Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T13:43:06.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phase transition behaviors of BaTiO3–BaZrO3 solid solutions under high direct current bias fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

S. Wada ,
H. Adachi ,
H. Kakemoto ,
H. Chazono ,
Y. Mizuno ,
H. Kishi  and
T. Tsurumi
S. Wada*
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Ceramics Science, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2–12–1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152–8552, Japan
H. Adachi
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Ceramics Science, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2–12–1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152–8552, Japan
H. Kakemoto
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Ceramics Science, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2–12–1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152–8552, Japan
H. Chazono
Affiliation:
General R & Laboratories, Taiyo Yuden Co., Ltd., 5607–2 Nakamuroda, Haruna-machi, Gunma 370–3347, Japan
Y. Mizuno
Affiliation:
General R & Laboratories, Taiyo Yuden Co., Ltd., 5607–2 Nakamuroda, Haruna-machi, Gunma 370–3347, Japan
H. Kishi
Affiliation:
General R & Laboratories, Taiyo Yuden Co., Ltd., 5607–2 Nakamuroda, Haruna-machi, Gunma 370–3347, Japan
T. Tsurumi
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Ceramics Science, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2–12–1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152–8552, Japan
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: swada@ceram.titech.ac.jp
Get access

Abstract

The dielectric properties of the Ba(Ti1–xZrx)O3 (BT1–xZx) ceramics with various compositions were investigated under various DC bias fields. In BT0.94Z0.06 ceramics, the dielectric constants (ε) vs temperature (T) curves without DC bias showed no frequency dependence. Its DC bias dependence exhibited that with increasing DC bias fields, the dielectric constants were suppressed while phase transition peaks slightly shifted to high temperature. In BT0.58Z0.42 ceramics, the ε vs T curves without DC bias showed a broad peak with a clear frequency dependence, which revealed that BT0.58Z0.42 ceramics were the relaxor. Its DC bias dependence exhibited that with increasing DC bias fields, the dielectric constants were suppressed while the phase transition peak largely shifted to low temperatures. In BT0.79Z0.21 ceramics, the ε vs T curves without DC bias showed a broad peak without frequency dependence. Its DC bias dependence revealed that the dielectric peak shifted to high temperature and broadened with increasing DC bias. To explain the above phenomena, it was considered that the role of Zr ions on BT1−xZx ceramics is to make the depth of the potential well shallow successively.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , February 2002 , pp. 456 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.Hennings, D., Schnell, A., and Simon, G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 65, 539 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Neirman, S.M., J. Mater. Sci. 23, 3973 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Armstrong, T.R., Morgens, L.E., Maurice, A.K., and Buchanan, R.C., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 605 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Toyoda, K., Takano, F., Kato, T., and Sakabe, Y., Ferroelectrics 93, 335 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Sumita, S., Ikeda, M., Nakano, Y., Nishiyama, K., and Nomura, T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 2739 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Shizuno, H., Kusumi, S., Saito, H., and Kishi, H., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 4380 (1993).Google Scholar
7.Toda, K., J. Appl. Phys. 43, 261 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Rehrig, P.W., Park, S-E., Trolier-McKinstry, S., and Messing, G.L., J. Appl. Phys. 86, 1657 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Yu, Z., Guo, R., and Bhalla, A.S., J. Appl. Phys. 88, 410 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. McQuarrie, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 37, 539 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. N.S. Novosil’tsev and Khodakov, A.L., Sov. Phys.-Tech. Phys. 1, 306 (1956).Google Scholar
12.Kell, R.C. and Helicar, N.J., Acustica 6, 235 (1956).Google Scholar
13.Bokov, V.A., Sov. Phys.-Tech. Phys. 2, 1639 (1957); V.A. Bokov, Sov. Phys.-Tech. Phys. 3, 70 (1958).Google Scholar
14.Verbitskaia, T.N., Zhdanov, G.S., Iu.N. Venevtsev, and Soloviev, S.P., Sov. Phys. Crystallogr. 3, 182 (1958).Google Scholar
15.Polandov, I.N., Sov. Phys. Solid State 7, 1508 (1965).Google Scholar
16.Jaffe, B., Cook, W.R., and Jaffe, H., Piezoelectric Ceramics (Academic Press, New York, 1971).Google Scholar
17.Hennings, D. and Schreinemacher, H., Mater. Res. Bull. 12, 1221 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Ravez, J. and Simon, A., Eur. J. Solid State Inorg. Chem. 34, 1199 (1997).Google Scholar
19.Ravez, J. and Simon, A., J. Korean Phys. Soc. 32, S955 (1998).Google Scholar
20.Farhi, R., Marssi, M. El, Simon, A., and Ravez, J., Eur. Phys. J. B9, 599 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Tsurumi, T., Yamamoto, Y., Kakemoto, H., Wada, S., Chazono, H., and Kishi, H., J. Mater. Res. (in press).Google Scholar
22.Kay, H.F. and Vousden, P., Philos. Mag. 40, 1019 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Cross, L.E., Ferroelectrics 76, 241 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Randall, C.A. and Bhalla, A.S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 29, 327 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Kighelman, Z., Damjanovic, D., Seifert, A., Hiboux, S., Sagalowicz, L., and Setter, N., Integr. Ferroelectr. 25, 125 (1999).Google Scholar
26.Faniel, V.V., Dielectric relaxation (Academic Press, London, U.K., 1967), pp. 19–27.Google Scholar
27.Debye, P., Polar Molecules (Dover Publications, New York, 1945).Google Scholar