Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bonami, Olivier 2015. Periphrasis as collocation. Morphology, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 63.


    BONAMI, OLIVIER and SAMVELIAN, POLLET 2015. The diversity of inflectional periphrasis in Persian. Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 51, Issue. 02, p. 327.


    Wittenberg, Eva Paczynski, Martin Wiese, Heike Jackendoff, Ray and Kuperberg, Gina 2014. The difference between “giving a rose” and “giving a kiss”: Sustained neural activity to the light verb construction. Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 73, p. 31.


    Karimi, Simin 2013. Introduction. Lingua, Vol. 135, p. 1.


    Lyutikova, Ekaterina and Tatevosov, Sergei 2013. Complex predicates, eventivity, and causative-inchoative alternation. Lingua, Vol. 135, p. 81.


    Bahrani, Mohammad Sameti, Hossein and Hafezi Manshadi, Mehdi 2011. A computational grammar for Persian based on GPSG. Language Resources and Evaluation, Vol. 45, Issue. 4, p. 387.


    Bender, Emily M. Drellishak, Scott Fokkens, Antske Poulson, Laurie and Saleem, Safiyyah 2010. Grammar Customization. Research on Language and Computation, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 23.


    Muller, Stefan and Ghayoomi, Masood 2010. Proceedings of the International Multiconference on Computer Science and Information Technology. p. 461.

    ×

Persian complex predicates and the limits of inheritance-based analyses1

  • STEFAN MÜLLER (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990284
  • Published online: 30 November 2009
Abstract

Persian complex predicates pose an interesting challenge for theoretical linguistics since they have both word-like and phrase-like properties. For example, they can feed derivational processes, but they are also separable by the future auxiliary or the negation prefix.

Various proposals have been made in the literature to capture the nature of Persian complex predicates, among them analyses that treat them as purely phrasal or purely lexical combinations. Mixed analyses that analyze them as words by default and as phrases in the non-default case have also been suggested.

In this paper, I show that theories that rely exclusively on the classification of patterns in inheritance hierarchies cannot account for the facts in an insightful way unless they are augmented by transformations or some similar device. I then show that a lexical account together with appropriate grammar rules and an argument composition analysis of the future auxiliary has none of the shortcomings that classification-based analyses have and that it can account for both the phrasal and the word-like properties of Persian complex predicates.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Author's address: Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Deutsche und Niederländische Philologie, Deutsche Grammatik, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, D-14195 Berlin, GermanyStefan.Mueller@fu-berlin.de
Footnotes
Hide All

I thank Mina Esmaili, Fateme Nemati, Pollet Samvelian, Yasser Shakeri, and Mehran A. Taghvaipour for help with the Persian data and for comments on an earlier version of this paper. Without their help I would not have been able to write this paper. In addition I want to thank Elham Alaee for discussion of data and Daniel Hole and Jacob Maché for comments on the paper. I thank Emily M. Bender and Felix Bildhauer for discussion. Special thanks go to Bob Borsley, Karine Megerdoomian, Ivan Sag, Pollet Samvelian, and several anonymous reviewers, whose comments on earlier versions of the paper improved it considerably. I also thank Philippa Cook for proof reading.

Research related to this paper was presented at the HPSG conference 2006 in Varna, at the Institut für Linguistik in Leipzig, at the Institut für Linguistik in Potsdam, at the Centrum für Informations und Sprachverarbeitung in Munich, at the center for Computational Linguistics of the Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, in 2008 at the conference Complex Predicates in Iranian Languages at the Université Sorbonne Nouvelle in Paris, and in 2008 at the conference Syntax of the World's Languages at the Freie Universität Berlin. I thank the respective institutions and the organizers of the HPSG conference for the invitation and all audiences for discussion.

This work was supported by a grant from Agence Nationale de la Recherche and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to the Franco-German project PER-GRAM: Theory and Implementation of a Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar for Persian (DFG MU 2822/3-1).

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Ron Artstein . 2005. Coordination of parts of words. Lingua 115, 359393.

Benjamin K. Bergen & Nancy Chang . 2005. Embodied Construction Grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In Jan-Ola Östman & Miriam Fried (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 147190. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Joan Bresnan & Sam A. Mchombo . 1995. The Lexical Integrity Principle: Evidence from Bantu. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13, 181254.

Joan Bybee . 1985. Morphology. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

William Croft . 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Peter W. Culicover & Ray Jackendoff . 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

David R. Dowty 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar (Synthese Language Library 7). Dordrecht: Reidel.

Raffaella Folli , Heidi Harley & Simin Karimi . 2005. Determinants of event type in Persian complex predicates. Lingua 115, 13651401.

Peter Thomas Geach . 1970. A program for syntax. Synthese 22, 317.

Jonathan Ginzburg & Ivan A. Sag . 2000. Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning, and use of English interrogatives (CSLI Lecture Notes 123). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Adele E Goldberg . 1996. Words by default: Optimizing constraints and the Persian complex predicate. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 22, 132146. http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/415-0900/roa-415-goldberg-2.pdf (18 October 2009).

John Haiman . 1985. Natural Syntax: Iconicity and erosion (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tilman N Höhle . 1982. Über Komposition und Derivation: Zur Konstituentenstruktur von Wortbildungsprodukten im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 1, 76112.

Paul Kay . 2005. Argument structure constructions and the argument–adjunct distinction. In Mirjam Fried & Hans C. Boas (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Back to the roots (Constructional Approaches to Language 4), 7198. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/~kay/ASCs.pdf (7 November 2006).

Tibor Kiss . 1995. Infinite Komplementation: Neue Studien zum deutschen Verbum infinitum (Linguistische Arbeiten 333). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.

Stefan Müller . 2006. Phrasal or lexical constructions? Language 82(4), 850883. http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/Pub/phrasal.html (29 October 2009).

Stefan Müller . 2009b. Towards an HPSG analysis of Maltese. In Bernard Comrie , Ray Fabri , Beth Hume , Manwel Mifsud , Thomas Stolz & Martine Vanhove (eds.), Introducing Maltese linguistics: 1st International Conference on Maltese Linguistics (Bremen/Germany, 18–20 October 2007; Studies in Language Companion Series 113), 83–112, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/Pub/maltese-sketch.html (18 October 2009).

Susanne Z Riehemann . 1998. Type-based derivational morphology. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2, 4977. http://doors.stanford.edu/~sr/morphology.ps (5 April 2009).

Michael Tomasello . 2005. Beyond formalities: The case of language acquisition. The Linguistic Review 22, 183197. http://www.eva.mpg.de/psycho/pdf/Publications_2005_PDF/Beyond_formalities_05.pdf (24 September 2007).

Richard Wiese . 1992. Prosodic phonology and its role in the processing of written language. In Günther Görz (ed.), Konvens 92.1: Konferenz ‘Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprache’. Nürnberg 7.–9. Oktober 1992 (Informatik aktuell), 139148. Berlin: Springer.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×