Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-glrdx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T15:57:38.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks on transitivity1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Tasaku Tsunoda
Tasaku Tsunoda
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Letters, University of Nagoya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Hopper & Thompson (1980) is an important contribution on the issue of transitivity, in which they propose that transitivity consists of the following ten semantic parameters:

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , September 1985 , pp. 385 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, S. R. (1976). On the notion of subject in ergative languages. In Li, C. N. (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press. 1–23.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1975). Ergativity in Caucasian languages. (Unpublished paper.) Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1978). Ergativity. In Lehmann, W. P. (ed.), Syntactic typology. Austin: University of Texas Press. 329–394.Google Scholar
DeLancey, S. (1981). An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Lg 57. 626–657.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1979). Ergativity. Lg 55. 59–138.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1981). Typology and functional domains. Studies in Language 5. 163–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, J. S. (1967). Look and see. Lg 43. 937–947.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & Thompson, S. A. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Lg 56. 251–299.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1924). The philosophy of grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Klaiman, M. H. (1981). Toward a universal semantics of indirect subject. BLS 7. 123–135.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1977). Linguistic gestalts. CLS 20. 236–287.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. (1981). Transitivity and foregrounding in the North Caucasus. BLS 7. 202–221.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1966). General linguistics (3rd impression). London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M. (1982). Japanese grammar and universal grammar. Lingua 57. 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiratsuki, N. (n.d.). On ergativity in Basque. (Unpublished paper.) Kyoto: University of Kyoto.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies; and New Jersey: Humanities Press. 112–171.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, T. (1974). A grammar of the Warungu language. North Queensland. M.A. thesis. Melbourne: Monash University.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, T. (1980). Nookakusei ni okeru aru imijooken to keesu-makingu. (A certain semantic condition and case-making in ergativity.) Gengo Kenkyuu 78. 141–152.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, T. (1981a). The Djaru language of Kimberley, Western Australia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, T. (1981b). Split case-marking patterns in verb-types and tense/aspect/mood. Linguistics 19. 389–438.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, T. (1981c). Interaction of phonological, grammatical, and semantic factors: an Australian example. Oceanic Linguistics 20. 45–92.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, T. (1983). A re-definition of ‘ergativo’ and ‘accusative’. In Hattori, S. et al. (eds), Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguists (Tokyo 1982). Tokyo: Sanseidoo. 962–966.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, T. (forthcoming). Antipassives in Warrungu and other Australian languages. To appear in Shibatani, M. (ed.), Passives and voicing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (In press.)Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1981). Case marking and human nature. Australian Journal of Linguistics 1. 43–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamada, M. (1981). M. Silverstein no hierarchy wa nihongo ni oite dono yooni jitsugen sarete iru ka. (How M. Silverstein's hierarchy is reflected in Japanese.) B.A. thesis. Nagoya: University of Nagoya.Google Scholar