We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Diagnosing syntax (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 46). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. xvii + 596.
Review products
Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Diagnosing syntax (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 46). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. xvii + 596.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
15 October 2014
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
REFERENCES
Baker, Mark. 1985. The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry16, 373–415.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Davies, William D. & Dubinsky, Stanley. 2004. The grammar of raising and control: A course in syntactic argumentation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mohammad, Mohammad. 1989. The sentential structure of Arabic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Soames, Scott & Perlmutter, David. 1979. Syntactic argumentation and the structure of English. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar