Skip to main content

Expressive particle verbs and conditions on particle fronting 1


In this paper, we propose a new distinction between expressive and non-expressive particle verbs in German. The basic observation for our proposal is that these two classes behave differently in the domain of particle fronting. In order to explain this difference, we will show that certain particle verbs are extreme degree expressions and that, therefore, a possible contrast across degrees makes fronting acceptable, even when the particle in isolation is non-contrastable. Our claims are supported by a rating study probing German native speakers’ intuitions about the likelihood of the occurrence of an utterance, without relying on acceptability judgments. We connect these new findings to other forms of non-information-structural fronting patterns that endow utterances with an emphatic flavor.

Corresponding author
Author’s address: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, 210 Panama Street, Stanford, CA 94305-4115, USA
Author’s address: Department of Linguistics, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0108, USA
Hide All
[1] This article has benefited from discussion with Farrell Ackerman, Josef Bayer, Silvio Cruschina, Werner Frey, Joachim Jacobs, and Stefano Quaglia. We thank three anonymous JL referees and Ewa Jaworska for their careful comments. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the German Research Foundation (DFG grants BA 1178/9-1 and TR 1228/2-1) and from the DFG Excellence Initiative (University of Konstanz, project No. 610/14).
Hide All
Arnold, Jennifer E., Kaiser, Elsi, Kahn, Jason M. & Kim, Lucy K.. 2013. Information structure: Linguistic, cognitive, and processing approaches. WIREs Cognitive Science 4, 403413.
Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baayen, R. Harald, Davidson, Doug & Bates, Douglas. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 390412.
Barr, Dale J., Levy, Roger, Scheepers, Christoph & Tily, Harry J.. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68, 255278.
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin & Bolker, Ben. 2012. Ime4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. Retrieved from (R package version 0.999999-0).
Bergen, Leon, Goodman, Noah D. & Levy, Roger. 2012. That’s what she (could have) said: How alternative utterances affect language use. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 120125.
Bianchi, Valentina. 2015. Focus fronting and the syntax–semantics interface. In Ur Shlonsky(ed.), Beyond functional sequence, 6072. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bianchi, Valentina, Bocci, Giuliano & Cruschina, Silvio. in press. Focus fronting, unexpectedness, and evaluative implicatures. Semantics & Pragmatics.
Caudal, Patrick & Nicolas, David. 2005. Types of degrees and types of event structures. In Maienborn, Claudia & Wöllstein, Angelika (eds.), Event arguments: Foundations and applications, 277300. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cruschina, Silvio. 2012. Discourse-related features and functional projections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cruse, D. A. 1986. Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
d’Avis, Franz. 2013. Exklamativsatz. In Meibauer, Jörg, Steinbach, Markus & Altmann, Hans (eds.), Satztypen des Deutschen, 171201. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dehé, Nicole. 2015. Particle verbs in Germanic. In Müller, Peter O., Ohnheiser, Ingeborg, Olsen, Susan & Rainer, Franz (eds.), Word formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe, 611626. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1, 3352.
den Besten, Hans & Webelhuth, Gert. 1990. Stranding. In Grewendorf, Günther & Sternefeld, Wolfgang (eds.), Scrambling and barriers, 7792. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2002. Against remnant VP-movement. In Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena, Barbiers, Sjef & Gärtner, Hans-Martin (eds.), Dimensions of movement: From features to remnants, 91126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2003. Surprising specifiers and cyclic spellout. Generative Linguistics in Poland 5, 2946.
Farkas, Donka F. & Bruce, Kim B.. 2010. On reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of Semantics 27, 81118.
Fodor, Jerry A. 1972. Troubles about actions. In Davidson, Donald & Harman, Gilbert (eds.), Semantics of natural language, 4869. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Frazier, Lyn, Dillon, Brian & Clifton, Charles. 2015. A note on interpreting damn expressives: Transferring the blame. Language and Cognition 7, 291304.
Frey, Werner. 2010. Ā-Movement and conventional implicatures: About the grammatical encoding of emphasis in German. Lingua 120, 14161435.
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, Peter & Morgan, Jerry L. (eds.), Speech acts (Syntax and Semantics 3), 4158. New York: Academic Press.
Grosz, Patrick G. 2012. On the grammar of optative constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3, 199244.
Heine, Antje, Jacobs, Joachim & Külpmann, Robert. 2010. Quer zu den Feldern: Zur Topologie von Partikelverben. Linguistische Berichte 221, 3760.
Hunston, Susan & Thompson, Geoffrey. 2000. Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jacobs, Joachim. 1991. Focus ambiguities. Journal of Semantics 8, 136.
Kennedy, Christopher & McNally, Louise. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81, 345381.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1994. The event argument and the semantics of voice. Ms. University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Kratzer, Angelika. 2012. Modals and conditionals: New and revised perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krifka, Manfred & Musan, Renate. 2012a. Information structure: Overview and linguistic issues. In Krifka & Musan (eds.), 144.
Krifka, Manfred & Musan, Renate (eds.). 2012b. The expression of information structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Levy, Roger. 2008. Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition 106, 11261177.
Lüdeling, Anke. 2001. On particle verbs and similar constructions in German. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Maas, Andrew L., Daly, Raymond E., Pham, Peter T., Huang, Dan, Ng, Andrew Y. & Potts, Christopher. 2011. Learning word vectors for sentiment analysis. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 142150.
Maienborn, Claudia & Schäfer, Martin. 2011. Adverbs and adverbials. In von Heusinger, Klaus, Maienborn, Claudia & Portner, Paul (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 2, 13901420. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
McIntyre, Andrew. 2001. German double particles as preverbs: Morphology and conceptual semantics. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Morzycki, Marcin. 2012. Adjectival extremeness: Degree modification and contextually restricted scales. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30, 576609.
Müller, Gereon. 1998. Incomplete category fronting. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Müller, Gereon. 2004. Verb-second as vP-first. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 7, 179234.
Müller, Stefan. 2002. Complex predicates: Verbal complexes, resultative constructions and particle verbs in German. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Myers, James. 2009. Syntactic judgment experiments. Language and Linguistics Compass 3, 406423.
Noonan, Máire. 2010. Á to zu. In Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi (eds.), Mapping spatial PPs, 161195. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paradis, Carita. 2001. Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics 12, 4765.
Portner, Paul & Rubinstein, Aynat. in press. Extreme and non-extreme deontic modals. In Nate Charlow & Matthew Chrisman (eds.), Deontic modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Potts, Christopher. 2007a. Conventional implicatures: A distinguished class of meanings. In Ramchand, Gillian & Reiss, Charles (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 475501. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Potts, Christopher. 2007b. The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33, 165198.
Potts, Christopher. 2012. Conventional implicature and expressive content. In Maienborn, Claudia, von Heusinger, Klaus & Portner, Paul (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 3, 25162536. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rett, Jessica. 2011. Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy 34, 411442.
Rohde, Hannah & Kehler, Andrew. 2014. Grammatical and information-structural influences on pronoun production. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience 29, 912927.
Rohde, Hannah, Levy, Roger & Kehler, Andrew. 2011. Anticipating explanations in relative clause processing. Cognition 118, 339358.
Schlenker, Philippe. 2007. Expressive presuppositions. Theoretical Linguistics 33, 237245.
Skopeteas, Stavros. 2012. The empirical investigation of information structure. In Krifka & Musan (eds.), 216–246.
Skopeteas, Stavros & Fanselow, Gisbert. 2011. Focus and the exclusion of alternatives: On the interaction of syntactic structure with pragmatic inference. Lingua 121, 16931706.
Spector, Benjamin. 2005. Scalar implicatures: Exhaustivity and Gricean reasoning. In Aloni, Maria, Butler, Alastair & Dekker, Paul (eds.), Questions in dynamic semantics, 229254. Leiden: Brill.
Steube, Anita. 2001. Correction by contrastive focus. Theoretical Linguistics 27, 215249.
Stiebels, Barbara. 1996. Lexikalische Argumente und Adjunkte. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Stiebels, Barbara & Wunderlich, Dieter. 1994. Morphology feeds syntax: The case of particle verbs. Linguistics 32, 913968.
Trotzke, Andreas. 2015. Rethinking syntactocentrism: Architectural issues and case studies at the syntax–pragmatics interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Trotzke, Andreas & Quaglia, Stefano. in press. Particle topicalization and German clause structure. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics.
Trotzke, Andreas, Quaglia, Stefano & Wittenberg, Eva. 2015. Topicalization in German particle verb constructions: The role of semantic transparency. Linguistische Berichte 244, 407424.
Webelhuth, Gert & Ackerman, Farrell. 1999. A lexical-functional analysis of predicate topicalization in German. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literature 1, 161.
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2000. The structure(s) of particle verbs. Ms., McGill University.
Xiang, Ming & Kuperberg, Gina R.. 2015. Reversing expectations during discourse comprehension. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience 30, 648672.
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Portner, Paul. 2003. Exclamative clauses: At the syntax–semantics interface. Language 79, 3981.
Zeller, Jochen. 2001. Particle verbs and local domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zeller, Jochen. 2003. Moved preverbs in German: Displaced or misplaced?In Booij, Geert & van Kemenade, Ans (eds.), The yearbook of morphology, 179212. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 160 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 474 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.