Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Representing argument structure 1


Existing approaches to the representation of argument structure in grammar tend to focus either on semantics or on syntax. Our goal in this paper is to strike the right balance between the two levels by proposing an analysis that maintains the independence of the syntactic and semantic aspects of argument structure, and, at the same time, captures the interplay between the two levels. Our proposal is set in the context of the development of a large-scale grammar of Modern Hebrew within the framework of Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG). Consequently, an additional challenge it faces is to reconcile two conflicting desiderata: to be both linguistically coherent and realistic in terms of the grammar engineering effort. We present a novel representation of argument structure that is fully implemented in HPSG, and demonstrate its many benefits to the coherence of our Hebrew grammar. We also highlight the additional dimensions of linguistic generalization that our proposal provides, which we believe are also applicable to grammars of other languages.

Corresponding author
Author’s address: University of Haifa, Israel
Author’s address: The Open University, Israel
Author’s address: University of Haifa, Israel
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Marco Baroni , Silvia Bernardini , Adriano Ferraresi  & Eros Zanchetta . 2009. The WaCky wide web: A collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Language Resources And Evaluation 43.3, 209226.

Emily M. Bender , Dan Flickinger  & Stephan Oepen . 2002. The grammar matrix: An open-source starter-kit for the rapid development of cross-linguistically consistent broad-coverage precision grammars. In Coling-02 Workshop on Grammar Engineering and Evaluation, 17. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics; doi:10.3115/1118783.111878.

Francis Bond , Stephan Oepen , Eric Nichols , Dan Flickinger , Erik Velldal  & Petter Haugereid . 2011. Deep open-source machine translation. Machine Translation 25.2, 87105.

Gosse Bouma , Rob Malouf  & Ivan Sag . 2001. Satisfying constraints on extraction and adjunction. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19, 165.

Ann Copestake , Dan Flickinger , Carl Pollard  & Ivan A. Sag . 2005. Minimal recursion semantics: An introduction. Research on Language and Computation 3.2–3, 281332;

Anthony R. Davis  & Jean-Pierre Koenig . 2000. Linking as constraints on word classes in a hierarchical lexicon. Language 76.1, 5691.

David Dowty . 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67.3, 547619.

Joseph E. Emonds 1991. Subcategorization and syntax-based theta-role assignment. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 9.3, 369429.

Charles J. Fillmore 2012. Encounters with language. Computational Linguistics 38.4, 701718.

Charles J. Fillmore , Christopher R. Johnson  & Miriam R. L. Petruck . 2003. Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography 16.3, 235250.

Dan Flickinger . 2000. On building a more efficient grammar by exploiting types. Natural Language Engineering 6.1, 1528; doi:10.1017/S1351324900002370.

Ray Jackendoff . 1985. Multiple subcategorization and the ${\it\vartheta}$ -criterion: The case of climb. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3.3, 271295.

Martha Palmer , Dan Gildea  & Paul Kingsbury . 2005. The proposition bank: A corpus annotated with semantic roles. Computational Linguistics 31.1, 71106.

Ivan A. Sag  & Carl Pollard . 1991. An integrated theory of complement control. Language 67, 63113.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 10
Total number of PDF views: 88 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 507 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.