Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Regional differences in the perception of a consonant change in progress

  • Anne-France Pinget (a1), René Kager (a1) and Hans Van de Velde (a2)
Abstract

This study aims at testing whether there are regional differences in the perception of the labiodental fricative contrast in Dutch. Previous production studies have shown that the devoicing of initial labiodental fricatives is a change in progress in the Dutch language area. We present the results of a speeded identification task in which fricative stimuli were systematically varied for two phonetic cues, voicing and duration. Listeners (n=100) were regionally stratified, and the regions (k=5) reflect different stages of this sound change in progress. Voicing turned out to be the strongest categorization cue in all regions; duration only played a minor role. Regional differences showed up in the perception of the consonantal contrast that matched regional differences in production reported in previous studies. The addition of random slopes in the mixed model regression showed the importance of within-regional variation.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Regional differences in the perception of a consonant change in progress
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Regional differences in the perception of a consonant change in progress
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Regional differences in the perception of a consonant change in progress
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author: Anne-France Pinget, a.c.h.Pinget@uu.nl, Tel: +31 30 253 6049, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Universiteit Utrecht, Trans 10, 3512 JK Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Dale J. Barr , Roger Levy , Christoph Scheepers & Harry J. Tily . 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3). 255-278.

Paul Boersma & Silke Hamann . 2008. The evolution of auditory dispersion in bidirectional constraint grammars. Phonology 25. 217-270.

Paola Escudero & Paul Boersma . 2004. Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26. 4):551-585.

Paola Escudero , Ellen Simon & Holger Mitterer . 2012. The perception of English front vowels by North Holland and Flemish listeners: Acoustic similarity predicts and explains cross-linguistic and L2 perception. Journal of Phonetics 40. 280-288.

Naomi H. Feldman , Tom L. Griffiths & James L. Morgan . 2009. The influence of categories on perception: Explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference. Psychological Review 116. 4):752-782.

James Emil Flege , Naoyuki Takagi & Virginia Mann . 1996. Lexical familiarity and English-language experience affect Japanese adults’ perception of /r/ and /l/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99. 1161-1173.

Robert Allen Fox , James Emil Flege & Murray J. Munro . 1995. The perception of English and Spanish vowels by native English and Spanish listeners: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97(4). 2540-2550.

Frank H. Guenther & Marin N. Gjaja . 1996. The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100. 1111-1121.

Susan G. Guion , Tetsuo Harada & J. J. Clark . 2004. Early and late Spanish-English bilinguals’ acquisition of English word stress patterns. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7. 207-226.

Pierre A. Hallé , Yueh-Chin Chang & Catherine T. Best . 2004. Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics 32. 395-421.

Yukari Hirata . 2004. Training native English speakers to perceive Japanese length contrasts in word versus sentence contexts. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 116(4). 2384-2394.

Tyler Kendall & Valerie Fridland . 2012. Variation in the production and perception of mid front vowels in the US Southern Vowel Shift. Journal of Phonetics 40(2). 289-306.

Patricia K Kuhl . 1991. Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics 50(2). 93-107.

P. K. Kuhl , Karen A. Williams , Francisco Lacerda , Kenneth N. Stevens & Björn Lindblom . 1992. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 255. 606-608.

Peter Ladefoged & Donald E. Broadbent . 1957. Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 29(1). 98-104.

Robert McAllister , James Emil Flege & Thorsten Piske . 2002. The influence of L1 on the acquisition of Swedish quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English and Estonian. Journal of Phonetics 30(2). 229-258.

David B Pisoni . 1975. Auditory short-term memory and vowel perception. Memory & Cognition 3(1). 7-18.

Bruno H Repp . 1984. Categorical perception: Issues, methods, findings. Speech and Language: Advances in basic research and practice 10. 243-335.

R. J. H Van den Berg . 1989. Perception of voicing in Dutch two-obstruent sequences: Covariation of voicing cues. Speech Communication 8. 17-25.

R. J. H. Van den Berg & Iman H. Slis . 1985. Perception of Assimilation of Voice as a Function of Segmental Duration and Linguistic Context. Phonetica 42. 25-38.

Hans Van de Velde , Marinel Gerritsen & Roeland van Hout . 1996. The devoicing of fricatives in standard Dutch: A real time study based on radio recordings. Language Variation and Change 8(2). 149-175.

Hans Van de Velde , Roeland van Hout & Marinel Gerritsen . 1997. Watching Dutch Change. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1(3). 361-391.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistic Geography
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2049-7547
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistic-geography
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 20
Total number of PDF views: 57 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 233 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th April 2017 - 25th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.