Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T19:25:32.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philip Carr, Linguistic realities: an autonomist metatheory for the generative enterprise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Pp. ix + 157.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Rudolf P. Botha
Rudolf P. Botha
Affiliation:
Department of General Linguistics, University of Stellenbosch.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 221 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allan, K. (1983). Review of Katz, J., Language and other abstract objects. Lg 59. 678–683.Google Scholar
Beloff, J. (1978). Is mind autonomous? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29. 265–273.Google Scholar
Botha, R. P. (1973). The justification of linguistic hypotheses. A study of nondemonstrative inference in transformational grammar. (Janua Linguarum, Series Maior 84.) The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Botha, R. P. (1978). Protecting general-linguistic hypotheses from refutation. (Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 1. 1–38.) Stellenbosch: Department of General Linguistics.Google Scholar
Botha, R. P. (1989). The metaphysics market: l Merchandizing language as matter. (Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 20.) Stellenbosch: Department of General Linguistics.Google Scholar
Botha, R. P. (1990a). The metaphysics market: 2 Billing language as behavioural. (Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 21.) Stellenbosch: Department of General Linguistics.Google Scholar
Botha, R. P. (1990b). The metaphysics market: 3 Selling language as soul. (Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 22.) Stellenbosch: Department of General Linguistics.Google Scholar
Botha, R. P. (forthcoming). The metaphysics market: 4 Advertising language as abstract. (Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 23.) Stellenbosch: Department of General Linguistics.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1987a). Language in a psychological setting. (Sophia Linguistica 22.) Tokyo.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1987b). Generative grammar: its basis, development and prospects. SELL (special issue of Bulletin of English Department). Kyoto University, Japan.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1987c). Language and problems of knowledge. Revised version of paper delivered at a conference in Madrid, 28 April 1986.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1988a). Language and problems of knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1988b). Language and interpretation: philosophical reflections and empirical inquiry. Contribution to University of Pittsburgh Series of Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1989). Mental constructions and social reality. Paper delivered at conference on knowledge and language held in Groningen, May 1989.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1991a). Linguistics and adjacent fields: a personal view. In Asa Ksshen (ed.), 3–25.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1991b). Linguistics and cognitive science: problems and mysteries. In Asa Kashen (ed.), 26–53.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy: toward a unified science of the mind-brain. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. J. (1979). Review of Popper, K. R. & Eccles, J. C. The self and its brain: an argument for interactionism. Mind 88. 301–304.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1979). Review of Popper, K. R. & Eccles, J. C. The self and its brain: an argument for interactionism. Journal of Philosophy 76. 91–97.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. (1987). Farewell to reason. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind: an essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1985). Some notes on what linguistics is about. In Katz, J. (ed.) The philosophy of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 146–160.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1976a). Can a theory answer more questions than one of its rivals? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27. 1–23.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1976b). Is the method of bold conjectures and attempted refutations justifiably the method of science? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27. 105–136.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1976c). Ad hoc auxiliary hypotheses and falsification. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27. 329–362.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1976d). Is falsifiability the touchstone of scientific rationality? Karl Popper versus inductivism. In Cohen, R. S. & Wartofsky, M. (eds) Lakatos memorial volume (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 39). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Itkonen, E. (1983). Review of Katz, J. Language and other abstract objects. Lingua 60. 238–244.Google Scholar
Kasher, A. (ed) (1991) The Chomskyan turn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Katz, J. & Postal, P. (1989). Realism and conceptualism in linguistics. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1982). The language lottery: toward a biology of grammars. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. & Eccles, J. C. (1977). The self and its brain: an argument for interactionism. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Shaphere, D. (1969). Notes towards a post-positivistic interpretation of science. In Achinstein, P. & Barker, S. F. (eds) The legacy of logical positivism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press. 115–160.Google Scholar
Sinclair, M. (1985). The rationality of Chomsky's linguistics. (Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 14.) Stellenbosch: Department of General Linguistics.Google Scholar