Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Persian complex predicates and the limits of inheritance-based analyses1

  • STEFAN MÜLLER (a1)
Abstract

Persian complex predicates pose an interesting challenge for theoretical linguistics since they have both word-like and phrase-like properties. For example, they can feed derivational processes, but they are also separable by the future auxiliary or the negation prefix.

Various proposals have been made in the literature to capture the nature of Persian complex predicates, among them analyses that treat them as purely phrasal or purely lexical combinations. Mixed analyses that analyze them as words by default and as phrases in the non-default case have also been suggested.

In this paper, I show that theories that rely exclusively on the classification of patterns in inheritance hierarchies cannot account for the facts in an insightful way unless they are augmented by transformations or some similar device. I then show that a lexical account together with appropriate grammar rules and an argument composition analysis of the future auxiliary has none of the shortcomings that classification-based analyses have and that it can account for both the phrasal and the word-like properties of Persian complex predicates.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Author's address: Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Deutsche und Niederländische Philologie, Deutsche Grammatik, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, D-14195 Berlin, GermanyStefan.Mueller@fu-berlin.de
Footnotes
Hide All
[1]

I thank Mina Esmaili, Fateme Nemati, Pollet Samvelian, Yasser Shakeri, and Mehran A. Taghvaipour for help with the Persian data and for comments on an earlier version of this paper. Without their help I would not have been able to write this paper. In addition I want to thank Elham Alaee for discussion of data and Daniel Hole and Jacob Maché for comments on the paper. I thank Emily M. Bender and Felix Bildhauer for discussion. Special thanks go to Bob Borsley, Karine Megerdoomian, Ivan Sag, Pollet Samvelian, and several anonymous reviewers, whose comments on earlier versions of the paper improved it considerably. I also thank Philippa Cook for proof reading.

Research related to this paper was presented at the HPSG conference 2006 in Varna, at the Institut für Linguistik in Leipzig, at the Institut für Linguistik in Potsdam, at the Centrum für Informations und Sprachverarbeitung in Munich, at the center for Computational Linguistics of the Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, in 2008 at the conference Complex Predicates in Iranian Languages at the Université Sorbonne Nouvelle in Paris, and in 2008 at the conference Syntax of the World's Languages at the Freie Universität Berlin. I thank the respective institutions and the organizers of the HPSG conference for the invitation and all audiences for discussion.

This work was supported by a grant from Agence Nationale de la Recherche and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to the Franco-German project PER-GRAM: Theory and Implementation of a Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar for Persian (DFG MU 2822/3-1).

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Ackerman Farrell & Webelhuth Gert. 1998. A theory of predicates (CSLI Lecture Notes 76). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Alexopoulou Theodora & Kolliakou Dimitra. 2002. On Linkhood, Topicalization and Clitic Left Dislocation. Journal of Linguistics 38.2, 193245.
Aronoff Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 22). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Artstein Ron. 2005. Coordination of parts of words. Lingua 115, 359393.
Barjasteh Darab. 1983. Morphology, syntax and semantics of Persian compound verbs: A lexicalist approach. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
Barwise Jon & Perry John. 1983. Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Becker Thomas. 1993. Back-formation, cross-formation, and ‘bracketing paradoxes’ in paradigmatic morphology. In Booij Geert & Marle Jaap van (eds.), Yearbook of morphology, vol. 6, 125. Dordrecht: Foris.
Behaghel Otto. 1932. Die deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung, vol. 4: Wortstellung: Periodenbau. Heidelberg: Carl Winters.
Bergen Benjamin K. & Chang Nancy. 2005. Embodied Construction Grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In Östman Jan-Ola & Fried Miriam (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 147190. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bierwisch Manfred. 1987. A structural paradox in lexical knowledge. In van der Meer Elke & Hoffmann J. (eds.), Knowledg- aided information processing, 141172. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Bildhauer Felix. 2008. Representing information structure in an HPSG grammar of Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, Universität Bremen.
Boas Hans C. & Sag Ivan A. (eds.). In preparation. Sign-based Construction Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Borsley Robert D. 2006. Syntactic and lexical approaches to unbounded dependencies. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 49, 3157. http://www.essex.ac.uk/linguistics/publications/errl/errl_49.pdf (14 October 2009).
Bresnan Joan & Mchombo Sam A.. 1995. The Lexical Integrity Principle: Evidence from Bantu. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13, 181254.
Bybee Joan. 1985. Morphology. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Chomsky Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Copestake Ann, Flickinger Daniel P., Pollard Carl J. & Sag Ivan A.. 2005. Minimal Recursion Semantics: An introduction. Research on Language and Computation 4.3, 281332. http://lingo.stanford.edu/sag/papers/copestake.pdf (11 October 2006).
Croft William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crysmann Berthold. 2002. Constraint-based coanalysis: Portuguese cliticisation and morphology–syntax interaction in HPSG (Saarbrücken Dissertations in Computational Linguistics and Language Technology 15). Saarbrücken: Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz und Universität des Saarlandes.
Culicover Peter W. & Jackendoff Ray. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dabir-Moghaddam Mohammad. 1997. Compound verbs in Persian. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 27.2, 2559.
Dąbrowska Ewa. 2001. From formula to schema: The acquisition of English questions. Cognitive Linguistics 11.1–2, 83102.
De Kuthy Kordula. 2002. Discontinuous NPs in German. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Dowty David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar (Synthese Language Library 7). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Embick David. 2004. On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35.3, 355392.
Family Neiloufar. 2006. Exploration of semantic space: The case of light verb constructions in Persian. Ph.D. dissertation, EHESS, Paris.
Fanselow Gisbert. 2001. Features, θ-roles, and free constituent order. Linguistic Inquiry 32.3, 405437.
Fillmore Charles J., Kay Paul & O'Connor Mary Catherine. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64.3, 501538.
Folli Raffaella, Harley Heidi & Karimi Simin. 2005. Determinants of event type in Persian complex predicates. Lingua 115, 13651401.
Francis Elaine J. & Michaelis Laura A. (eds.). 2003. Mismatch: Form–function incongruity and the architecture of grammar (CSLI Lecture Notes 163). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Gazdar Gerald. 1981. Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 155184.
Geach Peter Thomas. 1970. A program for syntax. Synthese 22, 317.
Ghomeshi Jila & Massam Diane. 1994. Lexical/syntactic relations without projection. Linguistic Analysis 23.3–4, 175217.
Ginzburg Jonathan & Sag Ivan A.. 2000. Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning, and use of English interrogatives (CSLI Lecture Notes 123). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Goldberg Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure (Cognitive Theory of Language and Culture). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg Adele E. 1996. Words by default: Optimizing constraints and the Persian complex predicate. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 22, 132146. http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/415-0900/roa-415-goldberg-2.pdf (18 October 2009).
Goldberg Adele E. 2003. Words by default: The Persian Complex Predicate Construction. In Francis & Michaelis (eds.), 117146.
Goldberg Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language (Oxford Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg Adele E., Casenhier Devin & Sethuraman Nitya. 2005. The role of prediction in construction learning. Journal of Child Language 32, 407426.
Grimshaw Jane & Mester Ralf-Armin. 1985. Complex verb formation in Eskimo. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3.1, 119.
Gunji Takao. 1986. Subcategorization and word order. In Poser William J. (ed.), The Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, 121, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Haftka Brigitta. 1981. Reihenfolgebeziehungen im Satz (Topologie). In Heidolph Karl Erich, Fläming Walter & Motsch Walter (eds.), Grundzüge einer deutschen Grammatik, 702764. Berlin: Akademie.
Haiman John. 1985. Natural Syntax: Iconicity and erosion (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haspelmath Martin. 2002. Understanding morphology (Understanding Language Series). London: Arnold.
Hinrichs Erhard W. & Nakazawa Tsuneko. 1989. Subcategorization and VP structure in German (Aspects of German VP Structure, SfS-Report-01-93). Tübingen: Eberhard-Karls-Universität.
Hinrichs Erhard W. & Nakazawa Tsuneko. 1994. Linearizing AUXs in German verbal complexes. In Nerbonne et al. (eds.), 1138.
Höhle Tilman N. 1982. Über Komposition und Derivation: Zur Konstituentenstruktur von Wortbildungsprodukten im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 1, 76112.
Jacobs Joachim. 2008. Wozu Konstruktionen? Linguistische Berichte 213, 344.
Kahnemuyipour Arsalan. 2003. Syntactic categories and Persian stress. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21.2, 333379.
Karimi Simin. 1997. Persian complex verbs: Idiomatic or compositional? Lexicology 3.2, 273318.
Karimi Simin. 2005. A Minimalist approach to scrambling: Evidence from Persian (Studies in Generative Grammar 76). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Karimi-Doostan Gholamhossein. 1997. Light verb constructions in Persian and Kurdish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Essex.
Kathol Andreas. 1994. Passives without lexical rules. In Nerbonne et al. (eds.), 237272.
Kathol Andreas. 1995. Linearization-based German syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University.
Kathol Andreas. 1999. Agreement and the syntax–morphology interface in HPSG. In Levine Robert D. & Green Georgia M. (eds.), Studies in contemporary phrase structure grammar, 223274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kathol Andreas. 2000. Linear Syntax. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kay Paul. 2005. Argument structure constructions and the argument–adjunct distinction. In Fried Mirjam & Boas Hans C. (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Back to the roots (Constructional Approaches to Language 4), 7198. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/~kay/ASCs.pdf (7 November 2006).
Kay Paul & Fillmore Charles J.. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction. Language 75.1, 133.
Keenan Edward L. & Comrie Bernard. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 6399.
Kiss Tibor. 1995. Infinite Komplementation: Neue Studien zum deutschen Verbum infinitum (Linguistische Arbeiten 333). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Koenig Jean-Pierre. 1999. Lexical relations (Stanford Monographs in Linguistics). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Krenn Brigitte & Erbach Gregor. 1994. Idioms and support verb constructions. In Nerbonne et al. (1994), 365396.
Krieger Hans-Ulrich & Nerbonne John. 1993. Feature-based inheritance networks for computational lexicons. In Briscoe Ted, Copestake Ann & Paiva Valeria de (eds.), Inheritance, defaults, and the lexicon, 90136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lüdeling Anke. 1997. Strange resultatives in German: New evidence for a semantic treatment. In Blight Ralph C. & Moosally Michelle J. (eds.), The 1997 Texas Linguistics Society Conference: The syntax and semantics of predication (Texas Linguistic Forum 38), 223233. Austin, TX: University of Texas, Department of Linguistics.
Marantz Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4.2, 201225. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/papers/v4.2-contents.html (12 November 2004).
Megerdoomian Karine. 2002. Beyond words and phrases: A unified theory of predicate composition. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California. http://www.zoorna.org/publications.html (29 March 2007).
Meurers Walt Detmar. 2000. Lexical generalizations in the syntax of German non-finite constructions (Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340 No. 145). Tübingen: Eberhard-Karls-Universität. http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~dm/papers/diss.html (19 August 2002).
Meurers Walt Detmar, Penn Gerald & Richter Fraqnk. 2002. A web-based in-structional platform for constraint-based grammar formalisms and parsing. In Radev Dragomir & Brew Chris (eds.), Effective tools and methodologies for teaching NLP and CL (Workshop held at 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics), 1825. Philadelphia, PA. http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~dm/papers/acl02.html (8 January 2004).
Michaelis Laura A. 2006. Construction Grammar. In Brown Keith (ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edn., vol. 3, 7384. Oxford: Elsevier. http://spot.colorado.edu/~michaeli/publications.html (17 January 2007).
Michaelis Laura A. & Ruppenhofer Josef. 2001. Beyond alternations: A constructional model of the German applicative pattern (Stanford Monographs in Linguistics). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Miller Philip H. & Sag Ivan A.. 1997. French clitic movement without clitics or movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 15.3, 573639.
Mohammad Jan & Karimi Simin. 1992. Light verbs are taking over: Complex verbs in Persian. The Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL), 195212.
Monachesi Paola. 1998. Italian restructuring verbs: A lexical analysis. In Hinrichs Erhard W., Kathol Andreas & Nakazawa Tsuneko (eds.), Complex predicates in nonderivational syntax (Syntax and Semantics 30), 313368. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Müller Stefan. 2002. Complex predicates: Verbal complexes, resultative constructions, and particle verbs in German (Studies in Constraint-based Lexicalism 13). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/Pub/complex.html (29 October 2009).
Müller Stefan. 2003. The morphology of German particle verbs: Solving the bracketing paradox. Journal of Linguistics 39.2, 275325. http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/Pub/paradox.html (29 October 2009).
Müller Stefan. 2005. Zur Analyse der deutschen Satzstruktur. Linguistische Berichte 201, 339. http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/Pub/satz-lb.html (29 October 2009).
Müller Stefan. 2006. Phrasal or lexical constructions? Language 82(4), 850883. http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/Pub/phrasal.html (29 October 2009).
Müller Stefan. 2007a. The Grammix CD Rom: A Software Collection for Developing Typed Feature Structure Grammars. In King Tracy Holloway & Bender Emily M. (eds.), Grammar engineering across frameworks 2007 (Studies in Computational Linguistics ONLINE). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Müller Stefan. 2007b. Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar: Eine Einführung (Stauffenburg Einführungen 17), 1st edn.Tübingen: Stauffenburg. http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/Pub/hpsg-lehrbuch.html (29 October 2009).
Müller Stefan (ed.). 2009a. 16th International Conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar, University of Göttingen, Germany. Stanford, CA, CSLI Publications.
Müller Stefan. 2009b. Towards an HPSG analysis of Maltese. In Comrie Bernard, Fabri Ray, Hume Beth, Mifsud Manwel, Stolz Thomas & Vanhove Martine (eds.), Introducing Maltese linguistics: 1st International Conference on Maltese Linguistics (Bremen/Germany, 18–20 October 2007; Studies in Language Companion Series 113), 83–112, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/Pub/maltese-sketch.html (18 October 2009).
Müller Stefan. In preparation. Grammatiktheorie: Von der Transformationsgrammatik zur beschränkungsbasierten Grammatik (Stauffenburg Einführungen). Tübingen: Stauffenburg. http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/Pub/grammatiktheorie.html (14 November 2009).
Müller Stefan & Lipenkova Janna. 2009. Serial verb constructions in Mandarin Chinese. In Müller (2009a), 213233. http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/Pub/chinese-svc.html (30 October 2009).
Müller Stefan & Samvelian Pollet. In preparation. Persian in Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar.
Nerbonne John, Netter Klaus & Pollard Carl J. (eds.). 1994. German in Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar (CSLI Lecture Notes 46). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Nunberg Geoffrey, Sag Ivan A. & Wasow Thomas. 1994. Idioms. Language 70.3, 491538.
Orgun Cemil Orhan. 1996. Sign-based morphology and phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Penn Gerald. 2004. Balancing clarity and efficiency in Typed Feature Logic through delaying. 42nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL '04), main volume, 239246. Barcelona.
Pollard Carl J. 1996. On head non-movement. In Bunt Harry & Horck Arthur van (eds.), Discontinuous constituency (Natural Language Processing 6), 279305. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [Revised version of 1990 ms.]
Pollard Carl J. & Sag Ivan A.. 1987. Information-based syntax and semantics (CSLI Lecture Notes 13). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Pollard Carl J. & Sag Ivan A.. 1994. Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar (Studies in Contemporary Linguistics). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pullum Geoffrey K. 1977. Word order universals and grammatical relations. In Cole Peter & Sadock Jerrold M. (eds.), Grammatical relations (Syntax and Semantics 8), 249277. New York: Academic Press.
Richter Frank & Sailer Manfred. 2009. Phraseological clauses as constructions in HPSG. In Müller (2009a), 297317.
Riehemann Susanne Z. 1998. Type-based derivational morphology. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2, 4977. http://doors.stanford.edu/~sr/morphology.ps (5 April 2009).
Sag Ivan A. 1997. English relative clause constructions. Journal of Linguistics 33.2, 431484. http://lingo.stanford.edu/sag/papers/rel-pap.pdf (30 May 2004).
Sag Ivan A. 2007a. Remarks on locality. In Müller Stefan (ed.), 14th International Conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 394414. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/HPSG/8/ (29 July 2007).
Sag Ivan A. 2007b. Sign-based Construction Grammar: An informal synopsis. Ms., Stanford University. http://lingo.stanford.edu/sag/papers/theo-syno.pdf (23 October 2007).
Samvelian Pollet. 2007. A (phrasal) affix analysis of the Persian Ezafe. Journal of Linguistics 43, 605645.
Saussure Ferdinand de. 1916. Grundfragen der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. [2nd edn. 1967]
Stiebels Barbara. 1996. Lexikalische Argumente und Adjunkte: Zum semantischen Beitrag verbaler Präfixe und Partikeln (Studia Grammatica 39). Berlin: Akademie.
Stiebels Barbara & Wunderlich Dieter. 1994. Morphology feeds syntax: The case of particle verbs. Linguistics 32.6, 913968.
Stump Gregory T. 1991. A paradigm-based theory of morphosemantic mismatches. Language 67.4, 675725.
Tomasello Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello Michael. 2005. Beyond formalities: The case of language acquisition. The Linguistic Review 22, 183197. http://www.eva.mpg.de/psycho/pdf/Publications_2005_PDF/Beyond_formalities_05.pdf (24 September 2007).
Tomasello Michael. 2006a. Construction Grammar for kids. Constructions, special volume 1. http://www.constructions-online.de/articles/specvol1/689 (11 January 2009).
Tomasello Michael. 2006b. Konstruktionsgrammatik und früher Erstspracherwerb. In Fischer Kerstin & Stefanowitsch Anatol (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik: Von der Anwendung zur Theorie (Stauffenburg Linguistik 40), 1937. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Uszkoreit Hans. 1987. Word order and constituent structure in German (CSLI Lecture Notes 8). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Vahedi-Langrudi Mohammad Mahdi. 1996. The syntax, semantics and argument structure of complex predicates in Modern Farsi. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ottawa.
Wiese Richard. 1992. Prosodic phonology and its role in the processing of written language. In Görz Günther (ed.), Konvens 92.1: Konferenz ‘Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprache’. Nürnberg 7.–9. Oktober 1992 (Informatik aktuell), 139148. Berlin: Springer.
Wiese Richard. 1996. Phrasal compounds and the theory of word syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 27.1, 183193.
Zeller Jochen. 1999. Particle verbs, local domains, and a theory of lexical licensing. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Frankfurt.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 25 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 127 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.