Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Scontras, Gregory Fuchs, Zuzanna and Polinsky, Maria 2015. Heritage language and linguistic theory. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6,

    Goodluck, Helen 2011. First language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, Vol. 2, Issue. 1, p. 47.

    Lieven, Elena and Brandt, Silke 2011. The constructivist approach. Infancia y Aprendizaje, Vol. 34, Issue. 3, p. 281.

    Polinsky, Maria 2011. REANALYSIS IN ADULT HERITAGE LANGUAGE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 33, Issue. 02, p. 305.

    Goodluck, Helen 2010. Object extraction is not subject to Child Relativized Minimality. Lingua, Vol. 120, Issue. 6, p. 1516.

    Brandt, Silke Kidd, Evan Lieven, Elena and Tomasello, Michael 2009. The discourse bases of relativization: An investigation of young German and English-speaking children's comprehension of relative clauses. Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. 20, Issue. 3,


Merge and binding in child relative clauses: the case of Irish

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 13 October 2006

This study investigates whether children learning Irish as a first language show a preference for one or other of the two mechanisms for relative clause formation used in the adult language (movement and binding), and what details of the grammar of Irish relative clauses children are sensitive to. Our results suggest that Irish-speaking children have acquired both a movement and a binding mechanism for relativization by age five, and that they additionally have a non-movement mechanism for forming subject relatives, one that is not licensed in adult Irish. The data is discussed in the context of other studies of relativization in child language, cross-linguistic evidence and the computation of binding structures in language production and processing.

Corresponding author
Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, U.K. E-mail:
Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland. E-mail:
Centre for Language and Communication Studies, Trinity, College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland. E-mail:
Hide All
This work was supported by Social Science and Research Council of Canada grant # 410-98-0511 to Helen Goodluck and Eithne Guilfoyle; additional financial support for the purchase of recording equipment was provided by Bord na Gaeilge. The work was begun while Goodluck was at the University of Ottawa and Guilfoyle at the University of Calgary. For helpful comments we are grateful to two anonymous JL referees and to audiences at the Celtic Linguistics Conference, University College Dublin, 2001; the Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, 2003; and the Canadian Linguistics Association Annual Meeting, Winnipeg, 2004. We are indebted to Diarmuid Ó Sé for his advice on the dialect. Many thanks to Sheila Scott for her transcription of the data, to our child and adult subjects for taking part, and to the teachers and parents who facilitated access to the children. Ewa Jaworska and a JL proofreader provided expert and patient editorial help.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *