Skip to main content Accessibility help

The role of Aktionsart in deverbal nouns: State nominalizations across languages1



Most of the literature devoted to the study of deverbal nominalizations concentrates on the complex event reading (e.g. La concentración de partículas tiene lugar a temperatura ambiente ‘The concentration of particles takes place at room temperature’) and the object reading (e.g. El paciente tenía concentraciones de calcio en el hombro ‘The patient had calcium concentrations in the shoulder’), while nominalizations denoting states (e.g. La concentración de Sherlock Holmes duró cinco horas ‘Sherlock Holmes’ concentration lasted five hours') have remained, in general, understudied. In this paper we present their empirical properties and argue that, despite the empirical differences, state nominalizations and event nominalizations can receive a unified account. We show that in Spanish, Catalan, French, English and German the question of whether a deverbal nominalization denotes a state or an event, or is ambiguous between both readings depends on independent properties of the verbal base, allowing us to propose a unified account of both classes of nominalizations: the productive nominalizers in these languages can only denote the aspectual notions contained in the base's Aktionsart. We further argue that other languages, like Slovenian, have productive nominalizers that can operate over the external aspect of the predicate; in these cases, the nominalization can denote aspectual notions not contained in the base's Aktionsart.


Corresponding author

Authors' addresses: (Fábregas) Humanities, Social Sciences and Education Faculty, University of Tromsø, N-9037, Tromsø,
(Marín) UMR 8163 “Savoirs, Textes, Langage” (STL), Université de Lille 3 – Bât. B4, Rue du Barreau – BP 60149, 59653 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex,


Hide All

The research underlying this article has been financed by grants Aurora Project 199749/V11 from the Norwegian Research council, ANR 07-JCJC-0085-01 from the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche and FFI2010-1506 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Education. We are grateful to Peter Svenonius, Isabelle Roy, Tom McFadden, Gillian Ramchand, Irene Franco, Annie Gagliardi, Alexander Pfaff, Lanko Marušič and three anonymous reviewers of Journal of Linguistics for data, useful comments, enlightning suggestions and enriching discussion. All disclaimers apply.

The following abbreviations are used in this paper: 3=third person; acc=accusative case marking; adj=adjectivizer; aux=auxiliary verb; gen=genitive case marking; inf=infinitive marker; nom=nominalizer; part=participle marker; pf=perfective stem; pl=plural number; pt=particle; sg=singular number; ThV=theme vowel.



Hide All
Alexiadou, Artemis, Iordăchioaia, Giannina & Soare, Elena. 2010. Number/aspect interactions in the syntax of nominalizations: A Distributed Morphology approach. Journal of Linguistics 46.3, 537574.
Arad, Maya. 2002. Universal features and language-particular morphemes. In Alexiadou, Artemis (ed.), Theoretical approaches to universals, 1540. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bach, Emmon. 1976. An extension of classical transformational grammar. In Saenz, Richard (ed.), Problems of linguistic metatheory: Proceedings of the 1976 conference, 183224. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
Beard, Robert. 1995. Lexeme–morpheme base morphology. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Borer, Hagit. 2003. Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: Syntactic projections and the lexicon. In Moore, John & Polinsky, Maria (eds.), The nature of explanation in linguistic theory, 3167. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Borer, Hagit. 2005. The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, Roderick A. & Rosenbaum, Peter S. (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 232286. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Company.
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in Generative Semantics and Montague's PTQ. Dordrecht: Reider.
Fábregas, Antonio, Marín, Rafael & McNally, Louise. In press. From psych verbs to nouns. In Demonte, Violeta & McNally, Louise (eds.), Telicity and change of state in natural languages: Implications for event structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi. 2005. Consuming results in Italian and English: Flavour of v. In Kempchinsky, Paula & Slabakova, Roumyana (eds.), Aspectual inquiries, 95–120. Dordrecht: Springer.
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel J.. 2002. Prolegomena to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subjects, events and licensing. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Harley, Heidi & Noyer, Rolf. 2000. Licensing in the non-lexicalist lexicon. In Peeters, Bert (ed.), The lexicon–encyclopaedia interface, 349374. Oxford: Elsevier.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kearns, Kate. 2003. Durative achievements and individual-level predicates on events. Linguistics and Philosophy 26.5, 595635.
Kratzer, Angelika. 2000. Building statives. Berkeley Linguistic Society (BLS) 26, 385399.
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution: Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen und Aktionsarten. München: Wilhelm Fink.
Levin, Beth & Hovav, Malka Rappaport. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax–lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levin, Beth & Hovav, Malka Rappaport. 1998. Building verb meanings. In Butt, Miriam & Geuder, Wilhelm (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, 97–134. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Levin, Beth & Hovav, Malka Rappaport. 2005. Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maienborn, Claudia. 2003. Die logische Form von Kopula-Sätzen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Maienborn, Claudia. 2005. On the limits of the Davidsonian approach: The case of copula sentences. Theoretical Linguistics 31, 275316.
Maienborn, Claudia. 2009. Building event-based ad hoc properties: On the interpretation of adjectival passives. In Riester, Arndt & Solstad, Torgrim (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 13, 3549. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart.
Marín, Rafael & Louise, McNally. 2011. Inchoativity, change of state, and telicity: Evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29.2, 467502.
Martin, Fabienne. 2009. Relative stupidity and past tenses. Ms., Universität Stuttgart.
Mourelatos, Alexander P. D. 1978. Events, processes and states. Linguistics and Philosophy 2, 415434.
Mufwene, Saliloko. 1984. Stativity and the progressive. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Padučeva, Elena Viktorovna. 1996. Semanticheskie issledovanie [Semantic investigations]. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul'tury. [Quoted after Spencer & Zaretskaya 2003.]
Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the semantics of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Picallo, Carme. 1991. Nominals and nominalizations in Catalan. Probus 3, 279316.
Pustejovsky, James. 1991. The syntax of event structure. Cognition 41, 4781.
Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rathert, Monika & Alexiadou, Artemis (eds.). 2010. The semantics of nominalizations across languages and frameworks. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Rothmayr, Antonia. 2009. The structure of stative verbs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Roßdeutscher, Antje & Kamp, Hans. 2010. Syntactic and semantic constraints in the formation and interpretation of ung-nouns. In Rathert, & Alexiadou, (eds.), 169215.
Sichel, Ivy. 2010. Event-structure constraints on nominalization. In Rathert, & Alexiadou, (eds.), 159199.
Spencer, Andrew & Zaretskaya, Marina. 2003. Stative predicates in Russian and their nominalizations. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 22, 144.
Wasow, Thomas. 1977. Transformations and the lexicon. In Culicover, Peter, Akmajian, Adrian & Wasow, Thomas (eds.), Formal syntax, 327360. New York: Academic Press.
Williams, Edwin. 2007. Dumping lexicalism. In Ramchand, Gillian & Reiss, Charles (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 353382. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed