Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T20:18:49.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nostalgic views from Building 20

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Geoffrey K. Pullum
Geoffrey K. Pullum
Affiliation:
Stevenson College, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, U.S.A. E-mail: gkp@ling.ucsc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , March 1996 , pp. 137 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Stephen R. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon. (1971). Questions. Linguistic Inquiry 2. 153–166.Google Scholar
Black, J. A. (1989). The Babylonian grammatical tradition: the first grammars of Sumerian. Transactions of the Philological Society 1989. 75–99.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. (1966). Topics in the theory of generative grammar. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. (1980). On binding. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 1–46.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. (1963). Linguistic science and logic. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. (1970). Three reasons for not deriving kill from cause to die. Linguistic Inquiry 1. 429–438Google Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge. (1973). Unacceptable ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry 4. 17–68.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Pauline. (1974). How a nonderivational grammar might (or might not) work. Berkeley Studies in Syntax and Semantics, Volume I, VII/1–28. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Human Learning, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. (1994). Phonology in generative grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. (1968). Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure. Papers from the Fourth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 71–80. (Reprinted in James, D. McCawley (1976). Grammar and meaning. New York: Academic Press. 35–58.)Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. (1970). English as a VSO language. Language 46. 286–299.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. (1986). Linguistic theory in America. (2nd ed.) Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. (1972). The best theory. In Peters, P. Stanley (ed.) Goals of linguistics theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 131–170.Google Scholar