Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T10:17:37.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the transitivity of the part-whole relation1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

D. A. Cruse
D. A. Cruse
Affiliation:
Department of General Linguistics, University of Manchester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The expression is part of can be used in a number of different senses. One might cite as examples:A sheep is part of a flock. A priest is part of the clergy. Changing nappies is part of being a mother.A petal is part of a flower. But one does not ask What are the parts of the clergy? or What are the parts of being a mother? as one might ask What are the parts of a flower? or What are the parts of the human body? I shall refer to the latter as ‘structural parts’, to distinguish them from the rest; it is with the relation between structural parts and their wholes that the present paper will be concerned. This relation can also be expressed by sentences of the form A flower has petals, The human body has arms, etc. (The verb have can, of course, also be used in senses irrelevant to the present discussion.) The part-whole relation, thus conceived, is generally recognized as being one of the fundamental sense-relations structuring the vocabulary of a language.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 1979 , pp. 29 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bever, T. G. & Rosenbaum, P. S. (1971). Some lexical structures and their empirical validity. In Steinberg, D. D. & Jakobovits, L. A. (eds), Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lehrer, A. J. (1974). Semantic fields and lexical structure. Amsterdam & London: North Holland.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1969). The organisation of lexical memory. In Talland, G. A. & Waugh, N. C. (eds), The pathology of memory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Perception and language. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar