Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-nzrtw Total loading time: 0.994 Render date: 2022-12-05T11:55:31.689Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

A representational parameter for onsetless syllables1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2013

GEOFFREY SCHWARTZ*
Affiliation:
Adam Mickiewicz University
*
Author's address: Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, al. Niepodległości 4, 61-874 Poznań, Polandgeoff@wa.amu.edu.pl

Abstract

Syllables without consonantal onsets may be invisible for stress-assignment, reduplication, or tone. Many authors attribute this behavior to some sort of prosodic deficiency, while having little to say about cases in which onsetless syllables act as well-formed constituents. In the Onset Prominence (OP) representational environment, the ambiguous behavior of onsetless syllables is explained by means of a single representational parameter. Prosodically active initial vowels are assumed to be specified for the Vocalic Onset (VO) layer of structure, a specification lacking in prosodically inert onsetless syllables. Diverse phonological implications of VO specification for KiKerewe, Eastern Arrernte, Tashlhiyt Berber and Polish are examined. In the case of Polish, phonetic data on the glottalization of initial vowels provide additional support for the representational proposal. Finally, the place of the OP environment within the context of modern phonological theory is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[1]

I would like to thank Cormac Anderson for bringing to my attention much of the data discussed in this paper. Thanks also go to Jennifer L. Smith for the intense grilling of my poster presentation on onsetless syllables at the 20th Manchester Phonology Meeting (2012). I would also like to thank two anonymous Journal of Linguistics referees as well the editors. This paper builds on an analysis developed in Schwartz (2012a). All errors are my own responsibility.

References

REFERENCES

Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary Phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, Gavan & Pensalfini, Rob. 1999. Arrernte – a language with no syllable onsets. Linguistic Inquiry 30.1, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, Charles. 2002. Foot and syllable in Southern Paiute. Ms., City University of New York. http://www.cunyphonologyforum.net/papers/20Sopai.pdf (accessed 18 July 2012).Google Scholar
Carlton, Terence. 1990. Introduction to the phonological history of the Slavic languages. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. 1997. Berber syllabification: Derivations or constraints? In Roca, Iggy (ed.), Derivations and constraints in phonology, 289330. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Dell, François & Elmedlaoui, Mohamed. 1985. Syllabic consonants and syllabification in Imdlawn Tashlhiyt Berber. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 7, 105130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, François & Elmedlaoui, Mohamed. 1988. Syllabic consonants in Berber: Some new evidence. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 10, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilley, Laura, Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stephanie & Ostendorf, Marc. 1996. Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure. Journal of Phonetics 24, 423444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dogil, Grzegorz. 1999. The phonetic manifestation of word stress in Polish, Lithuanian, Spanish, and German. In van der Hulst, Harry (ed.), Word prosodic systems in the languages of Europe, 273311. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Downing, Laura. 1998. On the prosodic misalignment of onsetless syllables. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16, 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukiewicz, Leonida & Sawicka, Irena. 1995. Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego – fonetyka i fonologia [Grammar of modern Polish: Phonetics and phonology]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Języka Polskiego PAN.Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel. 1996. Syllable integrity. ROA 163-1196. http://roa.rutgers.edu/ (accessed 18 July 2012).Google Scholar
Golston, Chris & Hulst, Harry van der. 1999. Stricture is structure. In Hermans, Ben & Oostendorp, Marc van (eds.), The derivational residue in phonological Optimality Theory, 153173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2005. A perceptually-driven account of onset-sensitive stress. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23, 595653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussmann, Edmund. 2007. The phonology of Polish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Katherine, Hoffman, Howard, Liberman, Alvin, Delattre, Pierre & Cooper, Franklin. 1958. Effect of third-formant transitions on the perception of voiced stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 30.2, 122126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 253306.Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, James & Houde, Robert. 1996. The role of f0 and amplitude in the perception of intervocalic glottal stops. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 39, 11821190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulst, Harry van der. 2010. A note on recursion in phonology. In van der Hulst, Harry (ed.), Recursion and human language, 301342. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry. (1985). A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Îto, Junko. 1988. Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Kager, René. 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Lowenstamm, Jean & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1990. Constituent structure and government in phonology. Phonology 7, 193231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Levi, Susannah. 2008. Phonemic vs. derived glides. Lingua 118, 19561978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlett, Stephen & Stemberger, Josepch. 1983. Empty consonants in Seri. Linguistic Inquiry 14, 617639.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John & Prince, Alan. 1993. Prosodic morphology: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms., University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Irene, Vogel 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Odden, David. 1995. Onsetless syllables in KiKerewe. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 47, 89110.Google Scholar
Odden, David. 1996. Patterns of reduplication in KiKerewe. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 48, 111149.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, Carrie S., Hendrik, Robert A. & Miller, Mary Frances (eds.), Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS) 17: Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, 178203. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Pöchtrager, Markus. 2006. The structure of length. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Port, Robert & Dalby, Jonathan. 1982. C/V ratio as a cue for voicing in English. Perception & Psychophysics 2, 141152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms., Technical Reports of the Rutgers University, Center for Cognitive Science. [ROA 537, September 2003]Google Scholar
Raimy, Eric & Cairns, Charles (eds.). 2009. Contemporary views on architecture and representations in phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redi, Laura & Stephanie, Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2001. Variation in the realization of glottalization in normal speakers. Journal of Phonetics 29, 407429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridouane, Rachid. 2008. Syllables without vowels: Phonetic and phonological evidence from Tashlhiyt Berber. Phonology 25, 321359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2003. Polish palatalization in derivational Optimality Theory. Lingua 113, 197237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy & Booij, Geert. (1990). Syllable structure assignment in Polish. Phonology 7, 121158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheer, Tobias. 2004. A lateral theory of phonology: What is CVCV and why should it be? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheer, Tobias. 2008. Why the Prosodic Hierarchy is a diacritic and why the Interface must be direct. In Hartmann, Jutta, Hegedüs, Veronika & Riemsdijk, Henk van (eds.), Sounds of silence: Empty elements in syntax and phonology, 145192. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias. 2009. External sandhi: What the initial CV is initial of. Studi e Saggi Linguistici 47, 4382.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Geoffrey. 2010a. Auditory representations and the structures of GP 2.0. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57, 381397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Geoffrey. 2010b. Phonology in the signal: Unifying cue and prosodic licensing. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46.4, 499518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Geoffrey. 2012a. What is an onsetless syllable? Poster presentation at the 20th Manchester Phonology Meeting, 25 May 2012.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Geoffrey. 2012b. Tashlhiyt Berber syllabification within the Onset Prominence representational environment. Ms., Adam Mickiewicz University.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Geoffrey. 2012c. Initial glottalization and final devoicing in Polish English. Research in Langauge 10, 159172.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Geoffrey. 2013. Phonetic evidence for VO specification in Polish initial vowels. Poster presentation at the 10th Old World Conference in Phonology, 16–19 January 2013, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Sluijter, Agaath M. C. & van Heuven, Vincent J.. 1996. Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100, 24712485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, Jennifer. 2002. Phonological augmentation in prominent positions. Ph.D dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer. 2012. The formal definition of the Onset constraint and implications for Korean syllable structure. Ms., University of North Carlolina at Chapel Hill. http://www.unc.edu/∼jlsmith/home/pubs.html (accessed 17 November 2011).Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1993. Closure, release, and nasal contours. In Huffman, Marie K. & Krakow, Rena A. (eds.), Nasals, nasalization, and the velum, 401470. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1997. Phonetics in phonology: The case of laryngeal neutralization. Ms. University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1997. Articulatory–acoustic–auditory relationships. In Hardcastle, William J., Laver, John & Gibbon, Fiona E. (eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences, 462506. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tabain, Marija, Breen, Gavan & Butcher, Andrew. 2004. VC vs. CV syllables: A comparison of Aboriginal languages with English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34, 175200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topintzi., Nina. 2010. Onsets: Prosodic and suprasegmental behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Richard. 2004. Perceptual cue robustness and phonotactic constraints. In Hayes, Bruce, Kirchner, Robert & Steriade, Donca (eds.), Phonetically based phonology, 3457. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Richard, Frisch, Stephen & Pisoni, David. 1997. Speech perception: Research on spoken language processing (Progress Report 21). Ms., Indiana University.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira. 2003. Casting doubt on the onset–rime distinction. Lingua 113, 779816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

A representational parameter for onsetless syllables1
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

A representational parameter for onsetless syllables1
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

A representational parameter for onsetless syllables1
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *