Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-558cb97cc8-4xlcd Total loading time: 0.58 Render date: 2022-10-07T00:06:51.672Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

On wh-exclamatives and gradability: An argument from Romance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2019

ELENA CASTROVIEJO*
Affiliation:
Ikerbasque and UPV/EHU
*
Author’s address: Centro de Investigación Micaela Portilla Ikergunea (UPV/EHU), Justo Vélez de Elorriaga, 1, 01006 - Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spainelena.castroviejo@ehu.eus

Abstract

This paper discusses a type of wh-exclamative whose wh-component and degree component do not seem to go hand in hand. These are wh-exclamatives in Catalan whose moved wh-phrase is headed by the determiner quin ‘what, which’, and whose NP contains an optional DegP headed by tan ‘so’ or més ‘more’. By taking a closer look at these wh-exclamatives, we will be able to contribute to the debate on the role of gradability and of the wh-component in the semantics of wh-exclamatives. My claim is that the DegP in these wh-exclamatives leaves behind a degree variable that is ultimately bound by an expressive speech act operator. Following Castroviejo (2006) and building on Rett (2009), I adhere to the claim that wh-exclamatives in Catalan are necessarily scalar as a requirement of the expressive operator. Moreover, as a downward-monotonic operator, I show that it licenses upward-directed inferences, which ensures that wh-exclamatives express unexpectedness toward a high degree.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am indebted to three anonymous JoL reviewers, who have thoroughly and critically read the previous versions of this paper. This is – hopefully – a much clearer and sensible article thanks to them. Of course, I am fully responsible for any remaining mistakes. This research has been partially supported by project VASTRUD (PGC2018-096870-B-I00), funded by the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MiCIU) / Spanish Research Agency (AEI) and the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER, UE), the IT1396-19 Research Group (Basque Government), and UFI11/14 (University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU).

References

Bosque, Ignacio. 1996. On degree quantification and modal structures. In Parodi, Claudia, Quicoli, Carlos, Saltarelli, Mario & Luisa Zubizarreta, María (eds.), Aspects of romance linguistic. Selected papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XXIV March 10–13, 1994, 87106. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1973. The syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4, 275343.Google Scholar
Brucart, Josep M. & Rigau, Gemma. 2002. La quantificació. In Solà, Mascaró, Rosa Lloret & Pérez Saldanya (eds.), 1517–1589.Google Scholar
Burnett, Heather. 2010. Pitch accent, focus, and the interpretation of non-wh exclamatives in French. In Colina, Sonia, Olarrea, Antxon & Maria Carvallo, Ana (eds.), Romance linguistics 2009. Selected papers from the 39th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Tucson, Arizona, March 2009, 369386. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Castroviejo, Elena. 2006. Wh-exclamatives in Catalan. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Barcelona,https://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/mU5NDRmM/.Google Scholar
Castroviejo, Elena. 2007. A degree-based account of wh-exclamatives in Catalan. In Puig-Waldmüller, Estela (ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11, 134149. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Castroviejo, Elena. 2008. Deconstructing exclamations. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 7, 4190.Google Scholar
Castroviejo, Elena. 2010. An expressive answer. Some considerations on the semantics and pragmatics of wh-exclamatives. In McNabb, Yaron, Bane, Max, Bueno-Holle, Juan-José, Grano, Thomas & Grotberg, April (eds.), Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS), vol. 44.2, 317.Google Scholar
Castroviejo, Elena. 2011. ‘So’ as a weak degree expression. In Ashton, Neil, Chereches, Anca & Lutz, David (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 21, 7694. Washington, DC: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Chernilovskaya, Anna & Nouwen, Rick. 2012. On wh-exclamatives and noteworthiness. In Aloni, Maria, Kimmelman, Vadim, Roelofsen, Floris, Sassoon, Galit W., Schulz, Katrin & Westera, Matthijs (eds.), Logic, Language and Meaning 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, December 19–21, 2011, Revised Selected Papers, 271280. Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Cresswell, Max. 1976. The semantics of degree. In Partee, Barbara (ed.), Montague grammar, 261292. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta. 2008. Meaning-form correlations and adjective position in Spanish. In McNally, Louise & Kennedy, Christopher (eds.), Adjectives and adverbs. Syntax, semantics and discourse, 71100. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta & Fernández-Soriano, Olga. 2009. Force and finiteness in the Spanish complementizer system. Probus 21.1, 2349.Google Scholar
Elliott, Dale E. 1974. Toward a grammar of exclamatives. Foundations of Language 11, 231246.Google Scholar
Gérard, Josselyne. 1980. L’exclamation en français. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan & Sag, Ivan. 2001. Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning and use of English interrogatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1979. Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10.2, 279326.Google Scholar
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Stokhof, Martin. 1988. Type-shifting rules and the semantics of interrogatives. In Chierchia, G., Partee, B.B.H. & Turner, R. (eds.), Properties, types and meaning: Volume II: Semantic issues, vol. 2, 2168. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Grosz, Patrick. 2012. On the grammar of optative constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 1996. The semantics of exclamatives. In Garret, E. & Lee, F. (eds.), Syntax at sunset (UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics), UCLA.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier & Andueza, Patricia. 2016. The pragmatics of embedded exclamatives. In Capone, Alessandro & Mey, Jacob L. (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society, 767790. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Hamblin, C. L. 1973. Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10, 4153.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1985. Notes on comparatives and related matters. Ms., University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 2000. Degree operators and scope. In Jackson, Brendan & Mathews, Tanya (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 10, 4064. Cornell, NY: Cornell University CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Pauline. 1995. On the quantificational force of English free relatives. In Bach, Emmon, Jelinek, Eloise, Kratzer, Angelika & Partee, Barbara H. (eds.), Quantification in natural languages. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Kaplan, David. 1999. The meaning of ouchand oops. Explorations in the theory of meaning as use. 2004 version. Ms., UCLA.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1977. Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics & Philosophy 1, 344.Google Scholar
Katz, Graham. 2005. Attitudes toward degrees. In Maier, Emar, Bary, Corien & Huitink, Janneke (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9, 183196. Nijmegen: Nijmegen Centre of Semantics (NCS).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher. 1997. Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher. 1999. Projecting the adjective. The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher. 2007a. Modes of comparison. In Elliott, Malcolm, Kirby, James, Sawada, Osamu, Staraki, Eleni & Yoon, Suwon (eds.), Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS), vol. 43, 141165. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher. 2007b. Vagueness and grammar. Linguistics & Philosophy 30.1, 145.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & McNally, Louise. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81.2, 345381.Google Scholar
Klein, Ewan. 1980. Semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics & Philosophy 4, 145.Google Scholar
Martin, Fabienne. 2014. Restrictive vs. nonrestrictive modification and evaluative predicates. Lingua 149A, 3454.Google Scholar
Masià, Melània S.2017. Adverbial adjectives and nominal scalarity. Ph.D. dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, http://hdl.handle.net/10803/403806.Google Scholar
Meier, Cécile. 2003. The meaning of too, enoughand so…that. Natural Language Semantics 11, 69107.Google Scholar
Morzycki, Marcin. 2008. Adverbial modification of adjectives: Evaluatives and a little beyond. In Dölling, Johannes, Heyde-Zybatow, Tatjana & Schäfer, Martin (eds.), Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation, 103126. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Morzycki, Marcin. 2012. Adjectival extremeness: Degree modification and contextually restricted scales. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30.2, 567609.Google Scholar
Murray, Sarah. 2014. Varieties of updates. Semantics and Pragmatics 7.2, 153.Google Scholar
Nouwen, Rick. 2005. Monotone amazement. In Dekker, Paul & Franke, Michael (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Amsterdam Colloquium, 167172. Amsterdam: ILLC Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Nouwen, Rick. 2011. Degree modifiers and monotonicity. In Égré, Paul & Klinedinst, Nathan (eds.), Vagueness and language use, 146164. Houndmills: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Nouwen, Rick & Chernilovskaya, Anna. 2015. Two types of exclamatives. Linguistic Variation 15.2, 201224.Google Scholar
Picallo, Carme. 1994. A mark of specificity in indefinite numerals. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 4, 143167.Google Scholar
Portner, Paul & Zanuttini, Raffaella. 2005. Nominal exclamatives in English. In Elugardo, Reinaldo & Stainton, Robert J. (eds.), Ellipsis and non-sentential speech, 5767. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar. 2002. L’entonació. In Solà, Mascaró, Rosa Lloret & Pérez Saldanya (eds.), 393–462.Google Scholar
Rett, Jessica. 2008. Degree modification in natural language. Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Rett, Jessica. 2009. A degree account of exclamatives. In Friedman, Tova & Ito, Satoshi (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 18, 601618. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Rett, Jessica. 2011. Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Linguistics & Philosophy 34.5, 411442.Google Scholar
Rett, Jessica. 2013. Similatives and the argument structure of verbs. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31.4, 11011137.Google Scholar
Rett, Jessica. 2014. The polysemy of measurement. Lingua 143, 242266.Google Scholar
Rett, Jessica. 2019. Separate but equal: a typology of equative constructions. Ms., UCLA.Google Scholar
Roberts, Craige. 1996. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. OSUWPL Volume 49: Papers in Semantics, 91136. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger. 2008. The semantics of comparatives and other degree constructions. Language & Linguistics Compass 2.2, 308331.Google Scholar
Seuren, Pieter A.M. 1984. The comparative revisited. Journal of Semantics 3, 109141.Google Scholar
Solà, Joan, Mascaró, Joan, Rosa Lloret, M. & Pérez Saldanya, Manuel (eds.). 2002. Gramàtica del català contemporani. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
von Stechow, Arnim. 1984. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3, 177.Google Scholar
Tovena, Lucia. 2001. Between mass and count. In Megerdoomian, Karine & Ann Bar-el, Leora (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL, vol. 20, 565578. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Portner, Paul. 2003. Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79, 3981.Google Scholar
1
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

On wh-exclamatives and gradability: An argument from Romance
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

On wh-exclamatives and gradability: An argument from Romance
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

On wh-exclamatives and gradability: An argument from Romance
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *