Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-07T13:01:21.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dutch foot and the chanted call

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Carlos Gussenhoven
Carlos Gussenhoven
Affiliation:
University of Nijmegen, Vakgroep Engels-Amerikaans, Erasmusplein 1, NL 6525 HT Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Algorithms for the assignment of main word stress in Dutch have never been systematically tested against foot-based segmental processes. The assumption has apparently been that such processes do not exist. In this article, it is suggested that Dutch has at least four segmental rules that make reference to the foot, and that Dutch has a chanted intonation contour whose realization is governed by foot structure. The evidence provided by all these processes largely confirms the more recent proposals for Dutch foot structure, including Kager (1989) and Trommelen & Zonneveld (1989), except where they fail to conform to (1).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 37 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beckman, M. & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1986). Intonational structure of English and Japanese. Phonology Yearbook 3. 311–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berendsen, E. & Zonneveld, W. (1985). Nederlandse schwa-invoeging op z'n Deens. Spektator 14. 166–196.Google Scholar
Berg, R. van den, Gussenhoven, C. & Rietveld, A. (1992). Downstep in Dutch: implications for a model. In Docherty, G. J. & Ladd, D. R. (eds.) Papers in laboratory phonology II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 335–367.Google Scholar
Booij, G. E. (1984). Syllabestruktuur en verkleinwoordsvorming in het Nederlands. GLOT 7. 207–226.Google Scholar
Booij, G. E. (1988). On the relation between lexical phonology and prosodic phonology. In Bertinetto, P. M. & Loporcaro, M. (eds.), Certamen phonologicum. Turin: Rosenberg & Selier. 63–76.Google Scholar
Gibbon, D. (1976). Perspectives on intonation analysis. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. (1984). Constraining metrical theory: a modular theory of rhythm and destressing. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Haverkamp-Lubbers, R. & Kooij, J. G. (1971). Het verkleinwoord in het Nederlands. Publikaties van het Instituut voor Algemene Taalwetenschap, Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1981). A metrical theory of stress rules. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge MA. Distributed by Indiana University Lingusitics Club. Published by Garland Press, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1991). Metrical stress theory: principles and case studies. Draft. UCLA.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. & Lahiri, A. (1991). Bengali intonational phonology. NLLT 9. 47–96.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. & Lahiri, A. (1992). Durationally specified intonation in English and Bengali. In Carlson, R., Nord, L. & Sundberg, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1990 Wenner-Gren Center Conference on Music, Language, Speech, and Brain. 78–91.Google Scholar
Hermans, B. (1992). On the representation of quasi-long vowels in Dutch and Limburgian. In Bok-Bennema, R. & van Hout, R. (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands 1992. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 75–86.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (1981). A lexical-prosodic approach toward stress in Dutch. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (1984). Syllable structure and stress in Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (1985). Ambisyllabicity in Dutch. In Bennis, H. & Beukema, F. (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands 1985. Dordrecht: Foris. 57–66.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der & Moortgat, M. (1981). Prosodische fonologie en de accentuatie van Nederlandse woorden of: leeft het Nederlands op grote voet? Verslag 150e Vergadering van de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Fonetische Wetenschappen. 1–25.Google Scholar
Inkelas, S. (1989). Prosodic constituency in the lexicon. PhD thesis, Standford University.Google Scholar
Kager, R. W. J. (1985). Cycliciteit, klemtoon, en HGI. Spektator 14. 326–331.Google Scholar
Kager, R. W. J. (1989). A metrical theory of stress and destressing in English and Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kager, R. & Ellis, Visch (1988). Metrical constituency and rhythmic adjustment. Phonology 5. 21–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kager, R. & Zonneveld, W. (1986). Schwa, syllables, and extrametricality in Dutch. The Linguistic Review 5. 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, D. (1976). Syllable-based generalizations in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Kooij, J. (1982). Epenthetische schwa: Processen, regels, domeinen. Spekiator 11. 315–325.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (1978). Stylized intonation. Lg 54. 517–540.Google Scholar
Lahiri, A. & Koreman, J. (1987). Syllable weight and quantity in Dutch. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 7. 217–228.Google Scholar
Langeweg, S. J. (1988). The stress system of Dutch. PhD Dissertation. University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. (1975). The intonational system of English. MIT Dissertation. Reproduced by Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1978.Google Scholar
Neijt, A. & Zonneveld, W. (1982). Metrische fonologie: de representatie van klemtoon in Nederlandse monomorfematische woorden. De Nieuwe Taalgids 75. 527–547.Google Scholar
Nespor, M. & Vogel, M. (1986). Prosodicphonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1980). The phonetics and phonology of English intonation. MIT Dissertation. Published by Garland Press, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
Trommelen, M. (1983). The syllable in Dutch: with special reference to diminutive formation. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trommelen, M. & Zonneveld, W. (1989). Klemtoon en metrische fonologie. Muiden: Coutinho.Google Scholar
Yip, M. (1989). Contour tones. Phonology 6. 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwaardemaker, H. & Eijkman, L. P. H. (1928). Leerboek der Phonetiek. Haarlem: Bohn.Google Scholar