Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T17:48:05.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tara Mohanan, Argument structure in Hindi. (Dissertations in Linguistics.) Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1994. Pp. 269.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Gillian Ramchand
Affiliation:
University of Oxford

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Shorter Notices
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bresnan, J. (1982). The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. (eds.) Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 188.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. (1965). Studies in lexical relations. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Hale, K. & Keyser, J. (1987). The view from the middle. Lexicon Project Working Papers 10. Cambridge, MA: Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1973). ‘Elsewhere’ in phonology. In Anderson, S. R. & Kiparsky, P. (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 93106.Google Scholar
Williams, E. (1994). Thematic structure in syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar