Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Regional differences in the perception of a consonant change in progress

  • Anne-France Pinget (a1), René Kager (a1) and Hans Van de Velde (a2)
Abstract

This study aims at testing whether there are regional differences in the perception of the labiodental fricative contrast in Dutch. Previous production studies have shown that the devoicing of initial labiodental fricatives is a change in progress in the Dutch language area. We present the results of a speeded identification task in which fricative stimuli were systematically varied for two phonetic cues, voicing and duration. Listeners (n=100) were regionally stratified, and the regions (k=5) reflect different stages of this sound change in progress. Voicing turned out to be the strongest categorization cue in all regions; duration only played a minor role. Regional differences showed up in the perception of the consonantal contrast that matched regional differences in production reported in previous studies. The addition of random slopes in the mixed model regression showed the importance of within-regional variation.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Regional differences in the perception of a consonant change in progress
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Regional differences in the perception of a consonant change in progress
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Regional differences in the perception of a consonant change in progress
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author: Anne-France Pinget, a.c.h.Pinget@uu.nl, Tel: +31 30 253 6049, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Universiteit Utrecht, Trans 10, 3512 JK Utrecht, The Netherlands.
References
Hide All
Barr Dale J., Levy Roger, Scheepers Christoph & Tily Harry J.. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3). 255-278.
Benkí José R. 2005. Perception of VOT and first formant onset by Spanish and English speakers. In James Cohen, Kara McAlister, Kellie Rolstad, Jeff MacSwan (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism, 240–248. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Boersma Paul & Hamann Silke. 2008. The evolution of auditory dispersion in bidirectional constraint grammars. Phonology 25. 217-270.
Boersma Paul & Weenink David. 2014. Praat: doing phonetics by computer. http://www.praat.org/ (2 December 2014).
Debrock M. 1977. An acoustic correlate of the force of articulation. Journal of Phonetics 5. 61-80.
Debrock M. 1978. Is the fortis-lenis feature really redundant in Dutch? Leuvense Bijdragen 67. 457-472.
Escudero Paola & Boersma Paul. 2004. Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26. 4):551-585.
Escudero Paola, Simon Ellen & Mitterer Holger. 2012. The perception of English front vowels by North Holland and Flemish listeners: Acoustic similarity predicts and explains cross-linguistic and L2 perception. Journal of Phonetics 40. 280-288.
Feldman Naomi H., Griffiths Tom L. & Morgan James L.. 2009. The influence of categories on perception: Explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference. Psychological Review 116. 4):752-782.
Flege James Emil, Takagi Naoyuki & Mann Virginia. 1996. Lexical familiarity and English-language experience affect Japanese adults’ perception of /r/ and /l/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99. 1161-1173.
Fox Robert Allen, Flege James Emil & Munro Murray J.. 1995. The perception of English and Spanish vowels by native English and Spanish listeners: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97(4). 2540-2550.
Fry Dennis Butler, Abramson Arthur S., Eimas Peter D. & Liberman Alvin M.. 1962. The identification and discrimination of synthetic vowels. Language and Speech 5(4). 171-189.
Gandour Jackson T. & Harshman Richard A.. 1978. Crosslanguage differences in tone perception: A multidimensional scaling investigation. Language and Speech 21(1). 1-33.
Goldinger Stephen D. 1997. Words and voices—perception and production in an episodic lexicon. In Keith Johnson & John W. Mullennix (eds.), Talker Variability in Speech Processing, 33-66. San Diego: Academic Press.
Guenther Frank H. & Gjaja Marin N.. 1996. The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100. 1111-1121.
Guion Susan G., Flege James Emil, Akahane-Yamada Reiko & Pruitt Jesica C.. 2000. An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107. 2711-2724.
Guion Susan G., Harada Tetsuo & Clark J. J.. 2004. Early and late Spanish-English bilinguals’ acquisition of English word stress patterns. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7. 207-226.
Gussenhoven Carlos & Bremmer Rolf H.. 1983. Voiced fricatives in Dutch: Sources and present-day usage. North-Western European Language Evolution 2. 55-71.
Hallé Pierre A., Chang Yueh-Chin & Best Catherine T.. 2004. Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics 32. 395-421.
Hirata Yukari. 2004. Training native English speakers to perceive Japanese length contrasts in word versus sentence contexts. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 116(4). 2384-2394.
Janson Tore. 1983. Sound change in perception and production. Language. 18-34.
Johnson Keith. 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In Keith Johnson & John W. Mullennix (eds.), Talker Variability in Speech Processing. 145-165. San Diego: Academic Press.
Kendall Tyler & Fridland Valerie. 2012. Variation in the production and perception of mid front vowels in the US Southern Vowel Shift. Journal of Phonetics 40(2). 289-306.
Kissine Mikhail, Van de Velde Hans & Hout Roeland van. 2003. The devoicing of fricatives in standard Dutch. In Paula Fikkert & Leonie Cornips (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands, 2003. 93-104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kuhl Patricia K. 1991. Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics 50(2). 93-107.
Kuhl P. K., Williams Karen A., Lacerda Francisco, Stevens Kenneth N. & Lindblom Björn. 1992. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 255. 606-608.
Labov William. 1994. Principles of language change: Internal factors (Vol. 1). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ladefoged Peter & Broadbent Donald E.. 1957. Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 29(1). 98-104.
Liberman Alvin M., Harris Katherine S., Hoffman H. S. & Griffith B. C.. 1957. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology 54(5). 358.
McAllister Robert, Flege James Emil & Piske Thorsten. 2002. The influence of L1 on the acquisition of Swedish quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English and Estonian. Journal of Phonetics 30(2). 229-258.
Mitterer Holger. 2009. Research stuff. http://www.holgermitterer.eu/research.html. (2 December 2014).
Pinget Anne-France. 2015. The actuation of sound change. Utrecht: Utrecht University, LOT series PhD Thesis.
Pisoni David B. 1975. Auditory short-term memory and vowel perception. Memory & Cognition 3(1). 7-18.
Repp Bruno H. 1984. Categorical perception: Issues, methods, findings. Speech and Language: Advances in basic research and practice 10. 243-335.
Slis Iman H. & Cohen Antonie. 1969. On complex regulating voiced–voiceless distinction. Language and Speech 12(2). 80-102.
Slis Iman H. & Heugten Marieke van. 1989. Voiced-voiceless distinction in Dutch fricatives. Linguistics in the Netherlands 6. 123-132.
Thomas Erik R. 2011. Collecting data on phonology. In W. Maguire & A. McMahon (eds.), Analysing Variation in English, 7-29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van den Berg R. J. H. 1989. Perception of voicing in Dutch two-obstruent sequences: Covariation of voicing cues. Speech Communication 8. 17-25.
Van den Berg R. J. H. & Slis Iman H.. 1985. Perception of Assimilation of Voice as a Function of Segmental Duration and Linguistic Context. Phonetica 42. 25-38.
Van der Harst Sander. 2011. The vowel space paradox. A sociophonetic study on Dutch. Utrecht: Utrecht University, LOT series PhD Thesis.
Van de Velde Hans, Gerritsen Marinel & van Hout Roeland. 1996. The devoicing of fricatives in standard Dutch: A real time study based on radio recordings. Language Variation and Change 8(2). 149-175.
Van de Velde Hans, van Hout Roeland & Gerritsen Marinel. 1997. Watching Dutch Change. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1(3). 361-391.
Van Reenen Pieter T. 1994. Driemaal /r/ in de Nederlandse dialecten. Taal en Tongval 46. 54-72.
Van Reenen Pieter T. & Wattel Evert. 1992. De uitspraak van /s/ en /z/ voor klinker in het Nederlands: zes eeuwen variatie. In Bennis Hans & Jan W. de Vries (eds.), De Binnenbouw van het Nederlands, Een bundel artikelen voor Piet Paardekooper, 291-309. Dordrecht: ICG Publications.
Willis Clodius. 1972. Perception of vowel phonemes in Fort Erie, Ontario, Canada, and Buffalo, New York: An application of synthetic vowel categorization tests to dialectology. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 15. 246-255.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistic Geography
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2049-7547
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistic-geography
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 30
Total number of PDF views: 99 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 340 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th April 2017 - 19th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.