Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese 1

  • MARK DINGEMANSE (a1) and KIMI AKITA (a2)
Abstract

Words and phrases may differ in the extent to which they are susceptible to prosodic foregrounding and expressive morphology: their expressiveness. They may also differ in the degree to which they are integrated in the morphosyntactic structure of the utterance: their grammatical integration. We describe an inverse relation that holds across widely varied languages, such that more expressiveness goes together with less grammatical integration, and vice versa. We review typological evidence for this inverse relation in ten spoken languages, then quantify and explain it using Japanese corpus data. We do this by tracking ideophones – vivid sensory words also known as mimetics or expressives – across different morphosyntactic contexts and measuring their expressiveness in terms of intonation, phonation and expressive morphology. We find that as expressiveness increases, grammatical integration decreases. Using gesture as a measure independent of the speech signal, we find that the most expressive ideophones are most likely to come together with iconic gestures. We argue that the ultimate cause is the encounter of two distinct and partly incommensurable modes of representation: the gradient, iconic, depictive system represented by ideophones and iconic gestures, and the discrete, arbitrary, descriptive system represented by ordinary words. The study shows how people combine modes of representation in speech and demonstrates the value of integrating description and depiction into the scientific vision of language.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese 1
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese 1
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese 1
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Author’s address: Language & Cognition Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, P.O. Box 310, 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlands mark.dingemanse@mpi.nl
Author’s address: School of Languages and Cultures, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya-shi, Aichi 464-8601, Japan akita@lang.nagoya-u.ac.jp
Footnotes
Hide All
[1]

We thank NHK for allowing us to use the data from the Earthquake Archives, and Kyosuke Yamamoto for helping with the reliability check. Thanks to Nick Enfield, Gwilym Lockwood, Tayo Takada, Noburo Saji, Francisco Torreira, and three anonymous Journal of Linguistics referees for providing helpful comments. This research was supported by the Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science and an NWO Veni grant (MD) and by Grants-in-Aid for Young Scientists (24720179, 15K16741) and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (25370425) (KA).

Interlinear glosses follow the Leipzig Glossing Rules. An anonymised version of the data with all R code underlying the analyses is available through the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/x2y65/.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Kimi Akita  & Takeshi Usuki . 2016. A constructional account of the ‘optional’ quotative marking on Japanese mimetics. Journal of Linguistics 52.2, 245275.

Junko Baba . 2003. Pragmatic function of Japanese mimetics in the spoken discourse of varying emotive intensity levels. Journal of Pragmatics 35, 18611889.

Douglas Bates , Martin Mächler , Ben Bolker  & Steve Walker . 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67.1, 148.

Joan L. Bybee 2007. Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Herbert H. Clark  & Richard J. Gerrig . 1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66.4, 764805.

Kathryn Davidson . 2015. Quotation, demonstration, and iconicity. Linguistics and Philosophy 38.6, 477520.

Mark De Vries . 2008. The representation of language within language: A syntactico-pragmatic typology of direct speech. Studia Linguistica 62.1, 3977.

Cabdulqaadir Salaad Dhoorre  & Mauro Tosco . 1998. 111 Somali ideophones. Journal of African Cultural Studies 11.2, 125156.

Mark Dingemanse . 2012. Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6.10, 654672.

Mark Dingemanse . 2013. Ideophones and gesture in everyday speech. Gesture 13.2, 143165.

Mark Dingemanse , Will Schuerman , Eva Reinisch , Sylvia Tufvesson  & Holger Mitterer . 2016. What sound symbolism can and cannot do: Testing the iconicity of ideophones from five languages. Language 92.2, e117e133.

N. J. Enfield 2009. The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Alvan R. Feinstein  & Domenic V. Cicchetti . 1990. High agreement but low Kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 43.6, 543549.

Erik Fudge . 1970. Phonological structure and ‘expressiveness’. Journal of Linguistics 6.2, 161188.

Tom Güldemann . 2008. Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 34). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Charles F. Hockett 1960. The origin of speech. Scientific American 203.3, 8996.

Adam Kendon . 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sotaro Kita . 1997. Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35, 379415.

Marian Klamer . 2002. Semantically motivated lexical patterns: A study of Dutch and Kambera expressives. Language 78.2, 258286.

Paul Kockelman . 2010. Language, culture, and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nicole Kruspe . 2004. A grammar of Semelai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Willem J. M. Levelt 1981. The speaker’s linearization problem. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, Biological Sciences 295.1077, 305315.

Elena Mihas . 2012. Ideophones in Alto Perene (Arawak) from Eastern Peru. Studies in Language 36.2, 300344.

Frederick J. Newmeyer 1992. Iconicity and generative grammar. Language 68.4, 756796.

Lynne C. Nygaard , Debora S. Herold  & Laura L. Namy . 2009. The semantics of prosody: Acoustic and perceptual evidence of prosodic correlates to word meaning. Cognitive Science 33.1, 127146.

Aslı Özyürek . 2014. Hearing and seeing meaning in speech and gesture: Insights from brain and behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 369.1651, 20130296.

Christopher Potts . 2007. The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33.2, 165198.

William J. Samarin 1970. Inventory and choice in expressive language. Word 26, 153169.

Jack Sidnell . 2006. Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language & Social Interaction 39.4, 377409.

Kiyoko Toratani . 2015. Iconicity in the syntax and lexical semantics of sound-symbolic words in Japanese. In Masako K. Hiraga , William J. Herlofsky , Kazuko Shinohara  & Kimi Akita (eds.), Iconicity in language and literature, vol. 14, 125141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Natsuko Tsujimura . 2005. A constructional approach to mimetic verbs. In Mirjam Fried  & Hans C. Boas (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Back to the roots, 137154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

F. K. Erhard Voeltz  & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.). 2001. Ideophones (Typological Studies in Language 44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Arnold M. Zwicky  & Geoffrey K. Pullum . 1987. Plain morphology and expressive morphology. In John Aske , Natasha Beery , Laura Michaelis  & Hana Filip (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS 30), 330340. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 82
Total number of PDF views: 350 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 972 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 4th October 2016 - 22nd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.