Skip to main content

Coding causal–noncausal verb alternations: A form–frequency correspondence explanation1


We propose, and provide corpus-based support for, a usage-based explanation for cross-linguistic trends in the coding of causal–noncausal verb pairs, such as raise/rise, break (tr.)/break (intr.). While English mostly uses the same verb form both for the causal and the noncausal sense (labile coding), most languages have extra coding for the causal verb (causative coding) and/or for the noncausal verb (anticausative coding). Causative and anticausative coding is not randomly distributed (Haspelmath 1993): Some verb meanings, such as ‘freeze’, ‘dry’ and ‘melt’, tend to be coded as causatives, while others, such as ‘break’, ‘open’ and ‘split’, tend to be coded as anticausatives. We propose an explanation of these coding tendencies on the basis of the form–frequency correspondence principle, which is a general efficiency principle that is responsible for many grammatical asymmetries, ultimately grounded in predictability of frequently expressed meanings. In corpus data from seven languages, we find that verb pairs for which the noncausal member is more frequent tend to be coded as anticausatives, while verb pairs for which the causal member is more frequent tend to be coded as causatives. Our approach implies that linguists should not rely on form–meaning parallelism when trying to explain cross-linguistic or language-particular patterns in this domain.

Corresponding author
Authors’ address: (Haspelmath)Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig,
Hide All

We are grateful to three anonymous referees for the Journal of Linguistics as well as to Bernard Comrie for very useful comments on this paper. In addition, we are grateful to the audiences in several places where we presented this work: at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (which also deserves thanks for bringing several of the authors together), at the 4th UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference (London), at the Societas Linguistica Europaea 2012 in Stockholm, and at the Syntax of the World's Languages 5 in Dubrovnik.

Hide All
Alexiadou Artemis. 2010. On the morpho-syntax of (anti-)causative verbs. In Hovav Malka Rappaport, Doron Edit & Sichel Ivy (eds.), Syntax, lexical semantics and event structure, 177203. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alexiadou Artemis, Anagnostopoulou Elena & Schäfer Florian. 2006. The properties of anti-causatives crosslinguistically. In Frascarelli Mara (ed.), Phases of interpretation, 187211. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Borer Hagit. 1991. The causative–inchoative alternation: A case study in parallel morphology. The Linguistic Review 8, 119158.
Bybee Joan L. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language 82.4, 711733.
Clark Eve V. & Clark Herbert H.. 1978. Universals, relativity, and language processing. In Greenberg Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of human language, vol. 1: Method and theory, 225277. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Comrie Bernard. 1985. Causative verb formation and other verb-derivational morphology. In Shopen Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3: Grammatical categories and lexicon, 309348. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft William. 1990. Possible verbs and the structure of events. In Tsohatzidis Savas L. (ed.), Meaning and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization, 4873. London: Routledge.
Croft William. 2003. Typology and universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cysouw Michael. 2008. Generalizing scales. In Richards Marc & Malchukov Andrej L. (eds.), Scales (Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 86), 379396. Leipzig: Institut für Linguistik, University of Leipzig.
Dixon R. M. W. & Aikhenvald Alexandra Y.. 2000. Introduction. In Dixon R. M. W. & Aikhenvald Alexandra Y. (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 129. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doron Edit. 2003. Agency and voice: The semantics of Semitic templates. Natural Language Semantics 11, 167.
Givón Talmy. 1991. Markedness in grammar: Distributional, communicative and cognitive correlates of syntactic structure. Studies in Language 15.2, 335370.
Greenberg Joseph H. 1966. Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.
Guerssel Mohamed, Hale Kenneth, Laughren Mary, Levin Beth & Eagle Josie White. 1985. A cross-linguistic study of transitivity alternations. Chicago Linguistic Society 21, part 2, 4862.
Haiman John. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59.4, 781819.
Hakkani-Tür Dilek Zeynep. 2000. Statistical language modeling for agglutinative languages. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Computer Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara.
Haspelmath Martin. 1987. Transitivity alternations of the anticausative type (Arbeitspapiere Des Instituts Für Sprachwissenschaft N.F. Nr. 4). Cologne: Universität zu Köln.
Haspelmath Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Comrie Bernard & Polinsky Maria (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, 87120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haspelmath Martin. 2004. Does linguistic explanation presuppose linguistic description? Studies in Language 28, 554579.
Haspelmath Martin. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42.1, 2570.
Haspelmath Martin. 2008a. Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 19.1, 133.
Haspelmath Martin. 2008b. Creating economical morphosyntactic patterns in language change. In Good Jeff (ed.), Language universals and language change, 185214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haspelmath Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86.3, 663687.
Haspelmath Martin. 2011. The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45.2, 3180.
Hawkins John A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heidinger Steffen. 2010. French anticausatives: A diachronic perspective. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Heidinger Steffen. 2012. Frequenz und die Kodierung der Kausativ–Antikausativ-Alternation im Französischen. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 62, 3158.
Heidinger Steffen. To appear. Causalness and the encoding of the causative–anticausative alternation in French and Spanish. Journal of Linguistics.
Koontz-Garboden Andrew. 2009. Anticausativization. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27, 77138.
Lehmann Christian. 2007. On the upgrading of grammatical concepts. In Moerdijk Fons, van Santen Ariane & Tempelaars Rob (eds.), Leven met woorden: Opstellen aangeboden aan Piet van Sterkenburg, 409422. Leiden: Brill.
Letuchiy Alexander. 2010. Lability and spontaneity. In Brandt Patrick & García Marco García (eds.), Transitivity: Form, meaning, acquisition, and processing, 237256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Levin Beth & Hovav Malka Rappaport. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax–lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marantz Alec. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mel’čuk Igor’ A. 1967. K ponjatiju slovoobrazovanija. Izvestija Akademii Nauk SSSR, Serija literatury i jazyka 26(4), 352362.
Mihalcea Rada F. & Năstase Vivi A.. 2002. Letter level learning for language independent diacritics restoration. In Roth Dan & van den Bosch Antal (eds.), 6th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2002), 105111. Taipei. []
Narrog Heiko. 2007. Nihongo zita dōshi ni okeru yūhyōsei-sa no dōki-duke [On the motivation for markedness differences in Japanese transitivity verb pairs]. In Tsunoda Mie, Sasaki Kan & Shioya Tōru (eds.), Tadōsei no tsūgengoteki kenkyū – Tsunoda Tasaku Hakase kanreki kinen ronbunshū [Cross-linguistic studies of transitivity – a Festschrift for the 60th birthday of Doctor Tsunoda Tasaku], 295306. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.
Narrog Heiko, Pardeshi Prashant & Sanada Haruko. 2014. Motivating coding differences in transitivity pairs with frequency: A case study from Japanese. Ms., Tohoku University & NINJAL Tokyo.
Nedjalkov Vladimir P. & Sil'nickij Georgij G.. 1969. Tipologija morfologičeskogo i leksičeskogo kauzativov [Typology of morphological and lexical causatives]. In Xolodovič Alexander A. (ed.), Tipologija kauzativnyx konstrukcij [Typology of causative constructions], 2060. Leningrad: Nauka.
Nedyalkov [Nedjalkov] Vladimir P. & Silnitsky Georgy G.. 1973. The typology of morphological and lexical causatives. In Kiefer Ferenc (ed.), Trends in Soviet theoretical linguistics, 132. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Nichols Johanna, Peterson David A. & Barnes Jonathan. 2004. Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8.2, 149211.
Payne Thomas. 1997. Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Piñón Christopher. 2001. A finer look at the causative–inchoative alternation. In Hastings Rachel, Jackson Brendan & Zvolenszky Zsofia (eds.), Semantics and linguistic theory, vol. 11, 346364. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Pylkkänen Liina. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
R Development Core Team. 2004. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
Rosch Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Rosch Eleanor & Lloyd Barbara (eds.), Cognition and categorization, 189206. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Samardžić Tanja & Merlo Paola. 2012. The meaning of lexical causatives in cross-linguistic variation. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology 7.12, 114.
Schäfer Florian. 2008. The syntax of (anti-)causatives: External arguments in change-of-state contexts. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Schäfer Florian. 2009. The causative alternation. Language and Linguistics Compass 3.2, 641681.
Siewierska Anna. 1984. The passive: A comparative linguistic analysis. London: Croom Helm.
Spagnol Michael. 2011. A tale of two morphologies: Verb structure and argument alternations in Maltese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Konstanz.
Wright Saundra K. 2001. Internally caused and externally caused change of state verbs. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University.
Zipf George K. 1935. The psycho-biology of language. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 14
Total number of PDF views: 191 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 311 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.