Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The prosodic representation of composite structures in Brazilian Portuguese

  • NATÁLIA BRAMBATTI GUZZO (a1)
Abstract

In previous research, word–word compounds and stressed affix + word structures have been assigned to the same prosodic domain in Brazilian Portuguese (BP), on account of certain similarities in phonological behaviour (Silva 2010, Toneli 2014): both types of composite structures undergo vowel raising at the right edge of each element in the construction, and vowel sandhi processes between their elements. In this paper, I show that word–word compounds and stressed affix + word structures exhibit significant differences in stress patterns in BP, which supports their prosodization in two separate domains. While stressed affix + word structures are assigned secondary stress following the phonological word (PWd) stress algorithm, each element in word–word compounds behaves as an independent PWd with regard to the stress pattern that it exhibits. I thus propose that while stressed affix + word structures are recursively prosodized in the PWd domain, word–word compounds are prosodized in the composite group, the domain proposed by Vogel (2008, 2009) that immediately dominates the PWd and accounts for the prosodization of structures with compositional characteristics. The analysis reconciles two views on prosodic structure that are traditionally assumed to be mutually exclusive: the view that prosodic domains can be recursive (e.g. Inkelas 1990, Selkirk 1996) and the view that the prosodic hierarchy includes an additional domain specific to composite structures above the PWd (e.g. Vogel 2009, Vigário 2010).

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The prosodic representation of composite structures in Brazilian Portuguese
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The prosodic representation of composite structures in Brazilian Portuguese
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The prosodic representation of composite structures in Brazilian Portuguese
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Author’s address: McGill University, Department of Linguistics, 1085 Dr Penfield Avenue, H3A 1A7, Montreal, QC, Canadanataliaguzzo@me.com
Footnotes
Hide All
[1]

I would like to thank Heather Goad for carefully reading and commenting on earlier versions of this paper. I would also like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments, the native speakers who were consulted, as well as Elisa Battisti, Guilherme Duarte Garcia, and Irene Vogel for valuable discussion. This research was supported in part by Brazil’s Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Abaurre, Maria Bernadete. 1996. Acento frasal e processos fonológicos segmentais [Phrasal stress and segmental phonological processes]. Letras de Hoje 31.2, 4150.
Abaurre, Maria Bernadete, Galves, Charlotte, Mandel, Arnaldo & Sandalo, Filomena. 2006. Secondary stress in two varieties of Portuguese and the Sotaq optimality based computer program. Probus 18, 97125.
Battisti, Elisa. 1993. Elevac¸ão das vogais médias pretônicas em sílaba inicial de vocábulo na fala gaúcha [Raising of pretonic mid vowels in word-initial syllable in southern Brazil]. MA thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Bauer, Laurie. 1998. When is a sequence of two nouns a compound in English? English Language and Linguistics 2, 6586.
Bisetto, Antonietta. 2010. Recursiveness and Italian compounds. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 7, 1435.
Bisol, Leda. 1981. Harmonia vocálica: Uma regra variável [Vowel harmony: A variable rule]. Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
Bisol, Leda. 1992. O acento e o pé métrico binário [Stress and the binary metric foot]. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos 22, 6980.
Bisol, Leda. 2003. Sandhi in Brazilian Portuguese. Probus 15, 177200.
Bisol, Leda. 2009. O alc¸amento da pretônica sem motivac¸ão aparente [Unmotivated raising of pretonic mid vowels]. In Bisol, Leda & Collischonn, Gisela (eds.), Português do sul do Brasil: variac¸ão fonológica. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS.
Câmara, Joaquim Mattoso Jr. 1970. Estrutura da língua portuguesa [The structure of the Portuguese language]. Petrópolis: Vozes.
Collischonn, Gisela. 1994. Acento secundário em português [Secondary stress in Portuguese]. Letras de Hoje 29.4, 4355.
Elfner, Emily. 2015. Recursion in prosodic phrasing: Evidence from Connemara Irish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33.4, 11691208.
Gayer, Juliana Escalier Ludwig. 2014. Uma análise da elisão e da degeminac¸ão com base em restric¸ões. [A constraint-based analysis of elision and degemination]. Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Gravina, Aline Peixoto & Fernandes-Svartman, Flaviane. 2013. Interface sintaxe–fonologia: Desambiguac¸ão pela estrutura prosódica no português brasileiro [Syntax–phonology interface: Disambiguation through prosodic structure in Brazilian Portuguese]. Alfa 57.2, 639668.
Guzzo, Natália Brambatti. 2015. A prosodizac¸ão de clíticos e compostos em português brasileiro [The prosodic representation of clitics and compounds in Brazilian Portuguese]. Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Guzzo, Natália Brambatti. 2017. Recursion in Brazilian Portuguese complex compounds. In Lopes, Ruth, Ornelas de Avelar, Juanito & Cyrino, Sonia (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 12. Selected papers from the 45th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. The prosodic hierarchy in meter. In Kiparsky, Paul & Youmans, G. (eds.), Rhythm and meter, 201260. Orlando: Academic Press.
Hermans, Ben & Wetzels, Leo. 2012. Productive and unproductive stress patterns in Brazilian Portuguese. Revista Letras & Letras 28, 77114.
Inkelas, Sharon. 1990. Prosodic constituency in the lexicon (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics), New York: Garland Press.
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin. 1986. The phonology of voicing in Japanese: Theoretical consequences for morphological accessibility. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 4973.
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin. 2007. Prosodic adjunction in Japanese compounds. In Miyamoto, Yoichi & Ochi, Masao (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 55: Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics 4, 97111. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin. 2009. The extended prosodic word. In Grijzenhout, Janet & Kabak, Baris (eds.), Phonological domains: Universals and deviations, 135194. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin. 2013. Prosodic subcategories in Japanese. Lingua 124, 2040.
Kubozono, Haruo. 1995. Constraint interaction in Japanese phonology: Evidence from compound accent. In Walker, Rachel, Lorentz, Ove & Kubozono, Haruo (eds.), Phonology at Santa Cruz, vol. 4, 2138. UC Santa Cruz: Linguistics Research Center.
Lee, Seung Hwa. 1997. Sobre os compostos do PB [On compounds in Brazilian Portuguese]. DELTA 13, 1733.
Lee, Seung Hwa. 2002. Acento secundário do PB [Secondary stress in Brazilian Portuguese]. Letras de Hoje 37, 149162.
Lee, Seung Hwa. 2013. Interface fonologia–morfologia: Diminutivos no PB [Phonology–morphology interface: Diminutive structures in Brazilian Portuguese]. Diadorim special volume, 113125.
Leite, Yonne & Callou, Dinah. 2002. Como falam os brasileiros [How Brazilians speak]. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
Lieber, Rochelle & Stekauer, Pavol. 2009. Introduction: Status and definition of compounding. In Lieber, Rochelle & Stekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martinez-Paricio, Violeta. 2012. Superfeet as recursion. In Arnett, Nathan & Bennett, Ryan (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 259269. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings.
Moreno, Cláudio. 1997. Morfologia nominal do português: Um estudo de fonologia lexical [Nominal morphology of Portuguese: A study in lexical phonology]. Ph.D. dissertation, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.
Nespor, Marina & Ralli, Angela. 1996. Morphology–phonology interface: Phonological domains in Greek compounds. The Linguistic Review 13.3–4, 357382.
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
Oliveira, Marco Antônio de. 1992. Aspectos da difusão lexical [Aspects of lexical diffusion]. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem 1, 3141.
Partee, Barbara. 1994. Lexical semantics and compositionality. In Gleitman, Lila & Liberman, Mark (eds.), Invitation to cognitive science – Part I: Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Peperkamp, Sharon. 1997a. The prosodic structure of compounds. In Matos, Gabriela, Miguel, Matilde, Duarte, Inês & Faria, Isabel Hub (eds.), Interfaces in linguistic theory, 259279. Lisbon: APL/Colibri.
Peperkamp, Sharon. 1997b. Prosodic words. Ph.D. dissertation, Holland Academic Graphics, University of Amsterdam, The Hague.
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Rutgers University and University of Colorado at Boulder, 1993. Revised version published by Blackwell, 2004.
Rio-Torto, Grac¸a & Ribeiro, Sílvia. 2012. Portuguese compounds. Probus 24, 119145.
Sandalo, Filomena & Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2003. Some notes on phonological phrasing in Brazilian Portuguese. DELTA 19.1, 130.
Schwindt, Luiz Carlos. 2001. O prefixo no português brasileiro: Análise prosódica e lexical [Prefixes in Brazilian Portuguese: A lexical and prosodic analysis]. DELTA 17.2, 175207.
Schwindt, Luiz Carlos. 2008. Revisitando o estatuto prosódico e morfológico de palavras prefixadas do PB em uma perspectiva de restric¸ões [Revising the prosodic status and the morphological status of prefixed words in Brazilian Portuguese through a constraint-based approach]. Alfa: Revista de Lingüística 52.2, 391404.
Schwindt, Luiz Carlos. 2013. Neutralizac¸ão da vogal pretônica e formac¸ão de palavras em português brasileiro [Neutralization of pretonic vowels and word formation in Brazilian Portuguese]. Organon 28.54, 137154.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1986. On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology 3, 371405.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1996. The prosodic structure of function words. In Morgan, James L. & Demuth, Katherine (eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition, 187214. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax–phonology interface. In Goldsmith, John, Riggle, Jason & Yu, Alan (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 435483. Oxford: Blackwell.
Silva, Taís Bopp da. 2010. Formac¸ão de palavras compostas em Português Brasileiro: Uma análise de interfaces [Compound word formation in Brazilian Portuguese: An interface analysis]. Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Tenani, Luciani Ester. 2002. Domínios prosódicos no português [Prosodic domains in Portuguese]. Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.
Toneli, Priscila Marques. 2014. A palavra prosódica no português brasileiro [The prosodic word in Brazilian Portuguese]. Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.
Toneli, Priscila Marques, Vigário, Marina & Abaurre, Maria Bernadete. 2014. Distinguishing emphatic and prosodic word initial stress: Evidence from Brazilian Portuguese. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages, 172176.
Vigário, Marina. 2003. The prosodic word in European Portuguese, vol. 6. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Vigário, Marina. 2007. O lugar do grupo clítico e da palavra prosódica composta na hierarquia prosódica: Uma nova proposta [The place of the clitic group and the composite phonological word in the prosodic hierarchy: A new proposal]. In Lobo, Maria & Coutinho, Maria Antónia (eds.), Actas do XXII Encontro Nacional da Associac¸ão Portuguesa de Linguística – Textos seleccionados, 673688.
Vigário, Marina. 2010. Prosodic structure between the prosodic word and the phonological phrase: Recursive nodes or an independent domain? Linguistic Review 27, 485530.
Vigário, Marina & Fernandes-Svartman, Flaviane. 2010. A atribuic¸ão de acentos tonais em compostos no português brasileiro [Pitch accent assignment in Brazilian Portuguese compounds]. Textos selecionados do XXV Encontro Nacional da Associac¸ão Portuguesa de Linguística, 769786.
Vigário, Marina & Frota, Sónia. 2002. Prosodic word deletion in coordinate structures. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 1, 241264.
Villalva, Alina. 1994. Estruturas morfológicas: Unidades e hierarquias nas palavras do português [Morphological structures: Units and hierarchies in words in Portuguese]. Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade de Lisboa.
Vogel, Irene. 2008. The morphology–phonology interface: Isolating to polysynthetic languages. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55.1, 205226.
Vogel, Irene. 2009. The status of the clitic group. In Grijzenhout, Janet & Kabak, Baris (eds.), Phonological domains: Universals and deviations, 1546. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Vogel, Irene. 2010. The phonology of compounds. In Scalise, Sergio & Vogel, Irene (eds.), Crossdisciplinary issues in compounding, 145163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Wetzels, Leo. 1992. Mid vowel neutralization in Brazilian Portuguese. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos 23, 1955.
Zec, Draga. 2005. Prosodic differences among function words. Phonology 22.1, 77112.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed