Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wjfd9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T18:21:43.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonological structure and ‘expressiveness’1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Erik Fudge
Erik Fudge
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Words of certain semantic types which can be subsumed under the label ‘expressive’ (notably onomatopoeias, movement words, and words with pejorative, jocular, or intense connotations) have a tendency in a wide range of languages to be associated with peculiarities of phonological structure – these peculiarities include types of sounds, sound-sequences and syllable-structures which can be regarded as peripheral in the language concerned.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , September 1970 , pp. 161 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Austerlitz, R. (1967). The distributional identification of Finnish morphophonemes. Lg. 43. 20–33.Google Scholar
Bernard-Thierry, S. (1960). Les onomatopées en malgache. BSL 55. 240–269.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. L. (1950). Rime, assonance, and morpheme analysis. Word. 6 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1964). Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. (Janua Linguarum, series minor, 38). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1965). Some controversial questions in phonological theory. JL 1. 97–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doke, C. M. (1931). A Comparative Study of Shona Phonetics. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand Press.Google Scholar
Doke, C. M. (1935). Bantu Linguistic Terminology. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1935). The use and distribution of certain English sounds. English Studies 17. 8–18; also in Firth, 1957: 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics, 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fudge, E. C. (1969), Syllables. JL 5. 253–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grammont, M. (1901). Onomatopées et mots expressifs. RLR 44. 97–158.Google Scholar
Householder, F. W. (1965). On some recent claims in phonological theory. JL 1. 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. H. (1960). Phonological aspects of style: some English sonnets. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.) Style in Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 109–131.Google Scholar
Kunene, D. P. (1965) The ideophone in Southern Sotho - I. JAL 4. 19–39.Google Scholar
Tay, M. W. J. (1968). A Phonological Study of Hokkien. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Thun, N. (1963). Reduplicative Words in English. Stockholm: Ab Studentbok.Google Scholar
Twaddell, W. F. (1939; 1941). Combinations of consonants in stressed syllables in German. AL 1. 189–199; 2. 31–50.Google Scholar
Uhlenbeck, E. M. (1950). The structure of the Javanese morpheme. Lingua 2. 239–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar