Hostname: page-component-758b78586c-72lk7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-11-28T15:50:34.901Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Mechanical performance and fracture behavior of Fe41Co7Cr15Mo14Y2C15B6 bulk metallic glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Q.J. Chen
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, People’s Republic of China; and Department of Materials and Process Engineering, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
J. Shen*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, People’s Republic of China
D.L. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials and Process Engineering, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
H.B. Fan
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, People’s Republic of China
J.F. Sun
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, People’s Republic of China
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: junshen@hit.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

The mechanical properties of a new Fe41Co7Cr15Mo14Y2C15B6 bulk glassy alloy were studied by impact bending, compression, and hardness tests carried out at room temperature. The compressive fracture strength, elastic strain to fracture, Young’s modulus and Vickers hardness were measured to be 3.5 GPa, 1.5%, 265 GPa, and 1253 kg mm−2, respectively. The fracture mode of the glassy alloy under uniaxial compression is different from those of other bulk metallic glasses in that this fracture mode causes the samples to be broken, in an exploding manner, into a large number of micrometer-scale pieces. The fracture mechanisms of this bulk glassy alloy under bending and uniaxial compression are discussed based on the observation of the fracture surfaces. Vickers indentation tests indicate that the structure of the glassy ingot may be inhomogeneous.

Keywords

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Zhang, W. and Inoue, A.: Cu-based bulk glass formation in the Cu–Zr–Ga alloy system and their mechanical properties. Mater. Trans. 45, 532 (2004).Google Scholar
2Wesseling, P., Nieh, T.G., Wang, W.H., and Lewandowski, J.J.: Preliminary assessment of flow, notch toughness, and high temperature behavior of Cu60Zr20Hf10Ti10 bulk metallic glass. Scripta Mater. 51, 151 (2004).Google Scholar
3Calin, M., Echert, J., and Schultz, L.: Improved mechanical behavior of Cu–Ti-based bulk metallic glass by in situ formation of nanoscale precipitates. Scripta Mater. 63, 653 (2003).Google Scholar
4Zhang, Z.F., Echert, J., and Schultz, L.: Difference in compressive and tensile fracture mechanisms of Zr59Cu20Al10Ni8Ti3 bulk metallic glass. Acta Mater. 51, 1167 (2003).Google Scholar
5Gilbert, C.J., Ritchie, R.O., and Johnson, W.L.: Fracture toughness and fatigue-crack propagation in a Zr–Ti–Ni–Cu–Be bulk metallic glass. Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 476 (1997).Google Scholar
6Zhang, Z.F., Echert, J., and Schultz, L.: Tensile and fatigue fracture mechanisms of a Zr-based bulk metallic glass. J. Mater. Res. 18, 456 (2003).Google Scholar
7Ma, C.L. and Inoue, A.: Deformation and fracture behaviors of Pd–Cu–Ni–P glassy alloys. Mater. Trans. 43, 3266 (2002).Google Scholar
8Mukai, T., Nieh, T.G., Kawamura, Y., Inoue, A., and Higashi, K.: Effect of strain rate on compressive behavior of a Pd40Ni40P20 bulk metallic glass. Intermetallics 10, 1071 (2002).Google Scholar
9Ponnambalam, V., Poon, S.J., and Shiflet, G.J.: Fe-based bulk metallic glasses with diameter thickness larger than one centimeter. J. Mater. Res. 19, 1320 (2004).Google Scholar
10Lu, Z.P., Liu, C.T., Thompson, J.R., and Porter, W.D.: Structure amorphous steels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 245503-1 (2004).Google Scholar
11Shen, J., Chen, Q.J., Sun, J.F., Fan, H.B., and Wang, G.: Exceptionally high glass-forming ability of FeCoCrMoCBY alloys. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 151907-1 (2005).Google Scholar
12Chen, Q.J., Fan, H.B., Ye, L., Ringer, S., Sun, J.F., Shen, J., and McCartney, D.G.: Enhanced glass forming ability of Fe–Co–Zr– Mo–W–B alloys with Ni addition. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 402, 188 (2005).Google Scholar
13Inoue, A., Shen, B.L., Yavari, A.R., and Greer, A.L.: Mechanical properties of Fe-based bulk glassy alloys in Fe–B–Si–Nb and Fe–Ga–P–C–B–Si systems. J. Mater. Res. 18, 1487 (2003).Google Scholar
14Das, J., Tang, M.B., Kim, K.B., Theissmann, R., Baier, F., Wang, W.H., and Eckert, J.: “Work-hardenable” ductile bulk metallic glass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 205501-1 (2005).Google Scholar
15Schroers, J. and Johnson, W.L.: Ductile bulk metallic glasses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 255506-1 (2004).Google Scholar
16Inoue, A., Zhang, W., Zhang, T., and Kurosaka, K.: High-strength Cu-based bulk glassy alloys in CuZrTi and CuHfTi ternary systems. Acta Mater. 49, 2645 (2001).Google Scholar
17Xi, X.K., Zhao, D.Q., Pan, M.X., Wang, W.H., Wu, Y., and Lewandowski, J.J.: Fracture of brittle metallic glasses: Brittleness or plasticity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 125510 (2005).Google Scholar
18Guo, F.Q., Poon, P.J., and Shiflet, G.J.: Metallic glass ingots based on yttrium. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 2575 (2003).Google Scholar
19Schuh, C.A. and Nieh, T.G.: A nanoindentation study of serrated flow in bulk metallic glasses. Acta Mater. 51, 87 (2003).Google Scholar
20Stoica, M., Echert, J., Roth, S., Zhang, Z.F., Schultz, L., and Wang, W.H.: Mechanical behavior of Fe65.5Cr4Mo4Ga4P12C5B5.5 bulk metallic glass. Intermetallics 13, 764 (2005).Google Scholar
21Wole, S.: Mechanical Properties of Engineered Material (Marcel Dekker New York, 2002), pp. 389, 391.Google Scholar