Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-31T16:14:09.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epitaxial cerium oxide buffer layers and YBa2Cu3O7−δ thin films for microwave device applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Sissel N. Jacobsen ,
Lynnette D. Madsen  and
Ulf Helmersson
Sissel N. Jacobsen
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, Sweden
Lynnette D. Madsen
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, Sweden
Ulf Helmersson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

CeO2 films with thicknesses ranging from 8.8 to 199 nm were grown on Al2O3 (1102) (R-cut) substrates by off-axis rf magnetron sputtering. X-ray diffraction showed an epitaxial relationship with the CeO2 (001) planes parallel to the Al2O3 (1102) planes for all film thicknesses. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) revealed a rough surface morphology consisting of crystallites with lateral dimensions of 10–90 nm. In the thinnest film, these crystallites were regularly shaped and uniformly distributed on the substrate, while they were rectangularly shaped and oriented mainly in two directions, orthogonal to each other, in the thicker films. The surface roughness of the films increased with increasing layer thickness. Characterization of the microstructure was done by cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (XTEM) and showed a polycrystalline, highly oriented, columnar structure with a top layer terminated by (111)-facets. High-quality YBa2Cu3O7−δ (YBCO) thin films were deposited directly onto the CeO2 layers. XTEM, rather surprisingly, showed a smooth interface between the YBCO and CeO2 layer. Postdeposition ex situ annealing was carried out on two CeO2 films and evaluated by AFM. Upon annealing samples at 930 °C, a relatively smooth morphology without facets was obtained. Annealing films at 800 °C caused no appreciable change in surface morphology, whereas igniting a YBCO plasma during a similar anneal clearly altered the sample surface, giving facets that were rounded.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 14 , Issue 6 , June 1999 , pp. 2385 - 2393
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.Rudner, S., Wernlund, L-D., Hagelin, S. L., Johnson, C.N.L, Jacobsen, S. N., and Helmersson, U., Proc. 8th CIMTEC–World Ceramics Congress & Forum on New Materials, Florence, Italy, June 29–July 4 (1994).Google Scholar
2.Denlinger, E., Paglione, R., Kalokitis, D., Belohoubek, E., Pique, A., Wu, X. D., Venkatesan, T., Fathy, A., Pendrick, V., Green, S., and Mathews, S., IEEE Microwave Guided Wave Lett. 2, 449 (1992).Google Scholar
3.Cole, B. F., Liang, G-C., Newman, N., Char, K., Zaharchul, G., and Martens, J. S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 1727 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Liang, G-C., Withers, R.S., Cole, B.F., and Newman, N., IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 42, 34 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Vendik, I. B., Vendik, O. G., Sitnikova, M. F., Olsson, E., and Gevorgian, S. S., Int. J. Microwave Millimeter-Wave Computer-Aided Eng. 4, 374 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Young, R. T., Young, K. H., Muller, M. D., Ovshinsky, S. R., Budai, J. D., White, C. W., and Martens, J. S., Physica C 200, 437 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Wu, X. D., Foltyn, S. R., Muenchausen, R. E., Cooke, D. W., Piqué, A., Kalokitis, D., Pendrick, V., and Belohoubeck, E., J. Supercond. 5, 353 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Merchant, P., Jacowitz, R. D., Tibbs, K., Taber, R. G., and Laderman, S. S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 763 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Denhoff, M. W. and McCaffrey, J.P., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 3986 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Wu, X.D. and Muenchausen, R.E., Mod. Phys. Lett. 5, 1267 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Johnson, C. N. L., Helmersson, U., Madsen, L.D., Rudner, S., and Wernlund, L-D., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 6388 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Selinder, T.I., Helmersson, U., Han, Z., and Wallenberg, L. R., Thin Solid Films 229, 237 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Weaver, L., Microsc. Res. Technol. 36, 368 (1997).3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.McCaffrey, J. P., Microsc. Res. Technol. 24, 180 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Schowalter, L.J. and Fathauer, R. W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 4, 1026 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Adibi, F., Petrov, I., Hultman, L., Wahlström, U., Shimizu, T., McIntyre, D., Green, J. E., and Sundgren, J-E., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 5369 (1995).Google Scholar
17.Greene, J. E., in Handbook of Crystal Growth, edited by Hurle, D.J. T. (Elsevier Sci., Amsterdam, 1993), Vol. 1, p. 640.Google Scholar
18.Tasker, P.W., J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 121, 4977 (1979).Google Scholar
19.Sayle, T.X. T., Parker, S.C., and Catlow, C. R. A., Surf. Sci. 316, 329 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Wang, F. and Wördernweber, R., Thin Solid Films 227, 200 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Shannon, R.D., Acta Crystallogr. A 32, 751 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar