Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Word-based morphology

  • JAMES P. BLEVINS (a1)
Abstract

This paper examines two contrasting perspectives on morphological analysis, and considers inflectional patterns that bear on the choice between these alternatives. On what is termed an ABSTRACTIVE perspective, surface word forms are regarded as basic morphotactic units of a grammatical system, with roots, stems and exponents treated as abstractions over a lexicon of word forms. This traditional standpoint is contrasted with the more CONSTRUCTIVE perspective of post-Bloomfieldian models, in which surface word forms are ‘built’ from sub-word units. Part of the interest of this contrast is that it cuts across conventional divisions of morphological models. Thus, realization-based models are morphosyntactically ‘word-based’ in the sense that they regard words as the minimal meaningful units of a grammatical system. Yet morphotactically, these models tend to adopt a constructive ‘root-based’ or ‘stem-based’ perspective. An examination of some form-class patterns in Saami, Estonian and Georgian highlights advantages of an abstractive model, and suggests that these advantages derive from the fact that sets of words often predict other word forms and determine a morphotactic analysis of their parts, whereas sets of sub-word units are of limited predictive value and typically do not provide enough information to recover word forms.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Research Centre for English and Applied Linguistics, University of Cambridge, Faculty of English Building, 9 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DP, U.K. E-mail: jpb@jpblevins.com
Footnotes
Hide All
I would like to thank Farrell Ackerman, Emmon Bach, Juliette Blevins, Andrew Garrett, Alice Harris, James Kirby, Andrew Spencer and audiences at the University of York and at the University of Leipzig for comments, discussion and feedback on earlier versions of this paper. I am also grateful to the JL editors, Orin Gensler and two anonymous JL reviewers for suggestions and criticisms that have led to improvements in the current version.
Footnotes
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed