Skip to main content Accessibility help

Contrasting extraction types1

  • Paul M. Postal (a1)


This paper grounds a novel typology yielding three major types of English (L(eft)-extraction, defined by their relation to resumptive pronouns (RPs): (1) B-extractions, which require RPs in their extraction sites, (2) A1-extractions, which allow RPs in their extraction sites, and (3) A2-extractions, which forbid RPs in their extraction sites. Type B is represented by topicalization; type A1 by most instances of question extraction. The A/B distinction is supported by correlations with restrictions on definite pronouns. A2-extractions, e.g. free relative extraction, are insensitive to such and unlike A1/B-extractions are incompatible with what I call selective islands, which is explained.



Hide All
Brame, M. K. (1978). Base generated syntax. Seattle: Noit Amrofer.
Bresnan, J. W. (1975). Comparative deletion and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Analysis I. 2574.
Chomsky, N. (1977). On wh-movement. In Culicover, P., Wasow, T. & Akmajian, A. (eds.) Formal syntax. New York: Academic Press. 71132.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cinque, G. (1990). Types of Ā-dependencies, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Emonds, J. (1979). Appositive relatives have no properties. Linguistic Inquiry 10. 211243.
Emonds, J. (1985). A unified theory of syntactic categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
Frampton, J. (1991). Relativized minimality: a review. The Linguistic Review 8. 146.
Gazdar, G. (1982). Phrase structure grammar. In Jacobson, P. & Pullum, G. K. (eds.) The nature of syntactic representation. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. 131186.
Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G. K. & Sag, I. (1985). Generalized phrase structure grammar. Oxford: Basic Blackwell.
Heim, I. (1988). Where does the definiteness restriction apply? Evidence from the definiteness of variables. In Reuland, E. J. & ter Meulen, A. G. B. (eds.) The representation of (in) definiteness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Huang, C.-T. J. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Hukari, T. E. & Levine, R. D. (1991). On the disunity of unbounded dependency constructions. Natural Language and Linquistic Theory 9. 97144.
Kaplan, R. & Bresnan, J. W. (1982). Lexical-functional grammar: a formal system for grammatical representation. In Bresnan, J. W. (ed.) The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 173281.
Kaplan, R. M. & Zaenen, A. (1989). Long-distance dependencies, constituent structure, and functional uncertainty. In Baltin, M. & Kroch, A. S. (eds.) Alternative conceptions of phrase structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kayne, R. S. (1984). Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.
Koster, J. (1978). Locality principles in syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
Koster, J. (1987). Domains and dynasties. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kroch, A. S. (1989). Asymmetries in long-distance extraction in a tree-adjoining grammar. In Baltin, M. & Kroch, A. S. (eds.) Alternative conceptions of phrase structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Langendoen, D. T. & Pullum, G. K. (1977). Preposition stranding in English: a problem and a mystery. In Fox, S. E., Woodford, A. B. & Philosoph, S. (eds.) CLS book of squibs. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Lasnik, H. & Saito, M. (1992). Move α. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Manzini, R. (1992). Locality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McCloskey, J. (1979). Transformational syntax and model theoretic semantics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Obenauer, H.-G. (1984). On the identification of empty categories. The Linguistic Review 4. 153202.
Obenauer, H.-G. (1985). Connectedness, variables, and stylistic inversion in French. In Guéron, J., Obenauer, H.-G. & Pollock, J.-Y. (eds.) Grammatical representation. Dordrecht: Foris.
Obenauer, H.-G. (1986). Déplacer α et Ā-liage local: dérivations vs. representations. In Ronat, M. & Couquaux, D. (eds.) La grammaire modulaire. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.
Obenauer, H.-G. (1992). L'interprétation des structures wh et l'accord du participe passé. In Obenauer, H.-G. & Zribi-Hertz, A. (eds.) Structure de la phrase et théorie du liage. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.
Perlmutter, D. M. (1972). Evidence for shadow pronouns in French relativization. In Peranteau, P. M., Levi, J. N. & Phares, G. C. (eds.) The Chicago which hunt. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Pollard, C. & Sag, I. A. (1987). Information-based syntax and semantics, 1: Fundamentals. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Pollard, C. & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Pullum, G. K. (1987). Implications of English extraposed irrealis clauses. In Miller, A. & Powers, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT. Published as Infinite syntax. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing. (1986).
Sells, P. (1984). Syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Steedman, M. (1985). Dependency and coordination in the grammar of Dutch and English. Language 61. 523568.
Steedman, M. (1988). Combinators and grammars. In Oehrle, R. T., Bach, E. & Wheeler, D. (eds.) Categorial grammars and natural language structures. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Steedman, M. (1989). Constituency and coordination in a combinatory grammar. In Baltin, M. & Kroch, A. S. (eds.) Alternative conceptions of phrase structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Vergnaud, J.-R. (1974). French relative clauses. PhD dissertation, MIT.


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed