Skip to main content
×
Home

Clausal parentheticals, intonational phrasing, and prosodic theory1

  • NICOLE DEHÉ (a1)
Abstract

This paper investigates the intonational phrasing of three types of parenthetical insertions – non-restrictive relative clauses (NRRCs), full sentences, and comment clauses (CCs) – in actual spoken language. It draws on a large set of data from a corpus of spoken British English. Its aim is twofold: first, it evaluates the correctness of previous claims about the intonational phrasing of parentheticals, specifically the assumption that parentheticals are phrased in a separate intonation domain; second, it discusses the implications of the intonational phrasing of parentheticals for prosodic theory. The results of the data analysis are as follows. First, the longer types of interpolations but not CCs are by default phrased separately. Second, both the temporal and the tonal structure of the host may be affected by the parenthetical. Third, CCs lend themselves more readily to the restructuring of intonational phrases such that they are phrased in one domain together with material from the host. Fourth, the prosodic results cannot be explained in syntactic accounts which do not allow for a syntactic relation between parenthetical and host. Fifth, the interface constraints on intonational phrasing apply to parentheticals. Sixth, the intonational phrasing of parentheticals supports the assumption of a post-syntactic, phonological component of the grammar at which restructuring applies.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Author's address: Institut für Englische Philologie, FU Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin, Germanyndehe@zedat.fu-berlin.de
Footnotes
Hide All
[1]

I have benefitted from discussion of the work presented here with many people. Thanks are due to the audiences at the Workshop on Parenthesis and Sentence Amalgamation held at the University of Groningen in October 2007, and at the 2nd Prosody–Syntax Workshop (PSI 2) held at ZAS, Berlin, in June 2008; to Anne Wichmann for discussion and numerous native-speaker judgments; to my colleagues in the Berlin/Potsdam area: Laura Downing, Ingo Feldhausen, Sam Hellmuth, Shin Ishihara, Hubert Truckenbrodt and Cedric Patin; to colleagues elsewhere: Jelena Krivokapić, Aditi Lahiri, Frans Plank and Mark de Vries; and to the students attending the course Syntax III – Parentheticals in English, held at the University of Konstanz, summer 2008. I am particularly grateful to Lisa Selkirk and to one other, anonymous reviewer for the Journal of Linguistics for their extensive and insightful comments, as well as to the proofreader for JL. The work presented here has benefitted greatly from the International Corpus of English and accompanying software. ICE-GB is coordinated by the Survey of English Usage, University College London. For more information, consult the following website: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/english-usage/projects/ice-gb/.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Ackema Peter & Neeleman Ad. 2004. Beyond morphology: Interface conditions on word formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aijmer Karin. 1997. I think – an English modal particle. In Swan Toril & Westvik Olaf Jansen (eds.), Modality in Germanic languages: Historical and comparative perspective, 147. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Altmann Hans. 1981. Formen der “Herausstellung” im Deutschen: Rechtsversetzung, Linksversetzung, Freies Thema und verwandte Konstruktionen (Linguistische Arbeiten 106). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Armstrong Lilias E. & Ward Ida C.. 1926. A handbook of English intonation. Cambridge: Heffer & Sons.
Arnold Doug. 2007. Non-restrictive relatives are not orphans. Journal of Linguistics 43.2, 271309.
Astruc Lluisa. 2005. The intonation of extra-sentential elements in Catalan and English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Barth-Weingarten Dagmar. 2007. Prosody, Construction Grammar and language change. In Volk-Birke Sabine & Lippert Julia (eds.), Anglistentag 2006, Halle, 423433. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
Beckman Mary E., Hirschberg Julia & Shattuck-Hufnagel Stefanie. 2005. The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In Jun (ed.), 954.
Beckman Mary E. & Pierrehumbert Janet B.. 1986. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3, 255309.
Bing Janet M. 1985. Aspects of English prosody. New York & London: Garland.
Blakemore Diane. 2005. And-parentheticals. Journal of Pragmatics 37, 11651181.
Boersma Paul. 2001. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5, 341347.
Boersma Paul & Weenink David. 2008. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. http://www.praat.org/ (7 January 2008).
Bolinger Dwight. 1989. Intonation and its uses: Melody in grammar and discourse. London: Arnold.
Burton-Roberts Noel. 1999. Language, linear precedence and parentheticals. In Collins Peter & Lee David (eds.), The clause in English, 3352. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Burton-Roberts Noel. 2006. Parentheticals. In Brown Keith (ed.), Encyclopaedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edn., vol. 9, 179182. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Chomsky Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 152. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky Noam. 2004. On phases. Ms., MIT.
Chomsky Noam. 2005. The factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36.1, 122.
Cooper William E. & Paccia-Cooper Jeanne. 1980. Syntax and speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cooper William & Sorensen John. 1981. Fundamental frequency in sentence production. Heidelberg: Springer.
Corver Norbert & Thiersch Craig. 2002. Remarks on parentheticals. In Oostendorp Marc van & Anagnostopoulou Elena (eds.), Progress in grammar: Articles at the 20th Anniversary of the Comparison of Grammatical Models Group in Tilburg. http://www.meertens.knaw.nl/books/progressingrammar/ (7 January 2008).
Cruttenden Alan. 1997. Intonation, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crystal David. 1969. Prosodic systems and intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crystal David. 1972. The intonation system of English. In Bolinger Dwight (ed.), Intonation: Selected readings, 110136. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
D'Avis Franz Josef. 2005. Über Parenthesen. In D'Avis (ed.), 259279.
D'Avis Franz Josef(ed.) 2005a. Deutsche Syntax: Empirie und Theorie. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Dehé Nicole. 2007. The relation between syntactic and prosodic parenthesis. In Dehé & Kavalova (eds.), 261284.
Dehé Nicole. 2008. To delete or not to delete: The contexts of Icelandic final vowel deletion. Lingua 118.5, 732753.
Dehé Nicole & Kavalova Yordanka. 2006. The syntax, pragmatics and prosody of parenthetical what. English Language & Linguistics 10.2, 289320.
Dehé Nicole & Kavalova Yordanka. 2007. Parentheticals: An introduction. In Dehé & Kavalova (eds.), 122.
Dehé Nicole & Kavalova Yordanka (eds.). 2007a. Parentheticals (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Dehé Nicole & Wichmann Anne. To appear. The multifunctionality of epistemic parentheticals in discourse: Prosodic cues to the semantic–pragmatic boundary. Functions of Language.
D'Imperio Mariapaola, Elordieta Gorka, Frota Sónia, Prieto Pilar & Vigário Marina. 2005. Intonational phrasing in Romance: The role of syntactic and prosodic structure. In Frota et al. (eds.), 5997.
Downing Bruce T. 1970. Syntactic structure and phonological phrasing in English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
Elordieta Gorka, Frota Sónia & Vigário Marina. 2005. Subjects, objects and intonational phrasing in Spanish and Portuguese. Studia Linguistica 59.2/3, 110143.
Emonds Joseph E. 1973. Parenthetical clauses. In Corum Claudia, Smith-Stark Cedrik & Weiser Ann (eds.), You take the high node and I'll take the low node, 333347. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Emonds Joseph E. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax: Root, structure-preserving, and local transformations. New York, San Francisco & London: Academic Press.
Emonds Joseph E. 1979. Appositive relatives have no properties. Linguistic Inquiry 10.2, 211243.
Espinal M. Teresa. 1991. The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67.4, 726762.
Fabb Nigel. 1990. The difference between English restrictive and nonrestrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics 26.1, 5777.
Fagyal Zsuzsanna. 2002. Prosodic boundaries in the vicinity of utterance-medial parentheticals in French. Probus 14.1, 93111.
Ferreira Fernanda. 1991. Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances. Journal of Memory and Language 30, 210233.
Ferreira Fernanda. 1993. Creation of prosody during sentence production. Psychological Review 100.2, 233253.
Frazier Lyn, Clifton Charles Jr. & Carlson Katy. 2004. Don't break, or do: Prosodic boundary preferences. Lingua 114, 327.
Frota Sónia. 2000. Prosody and focus in European Portuguese: Phonological phrasing and intonation. New York & London: Garland.
Frota Sónia, Vigário Marina & Freitas Maria J. (eds.). 2005. Prosodies: With special reference to Iberian languages. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gee James P. & Grosjean François. 1983. Performance structures: A psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal. Cognitive Psychology 15, 411458.
Ghini Mirco. 1993. Phi-formation in Italian: A new proposal. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 12, 4178.
Grewendorf Günther. 1988. Aspekte der deutschen Syntax: Eine Rektions–Bindungs–Analyse. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Gussenhoven Carlos. 1990. Tonal association domains and the prosodic hierarchy in English. In Ramsaran Susan M. (ed.), Studies in the pronunciation of English. A commemorative volume in honour of A. C. Gimson, 2737. London: Routledge.
Gussenhoven Carlos. 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gussenhoven Carlos & Rietveld A. C. M.. 1992. Intonation contours, prosodic structure and preboundary lengthening. Journal of Phonetics 20, 283303.
Haegeman Liliane. 1991. Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. In Chiba Shuki, Ogawa Akira, Fuiwara Yasuaki, Yamada Norio, Koma Osamu & Yagi Takao (eds.), Aspects of modern linguistics: Papers presented to Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th birthday, 232254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.
Haider Hubert. 1993. ECP-Etüden: Anmerkungen zur Extraktion aus eingebetteten Verb-Zweit-Sätzen. Linguistische Berichte 145, 185203.
Haider Hubert. 2005. Parenthesen – Evidenz aus Bindungsverhältnissen. In D'Avis (ed.), 281293.
Hellmuth Sam. 2008. Prosodic weight and phonological phrasing in Cairene Arabic. Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 40, 97111.
Hirschberg Julia. 2004. Pragmatics and intonation. In Horn Laurence R. & Ward Gregory (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 515537. Oxford: Blackwell.
Jackendoff Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jespersen Otto. 1937. Analytic syntax. London: Allen & Unwin.
Jun Sun-Ah. 2003. The effect of phrase length and speech rate on prosodic phrasing. 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 15) (Barcelona, Spain, 2–9 August 2003), 483486.
Jun Sun-Ah. 2005. Prosodic typology. In Jun (ed.), 430458.
Jun Sun-Ah (ed.). 2005a. Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kaltenböck Gunther. 2007. Spoken parenthetical clauses in English: A taxonomy. In Dehé & Kavalova (eds.), 2552.
Kavalova Yordanka. 2007. And-parenthetical clauses. In Dehé & Kavalova (eds.), 145172.
Kiziak Tanja. 2007. Long extraction or parenthetical insertion? Evidence from judgement studies. In Dehé & Kavalova (eds.), 121144.
Knowles Gerry. 1991. Prosodic labelling: The problem of tone group boundaries. In Johansson Stig & Stenström Anna-Brita (eds.), English computer corpora: Selected papers and research guide (Topics in English Linguistics 3), 149161. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kratzer Angelika & Selkirk Elisabeth. 2007. Phase theory and prosodic spellout: The case of verbs. The Linguistic Review 24, 93135.
Krivokapić Jelena. 2007. Prosodic planning: Effects of phrasal length and complexity on pause duration. Journal of Phonetics 35, 162179.
Ladd D. Robert. 1986. Intonational phrasing: The case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology Yearbook 3, 311340.
Ladd D. Robert. 1996. Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Local John. 1992. Continuing and restarting. In Auer Peter & Luzio Aldo di (eds.), The contextualization of language, 273296. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
McCawley James D. 1982. Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13.1, 91106.
Murphy M. Lynne. 1993. Discourse markers and sentential syntax. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 23.1, 163167.
Nelson Gerald, Wallis Sean & Aarts Bas. 2002. Exploring natural language: Working with the British component of the International Corpus of English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Nespor Marina & Vogel Irene. 1986. Prosodic phonology (Studies in Generative Grammar 28). Dordrecht: Foris.
Nolan Francis. 2006. Intonation. In Aarts Bas & McMahon April (eds.), The handbook of English linguistics, 433457. Oxford: Blackwell.
Payà Marta. 2003. Prosody and pragmatics in parenthetical insertions in Catalan. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 2, 207227.
Peters Jörg. 2006. Syntactic and prosodic parenthesis. 3rd International Conference on Speech Prosody (2–5 May 2006, Dresden), PS4-21-245.
Peterson Peter. 1999. On the boundaries of syntax. In Collins Peter & Lee David (eds.), The clause in English, 229250. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Peterson Peter. 2004. Non-restrictive relatives and other non-syntagmatic relations in an LF framework. Presented at LFG 2004, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Pierrehumbert Janet. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Pierrehumbert Janet & Hirschberg Julia. 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Cohen Philip R., Morgan Jerry & Pollack Martha E. (eds.), Intentions in communication, 271311. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Potts Christopher. 2002. The syntax and semantics of as-parentheticals. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20.3, 623689.
Potts Christopher. 2005. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prieto Pilar. 2005. Syntactic and eurhythmic constraints on phrasing decisions in Catalan. Studia Linguistica 59.2/3, 194222.
Quirk Randolph, Greenbaum Sidney, Leech Geoffrey & Svartvik Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Harlow: Longman.
Reis Marga. 1995. Wer glaubst du hat recht? On so-called extractions from verb-second clauses and verb-first parenthetical constructions in German. Sprache und Pragmatik 36, 2783.
Reis Marga. 2002. Wh-movement and integrated parenthetical constructions. In Zwart C. Jan-Wouter & Abraham Werner (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax: 15th Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 53), 340. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ross John R. 1973. Slifting. In Gross Maurice, Halle Morris & Schützenberger Marcel-Paul (eds.), The Formal Analysis of Natural Languages: 1st International Conference, 133169. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.
Safir Kenneth. 1986. Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels. Linguistic Inquiry 17.4, 663689.
Sandalo Filomena & Truckenbrodt Hubert. 2002. Some notes on phonological phrasing in Brazilian Portuguese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 42, 285310.
Schafer Amy J., Speer Shari R., Warren Paul & White David S.. 2000. Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29.2, 169182.
Schelfhout Carla, Coppen Peter-Arno & Oostdijk Nelleke. 2004. Finite comment clauses in Dutch: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14.4, 331350.
Schneider Stefan. 2007a. Reduced parenthetical clauses as mitigators: A corpus study of spoken French, Italian and Spanish (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 27). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Schneider Stefan. 2007b. Reduced parenthetical clauses in Romance languages: A pragmatic typology. In Dehé & Kavalova (eds.), 237258.
Schubiger Maria. 1958. English intonation: Its form and function. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Selkirk Elisabeth. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Selkirk Elisabeth. 1995a. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. In Goldsmith John A. (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 550569. Oxford: Blackwell.
Selkirk Elisabeth. 1995b. The prosodic structure of function words. In Morgan James E. & Demuth Katherine (eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition, 187213. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Selkirk Elisabeth. 2000. The interaction of constraints on prosodic phrasing. In Horne Merle (ed.), Prosody: Theory and experiment, 231261. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Selkirk Elisabeth. 2005. Comments on intonational phrasing in English. In Frota et al. (eds.), 1158.
Shattuck-Hufnagel Stefanie & Turk Alice E.. 1996. A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25, 193247.
Taglicht Josef. 1998. Constraints on intonational phrasing in English. Journal of Linguistics 34.1, 181211.
Tappe Thilo. 1981. Wer glaubst du hat recht? Einige Bemerkungen zur COMP–COMP-Bewegung im Deutschen. In Kohrt M. & Lenerz Jürgen (eds.), Sprache: Formen und Strukturen. Akten des 15. Linguistischen Kolloquiums, Münster 1980, Band 1 (Linguistische Arbeiten 98), 203212. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Thompson Sandra A. & Mulac Anthony. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Traugott Elizabeth C. & Heine Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 2: Focus on types of grammatical markers (Typological Studies in Language 19.2), 313329. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Truckenbrodt Hubert. 2005. A short report on intonation phrase boundaries in German. Linguistische Berichte 203, 273296.
Urmson J. O. 1952. Parenthetical verbs. Mind 61, 480496.
Vaissière Jacqueline. 1983. Language-independent prosodic features. In Cutler Anne & Ladd D. Robert (eds.), Prosody: Models and measurements, 5366. Berlin: Springer.
Vries Mark de. 2005. Coordination and syntactic hierarchy. Studia Linguistica 59.1, 83–105.
Vries Mark de. 2007. Invisible constituents? Parentheses as B-merged adverbial phrases. In Dehé & Kavalova (eds.), 203234.
Wagner Michael. 2004. Asymmetries in the syntax and prosody of verb-initial interpolated clauses. In Blaho Sylvia, Vicente Luis & Vos Mark de (eds.), Console XII, 201215. Leiden: Leiden University.
Warren Paul, Schafer Amy J., Speer Shari R. & White David S.. 2000. Prosodic resolution of prepositional phrase ambiguity in ambiguous and unambiguous situations. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 99, 533.
Watson Duane & Gibson Edward. 2004. The relationship between intonational phrasing and syntactic structure in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes 19.6, 713755.
Wells John C. 2006. English intonation: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wichmann Anne. 2000. Intonation in text and discourse: Beginnings, middles and ends. Harlow: Longman.
Wichmann Anne. 2001. Spoken parentheticals. In Aijmer Karin (ed.), A wealth of English: Studies in honour of Göran Kjellmer, 177193. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 52 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 157 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.