Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:12:57.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Andreas Trotzke, Rethinking syntactocentrism: Architectural issues and case studies at the syntax–pragmatics interface (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 225). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2015. Pp. vi + 147.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2016

Kriszta Szendrői
Kriszta Szendrői*
Affiliation:
University College London
*
Author’s address: Linguistics, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, Chandler House, 2 Wakefield St, London WC1N 1PF, UKk.szendroi@ucl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , 01 February 2017 , pp. 223 - 228
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, Roderick A. & Rosenbaum, Peter S. (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2006. On pure syntax (uncontaminated by information structure). In Brandt, Patrick & Fuss, Eric (eds.), Form, structure and grammar, 137–157. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert & Lenertová, Denisa. 2011. Left peripheral focus: Mismatches between syntax and information structure. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29, 169–209.Google Scholar
Fox, Danny & Pesetsky, David. 2005. Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31, 1–45.Google Scholar
Frey, Werner. 1994. The grammar–pragmatics interface and the German prefield. Sprache und Pragmatik 52, 1–39.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert & Pietroski, Paul M.. 2009. Basic operations: Minimal syntax-semantics. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 8, 113–139.Google Scholar
Horvath, Julia. 2010. ‘Discourse features’, syntactic displacement and the status of contrast. Lingua 120, 1346–1369.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2003. Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Fodor, Jerry A.. 1963. The structure of a semantic theory. Language 39, 170–210.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Szendrői, Kriszta. 2004. Superman sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 149–159.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szendrői, Kriszta. 2001. Focus and the syntax–phonology interface. Ph.D. dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Wagner, Michael. 2005. Prosody and recursion. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar