Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Moving along paths in space and time 1

  • TUOMAS HUUMO (a1)
Abstract

In cognitive linguistics, motion metaphors of time (e.g. Christmas is approaching, We left the crisis behind) have been actively studied during the last decades. In addition to motion verbs, prepositional expressions are an important element in such metaphors. This work combines insights from Cognitive Grammar and Conceptual Metaphor Theory to account for uses of English path prepositions in motion metaphors of time. It is argued that such expressions conceptualize time as a path where a mover is advancing. The nature of the mover varies: it can be an individual entity metaphorically in motion (e.g. We went THROUGH a hard winter), an extended period of time (e.g. The period of Daylight Saving Time goes on PAST September), or the temporal profile of a process (e.g. I slept THROUGH the afternoon). The nature of the mover correlates with the grammatical function of the path expression, which alternates between a complement of a motion verb and a free modifier. Accordingly, the time path can relate with figurative (motion-related) or veridical (duration-related) conceptualizations of time. While a spatial path is direction-neutral, a time path can, with few exceptions, only be scrutinized in the earlier $\rightarrow$ later direction.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Author’s address: Hämeenkatu 1, Department of Finnish and Finno-Ugric Languages, School of Languages and Translation Studies, 20014 University of Turku, Finland thuumo@utu.fi
Footnotes
Hide All
[1]

This research was funded by the Academy of Finland (Project 285739) and the Finnish Cultural Foundation (Grant 152335). I thank the three anonymous referees of Journal of Linguistics for their invaluable feedback on earlier versions of this work. I also thank Ellen Valle for correcting my English.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Bender, Andrea & Beller, Sieghard. 2014. Mapping spatial frames of reference onto time: A review of theoretical accounts and empirical findings. Cognition 132, 342382.
Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. A unified analysis of the English bare plural. Linguistics and Philosophy 1.3, 413456.
Cuyckens, Hubert. 1995. Family resemblance in the Dutch spatial prepositions doorand langs . Cognitive Linguistics 6.2/3, 183208.
Dewell, Robert D. 2007. Moving around: The role of the conceptualizer in semantic interpretation. Cognitive Linguistics 18.3, 383415.
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67.3, 547619.
Duffy, Sara & Feist, Michele. 2014. Individual differences in the interpretation of ambiguous statements about time. Cognitive Linguistics 25.1, 2954.
Evans, Vyvyan. 2004. The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Evans, Vyvyan. 2013. Language and time: A cognitive linguistic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1985. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. [2nd edn., with a new foreword, published by Cambridge University Press, 1994]
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1997. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gawron, Jean Mark. 2007. Paths and the language of change. Ms., San Diego State University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250392505_Paths_and_the_Language_of_Change(accessed 5 December 2017).
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. From space to time: Temporal adverbials in the world’s languages (LINCOM studies in theoretical linguistics 3). München: Lincom Europa.
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederieke. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Huumo, Tuomas. 2013. Many ways of moving along a path: What distinguishes prepositional and postpositional uses of Finnish path adpositions. Lingua 133, 319335.
Huumo, Tuomas. 2017. The grammar of temporal motion: A Cognitive Grammar account of motion metaphors of time. Cognitive Linguistics 28.1, 143.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991a. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991b. Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar (Cognitive Linguistics Research 1). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Virtual reality. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29.2, 77103.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2012. Linguistic manifestations of the space–time (dis)analogy. In Filipovic, Luna & Jaszczolt, Kasia (eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures, vol. I: Linguistic diversity (Human Cognitive Processing 36), 191216. Berlin: DeGruyter Mouton.
Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lindstromberg, Seth. 2010. English prepositions explained, revised edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Moore, Kevin Ezra. 2011. Frames and the experiential basis of the Moving Time metaphor. Constructions and Frames 3.1, 80103.
Moore, Kevin Ezra. 2014a. The spatial language of time (Human Cognitive Processing 42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Moore, Kevin Ezra. 2014b. The two-Mover hypothesis and the significance of “direction of motion” in temporal metaphors. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12.2, 375409.
Radden, Günter & Dirven, René. 2007. Cognitive English grammar (Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Svorou, Soteria. 1994. The grammar of space (Typological Studies in Language 25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sweetser, Eve. 1997. Role and individual interpretations of change predicates. In Nuyts, Jan & Pederson, Eric (eds.), Language and conceptualization (Language, Culture, and Cognition 1), 116136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Talmy, Leonard. 2007. The representation of spatial structure in spoken and signed language. In Hickmann, Maya & Robert, Stéphane (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (Typological Studies in Language 66), 207238. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tenbrink, Thora. 2007. Space, time, and the use of language: An investigation of relationships. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tenbrink, Thora. 2011. Reference frames of space and time in language. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 704722.
Zwarts, Joost. 2005. Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths. Linguistics and Philosophy 28, 739779.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 30
Total number of PDF views: 204 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 461 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 14th December 2017 - 17th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.