Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Processing unambiguous verbal passives in German

  • NINO GRILLO (a1), ARTEMIS ALEXIADOU (a2), BERIT GEHRKE (a3), NILS HIRSCH (a4), CATERINA PAOLAZZI (a5) and ANDREA SANTI (a5)...
Abstract

Passivization played a central role in shaping both linguistic theory and psycholinguistic approaches to sentence processing, language acquisition and impairment. We present the results of two experiments that simultaneously test online processing (self-paced reading) and offline comprehension (through comprehension questions) of passives in German while also manipulating the event structure of the predicates used. In contrast to English, German passives are unambiguously verbal, allowing for the study of passivization independent of a confound in the degree of interpretive ambiguity (verbal/adjectival). In English, this ambiguity interacts with event structure, with passives of stative predicates naturally receiving an adjectival interpretation. In a recent study, Paolazzi et al. (2015, 2016) showed that in contrast to the mainstream theoretical perspective, passive sentences are not inherently harder to process than actives. Complexity of passivization in English is tied to the aspectual class of the verbal predicate passivized: with eventive predicates, passives are read faster (as hinted at in previous literature) and generate no comprehension difficulties (in contrast to previous findings with mixed predicates). Complexity effects with passivization, in turn, are only found with stative predicates. The asymmetry is claimed to stem from the temporary adjectival/verbal ambiguity of stative passives in English. We predict that the observed difficulty with English stative passives disappears in German, given that in this language the passive construction under investigation is unambiguously verbal. The results support this prediction: both offline and online there was no difficulty with passivization, under either eventive or stative predicates. In fact, passives and their rich morphology eased parsing across both types of predicates.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Author’s address: Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UKnino.grillo@york.ac.uk
Author’s address: Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin & Leibniz-Center General Linguistics (ZAS), Unter den Linden 6, 10099, Berlin, Germanyartemis.alexiadou@hu-berlin.de
Author’s address: Institut für Slawistik und Hungarologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099, Berlin, Germanyberit.gehrke@hu-berlin.de
Author’s address: Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099, Berlin, Germanynils.hirsch@hu-berlin.de
Author’s address: Department of Linguistics, University College London, 2 Wakefield Street, WC1N 1PF, London, UKcaterina.paolazzi.11@ucl.ac.uk
Author’s address: Department of Linguistics, University College London, 2 Wakefield Street, WC1N 1PF, London, UKa.santi@ucl.ac.uk
Footnotes
Hide All
[1]

Acknowledgements: This research was funded by the DFG Leibniz Prize AL 554/8-1 to Artemis Alexiadou. We are also grateful to the audience of the workshop on The Syntax of Argument Structure at the 38th Annual DGfS Conference, Konstanz, and the anonymous reviewers for the Journal of Linguistics.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian. 2015. External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach, vol. 55. USA: Oxford University Press.
Alexiadou, Artemis, Gehrke, Berit & Schäfer, Florian. 2014. The argument structure of adjectival participles revisited. Lingua 149B, 118138.
Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2003. Participle and voice. In Alexiadou, Artemis, Rathert, Monika & von Stechow, Armin (eds.), Perfect explorations, vol. 136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Armon-Lotem, Sharon, Haman, Ewa, Jensen de López, Kristine, Smoczynska, Magdalena, Yatsushiro, Kazuko, Szczerbinski, Marcin, van Hout, Angeliek, Dabašinskienė, Ineta, Gavarró, Anna, Hobbs, Erin, Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė, Laura, Katsos, Napoleon, Kunnari, Sari, Nitsiou, Chrisa, Sundahl, Lone, Xavier Parramon, Olsen, Sauerland, Uli, Torn-Leesik, Reeli & van der Lely, Heather. 2016. A large-scale cross-linguistic investigation of the acquisition of passive. Language Acquisition 23.1, 2756.
Barr, Dale J., Levy, Roger, Scheepers, Christoph & Tily, Harry J.. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68.3, 255278.
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve. 2014. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Preprint, arXiv:1406.5823.
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 1988. Psych verbs and -theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6, 291352.
Bever, Thomas G. 1970. The cognitive basis of linguistic structure. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language, 279362. New York: Wiley.
Bever, Thomas G & Poeppel, David. 2010. Analysis by synthesis: A (re-) emerging program of research for language and vision. Biolinguistics 4.2–3, 174200.
Borer, Hagit & Kenneth, Wexler. 1987. The maturation of syntax. In Roeper, Tomas & Williams, Edwin (eds.), Parameter setting, 123172. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Bott, Oliver. 2010. The processing of events, vol. 162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brennan, Jonathan & Pylkkänen, Liina. 2010. Processing psych verbs: Behavioural and meg measures of two different types of semantic complexity. Language and Cognitive Processes 25.6, 777807.
Bruening, Benjamin. 2014. Word formation is syntactic: Adjectival passives in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32.2, 363422.
Carrithers, Caroline. 1989. Syntactic complexity does not necessarily make sentences harder to understand. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18.1, 7588.
Christianson, Kiel, Hollingworth, Andrew, Halliwell, John F. & Ferreira, Fernanda. 2001. Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology 42.4, 368407.
Collins, Chris. 2005. A Smuggling approach to the passive in English. Linguistic Inquiry 36.2, 289297.
Crawford, Jean. 2012. Developmental perspectives on the acquisition of the passive: Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
de Swart, Henriëtte. 1998. Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16.2, 347385.
Eroms, Hans-Werner. 1992. Das deutsche Passiv in historischer Sicht. In Hoffmann, Ludger (ed.), Deutsche syntax: Ansichten und Aussichten, 225249. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Estrela, Antónia Pimentel. 2014. A aquisição da estrutura passiva em português europeu: Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
Fábregas, Antonio & Marín, Rafael. 2015. Deriving individual-level and stage-level psych verbs in Spanish. The Linguistic Review 32.2, 227275.
Ferreira, Fernanda. 2003. The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology 47, 164203.
Ferreira, Fernanda & Christianson, Kiel. 2016. Is now-or-never language processing good enough? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39.
Ferreira, Fernanda & Clifton, Charles J.. 1986. The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 25.3, 348368.
Ferreira, Fernanda & Patson, Nikole D. 2007. The ‘good enough’ approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass 1.1–2, 7183.
Fox, Danny & Grodzinsky, Yosef. 1998. Childrens passive: A view from the by-phrase. Linguistic Inquiry 29.2, 311332.
Gehrke, Berit. 2015. Adjectival participles, event kind modification and pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33.3, 897938.
Gehrke, Berit & Grillo, Nino. 2007. Aspects on passives. In Blaho, Sylvia, Schoorlemmer, Erik & Vicente, Luis (eds.), Proceedings of ConSOLE XIV, 121141, available at http://www.sole.leidenuniv.nl/.
Gehrke, Berit & Grillo, Nino. 2008. How to become passive. In Grohmann, Kleanthes K. (ed.), Explorations of phase theory: Features, arguments, and interpretation at the interfaces interface explorations, 231268. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Gehrke, Berit & Grillo, Nino. 2009. Event structure and the acquisition of passives. Paper presented at VII GLOW in Asia, Hyderabad.
Gennari, Silvia & Poeppel, David. 2003. Processing correlates of lexical semantic complexity. Cognition 89.1, B27B41.
Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68, 176.
Grillo, Nino. 2008. Generalized Minimality: Syntactic underspecification in Brocas Aphasia: Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.
Grodzinsky, Yosef. 1990. Theoretical perspectives on language deficit. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grodzinsky, Yosef. 1995. Trace deletion, -roles, and cognitive strategies. Brain and Language 51, 469497.
Grodzinsky, Yosef. 2000. The neurology of syntax: Language use without Brocas area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23, 171.
Hale, John T. 2001. A probabilistic Early parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Proceedings of the 2nd North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Language Technologies, 18. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Hofmeister, Philip. 2011. Representational complexity and memory retrieval in language comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes 26.3, 376405.
Horgan, Dianne D. 1978. The development of full passives. Journal of Child Language 5, 6580.
Jaeger, Florian T., Fedorenko, Evelyn, Hofmeister, Philip & Gibson, Edward. 2008. Expectation-based syntactic processing: Anti-locality effects outside of head-final languages. Paper presented at the 21st Annual CUNY Sentence Processing Conference. NC: University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill.
Just, Marcel A., Carpenter, Patricia A. & Woolley, Jaqueline D.. 1982. Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology 111, 228238.
Kamide, Yuki, Scheepers, Christoph & Altmann, Gerry TM. 2003. Integration of syntactic and semantic information in predictive processing: Cross-linguistic evidence from German and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32.1, 3755.
Karimi, Hossein & Ferreira, Fernanda. 2016. Good-enough linguistic representations and online cognitive equilibrium in language processing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 69.5, 10131040.
Knoeferle, Pia & Crocker, Matthew W.. 2006. The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: Evidence from eye tracking. Cognitive Science 30.3, 481529.
Konieczny, L. 2000. Locality and parsing complexity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29.6, 627645.
Kratzer, Angelika. 2000. Building statives. In Conathan, Lisa J. (ed.), Proceedings of the 26th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 385399. Berkeley: Berkely Linguistics Society.
Landau, Idan. 2010. The locative syntax of experiencers LI Monograph, vol. 53. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lau, Ellen, Stroud, Clare, Plesch, Silke & Phillips, Colin. 2006. The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis. Brain and Language 98.1, 7488.
Levy, Roger. 2008. Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition 106, 11261177.
Levy, Roger, Fedorenko, Evelina, Breen, Mara & Gibson, Edward. 2012. The processing of extraposed structures in English. Cognition 122.1, 1236.
Maienborn, Claudia. 2003. Die logische Form von Kopula-Sätzen. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Maienborn, Claudia. 2005. On the limits of the Davidsonian approach: The case of copula sentences. Theoretical Linguistics 31.3, 275316.
Maienborn, Claudia. 2007. Das Zustandspassiv: Grammatische Einordnung – Bildungsbeschränkung – Interpretationsspielraum. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 35, 83144.
Maratsos, Michael P., Danny, Fox, Becker, Judith E. & Chalkley, Mary A.. 1985. Semantic restrictions on children passives. Cognition 19, 167191.
McElree, Brian, Traxler, Matthew J., Pickering, Martin J., Seely, Rachel E. & Jackendoff, Ray. 2001. Reading time evidence for enriched composition. Cognition 78.1, B17B25.
McIntyre, Andrew. 2013. Adjectival passives and adjectival participles in English. In Alexiadou, Artemis & Schäfer, Florian (eds.), Non-canonical passives, 2142. John Benjamins.
Meyer, Aaron M., Mack, Jennifer E. & Thompson, Cynthia K.. 2012. Tracking passive sentence comprehension in agrammatic aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics 25.1, 3143.
Moens, Marc & Steedman, Mark. 1988. Temporal ontology and temporal reference 14.2, 1528.
Myung-Chul, Koo. 1997. Kausativ und passiv im Deutschen. Frankfurt/M: Peter Lang.
Paczynski, Martin, Jackendoff, Ray & Kuperberg, Gina. 2014. When events change their nature: The neurocognitive mechanisms underlying aspectual coercion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 26.9, 19051917.
Paolazzi, Caterina, Grillo, Nino, Alexiadou, Artemis & Santi, Andrea. 2015. Evidence against heuristic processing of English passive sentences. AMLaP (Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing). University of Malta.
Paolazzi, Caterina, Grillo, Nino, Alexiadou, Artemis & Santi, Andrea. 2016. Processing English passives: Interaction with event structure, but no evidence for heuristics. CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. University of Florida.
Piñango, Maria M., Winnick, Aaron, Ullah, Rashad & Zurif, Edgar. 2006. Time-course of semantic composition: The case of aspectual coercion. Journal of psycholinguistic research 35.3, 233244.
Piñango, Maria M., Zurif, Edgar & Jackendoff, Ray. 1999. Real-time processing implications of enriched composition at the syntax–semantics interface. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28.4, 395414.
Pitteroff, Marcel. 2009. The English eventive passive. Zulassungsarbeit: Universität Stuttgart.
Rapp, Irene. 1996. Zustand? Passiv? Überlegungen zum sogenannten Zustandspassiv. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 15.2, 231265.
Rapp, Irene. 1997. Partizipien und semantische Struktur: Zu passivischen Konstruktionen mit dem 3. Status. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.
Rohde, Douglas. 2003. The on-line processing of active and passive structures in English. Presented at the 16th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, http://tedlab.mit.edu/dr/Papers/Rohde-Gibson-CUNY2003.pdf.
Snyder, William & Hyams, Nina. 2015. Minimality effects in childrens passives. In Domenico, Elisa di, Hamman, Cornelia & Matteini, Simona (eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 223), 343368. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Staub, Adrian, Clifton, Charles & Frazier, Lyn. 2006. Heavy NP shift is the parsers last resort: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 54.3, 389406.
Staub, Adrian & Clifton, Charles Jr. 2006. Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: Evidence from either…or. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32.2, 425.
Tang, Kevin. 2014. Linger toolkit. http://tang-kevin.github.io/Tools.html.
Townsend, David J. & Bever, Thomas G.. 2001. Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules, vol. 1950. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Traxler, Matthew J. 2014. Trends in syntactic parsing: Anticipation, Bayesian estimation, and good- enough parsing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18.11, 605611.
Traxler, Matthew J., Corina, David P., Morford, Jill P., Hafer, Sara & Hoversten, Liv J.. 2014. Deaf readers response to syntactic complexity: Evidence from self-paced reading. Memory and Cognition 42, 97111.
Traxler, Matthew J., Pickering, Martin J. & McElree, Brian. 2002. Coercion in sentence processing: Evidence from eye-movements and self-paced reading. Journal of Memory and Language 47.4, 530547.
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 56, 143160.
Volpato, Francesca, Verin, Laura & Cardinaletti, Anna. 2015. The comprehension and production of verbal passives by Italian preschool-age children. Applied Psycholinguistics 37.4, 901931.
Zifonun, Gisela. 1992. Das Passiv im Deutschen: Agenten, Blockaden und (De-)Gradierungen. In Hoffmann, Ludger (ed.), Deutsche Syntax: Ansichten und Aussichten, 250275. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Zifonun, Gisela, Hoffmann, Ludger & Strecker, Bruno. 1997. Grammatik der deutschen Sprache 3. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed