1995. Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: Distributional issues and an application. Geographical Analysis 27: 286306.
Prokić, Jelena & Nerbonne, John. 2008. Recognizing groups among dialects. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 1: 153172.
Séguy, Jean. 1971. La relation entre la distance spatiale et la distance lexicale. Revue de linguistique romane 35: 335357.
Séguy, Jean. 1973. La dialectométrie dans l'Atlas linguistique de la Gascogne. Revue de linguistique romane 37: 124.
Ward, Joe H. Jr. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58: 236244.
Ward, Michael. 2003. Portland Dialect Study: The Fronting of /ow, u, uw/ in Portland, Oregon. Portland, OR: Portland State University thesis.
Wieling, Martijn & Nerbonne, John. 2010. Hierarchical bipartite spectral graph partitioning to cluster dialect varieties and determine their most important linguistic features. TextGraphs-5 Workshop on Graph-Based Methods for NLP 16: 3341.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistic Geography
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2049-7547
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistic-geography
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 49
Total number of PDF views: 243 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 499 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.