Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Vinogradov, Igor 2016. From enclitic to prefix: diachrony of personal absolutive markers in Q’eqchi’. Morphology,


    Majer, Marek 2015. Russiankotóryj, Czechkterý, Slovenekatę´ri: Vowel Variation in the Reflexes of Proto-Slavic *koterъ(jь)‘which (of the two)’. Scando-Slavica, Vol. 61, Issue. 2, p. 154.


    García-Castillero, Carlos 2013. Morphological Externalisation and the Old Irish Verbal ParticleRo1. Transactions of the Philological Society, Vol. 111, Issue. 1, p. 108.


    Gaeta, Livio 2008. Constituent order in compounds and syntax: typology and diachrony. Morphology, Vol. 18, Issue. 2, p. 117.


    ×

Trapped morphology

  • ALICE C. HARRIS (a1) and JAN TERJE FAARLUND (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022226706003902
  • Published online: 01 June 2006
Abstract

We argue that there is a diachronic process, distinct from phonological erosion, that results in the loss of inflectional morphology that is trapped when a clitic attaches to a host, becoming an affix. This is supported with attested examples from Mainland Scandinavian, Georgian, Spanish, and Greek, as well as shallow, well-accepted reconstructions from Slavic and Georgian. It is further supported by new reconstructions from Zoque (Mixe-Zoquean) and Andi (Northeast Caucasian). For example, in Old Norse the postposed article is a clitic, and there is a case ending between the noun stem and the article: hest-s=in-s ‘the horse (gen)’. The first s is trapped morphology, and it is subsequently lost: hest-en-s. Similarly, in pre-Georgian, the postposed article traps the ergative case marker, *-n: *k'ac-n=ma-n ‘the man (erg)’; it is subsequently lost: k'ac-man. We argue that the loss of trapped morphology is not sound change or another phonological process, but a morphological process.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Department of Linguistics, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-4376, U.S.A. E-mail: alice.harris@stonybrook.edu
Institutt for lingvistiske og nordiske studium, Postboks 1102, Blindern, NO-0317 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: j.t.faarlund@iln.uio.no
Footnotes
Hide All
The research reported here was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number BCS-0215523 (ACH) and by the Centre for Advanced Study in Oslo in 2005 (both authors). We are grateful to our colleagues at the Centre for Advanced Study for their comments, especially to Henning Andersen for help with the Slavic data. We also appreciate comments and challenges from members of the audience at the workshop Weak Words: Their Origin and Progress, held in Konstanz in April 2005, where an earlier version of this paper was presented. We would also like to thank Brian Joseph for discussion of the Greek data.
Footnotes
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×