Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Discourse properties of now 1

  • EUNHEE LEE (a1)
Abstract

This paper proposes an updated analysis of the uses of now to modify past-tense clauses in narratives. It is by now well known that indexical expressions such as now are not as rigid as previously thought and can shift in some contexts (e.g. a literary style like Free Indirect Discourse in English or under report verbs in some languages). What is interesting about shifted now is that its distribution is much broader than these limited contexts. The conditions under which it can shift, however, are unclear and still under debate. Many recent proposals have tried to derive this property from the lexical meaning of now, thus treating it as a special case. Unlike previous analyses, I argue that the temporal perspective shift and temporal relations are functions of narrative discourse itself rather than the lexical semantics of now. The lexical meaning of now, I contend, is that it refers to a contextually salient time, regardless of whether it derives from actual speech context or discourse context. In addition, now invariably indicates a change of state, denoting the turning point dividing the past and the future seen from this contextually salient time. My claim is based on a quantitative study of naturally occurring narrative examples from the British National Corpus, and formalized in the discourse-level formal framework of Discourse Representation Theory.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Author’s address: Baldy Hall 605, Department of Linguistics, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA ehlee@buffalo.edu
Footnotes
Hide All
[1]

I thank the editor and the three anonymous referees of the Journal of Linguistics for their valuable comments on earlier versions of the paper. I also thank Mark Nathan for editing the paper.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Abbott, H. Porter. 2008. The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Altshuler, Daniel. 2010. Meaning of ‘now’ and other temporal location adverbs. In Aloni, Maria, Bastiaanse, Harald, de Jager, Tikitu & Schulz, Katrin (eds.), Logic, Language and Meaning: 17th Amsterdam Colloquium, revised selected papers, 183192. Heidelberg: Springer.
Anand, Pranav & Nevins, Andrew. 2004. Shifty operators in changing contexts: Indexicals in Zazaki and Slave. In Watanabe, Ken & Young, Robert B. (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 14, 2037. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Asher, Nicholas & Lascarides, Alex. 2003. Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Banfield, Ann. 1982. Unspeakable sentences. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Brennan, Jonathan & Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Processing events: Behavioral and neuromagnetic correlates of aspectual coercion. Brain & Language 106, 132143.
Caenepeel, Mimo. 1995. Aspect and text structure. Linguistics 33, 213253.
Caenepeel, Mimo & Moens, Marc. 1994. Temporal structure and discourse structure. In Vet, Co & Vetters, Carl (eds.), Tense and aspect in discourse, 520. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Caenepeel, Mimo & Sandström, Görel. 1992. A discourse-level approach to the past perfect in narrative. In Aurnague, Michel, Borillo, Andrée, Borillo, Mario & Bras, Myriam (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th European Workshop on Semantics of Time, Space, and Movement and Spatio-temporal Reasoning, 167181. Toulouse: Université Paul Sabatier.
Carlson, Gregory. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Chatman, Seymour. 1980. Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Dahlgren, Katheleen, McDowell, Joyce & Stabler, Edward. 1989. Knowledge representation for commonsense reasoning with text. Computational Linguistics 15, 149170.
De Swart, Henriëtte. 1998. Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16, 347385.
Dölling, Johannes. 2014. Aspectual coercion and eventuality structure. In Robering, Klaus (ed.), Aspects, phases, and arguments: Topics in the semantics of verbs, 189226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Doron, Edit. 1991. Point of view as a factor of content. In Moore, Steven K. & Wyner, Adam Zachary (eds.), Proceedings of SALT, vol. I, 5164. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Dowty, David. 1986. The effects of aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse: Semantics or pragmatics? Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 3761.
Dry, Helen. 1983. The movement of narrative time. Journal of Literary Semantics 12, 1953.
Egg, Markus. 2005. Flexible semantics for reinterpretation phenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Hinrichs, Erhard. 1986. Temporal anaphora in discourse in English. Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 6382.
Hopper, Paul. 1979. Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Givón, Talmy (ed.), Discourse and syntax (Syntax and Semantics 12), 213241. New York: Academic Press.
Hunter, Julie. 2010. Presuppositional indexicals. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
Hunter, Julie. 2012. Now: A discourse-based theory. In Aloni, Maria, Kimmelman, Vadim, Roelofsen, Floris, Sassoon, Galit W., Schulz, Katrin & Westera, Matthijs (eds.), Logic, Language and Meaning: 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, revised selected papers, 371380. Heidelberg: Springer.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. The architecture of language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kamp, Hans & Reyle, Uwe. 1993. From discourse to logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kamp, Hans & Rohrer, Christian. 1983. Tense in texts. In Bäuerle, Rainer, Schwarze, Christoph & von Stechow, Armin (eds.), Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, 250269. Berlin: De Gruyer.
Kehler, Andrew. 2002. Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse, and empathy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the inner city. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, William & Waletzky, Joshua. 1967. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In Helm, June (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts, 1244. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. [Reprinted in 1997, Journal of Narrative and Life History 7, 1–38.]
Lascarides, Alex & Asher, Nichoals. 1993. Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 437493.
Lascarides, Alex & Asher, Nicholas. 2007. Segmented Discourse Representation Theory: Dynamic semantics with discourse structure. In Bunt, Harry & Muskens, Richard (eds.), Computing meaning, vol. 3, 87124. Dordrecht: Springer.
Lee, EunHee. 2008. Aspectual and focus adverbs in English and Korean. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26, 339358.
Lee, EunHee. 2010. Pluperfects in Korean and English discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42, 766780.
Lee, EunHee & Choi, Jeongmi. 2009. Two nows in Korean. Journal of Semantics 26, 87107.
Mair, Christian. 2012. Progressive and continuous aspect. In Binnick, Robert I. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 803827. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moens, Marc & Steedman, Mark. 1988. Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics 14, 1528.
Oshima, David. 2006. Perspective in reported discourse. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
Partee, Barbara H. 1984. Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 243286.
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Recanati, Franc¸ois. 2004. Indexicality and context shift. Presented at the Workshop on Indexicals, Speech Acts and Logophors, Harvard University.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1967. Elements of symbolic logic. New York: Academic Press.
Reinhart, Tanya. 1984. Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics 22, 779809.
Rothstein, Susan. 2004. Structuring events: A study in the semantics of lexical aspect. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Schlenker, Phillip. 2003. A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 29120.
Schlenker, Phillip. 2004. Context of thought and context of utterance (a note on Free Indirect Discourse and the historical present). Mind and Language 19, 279304.
Sharvit, Yael. 2008. The puzzle of free indirect discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 31, 353395.
Smessaert, Hans & ter Meulen, Alice G. B.. 2004. Temporal reasoning with aspectual adverbs. Linguistics and Philosophy 27, 209261.
Speas, Margaret. 2000. Person and point of view in Navajo verbs. In Carnie, Andrew, Jelinek, Eloise & Willie, Mary (eds.), Papers in honor of Ken Hale (MIT Working Papers in Endangered and Less Familiar Languages 1), 1938. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
van Eijck, Jan & Kamp, Hans. 1997. Representing discourse in context. In van Benthem, Jan & ter Meulen, Alice G. B. (eds.), Handbook of logic and language, 181237. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Webber, Bonnie. 1988. Tense as discourse anaphor. Computational Linguistics 14, 6173.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed