Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Analysis of nanoindentation load-displacement loading curves

  • S. V. Hainsworth (a1), H. W. Chandler (a1) and T. F. Page (a1)

Abstract

Nanoindentation load-displacement curves provide a “mechanical fingerprint” of a materials response to contact deformation. Over the last few years, much attention has been focused on understanding the factors controlling the detailed shape of unloading curves so that parameters such as true contact area, Young's modulus, and an indentation hardness number can be derived. When the unloading curve is well behaved (by which we mean approximating to linear behavior, or alternatively, fitting a power-law relationship), then this approach can be very successful. However, when the test volume displays considerable elastic recovery as the load is removed [e.g., for many stiff hard materials and many inhomogeneous systems (e.g., those employing thin hard coatings)], then the unloading curve fits no existing model particularly well. This results in considerable difficulty in obtaining valid mechanical property data for these types of materials. An alternative approach, described here, is to attempt to understand the shapes of nanoindentation loading curve and thus quantitatively model the relationship between Young's modulus, indentation hardness, indenter geometry, and the resultant maximum displacement for a given load. This paper describes the development and refinement of a previous approach by Loubet et al1 originally suggested for a Vickers indenter, but applied here to understand the factors that control the shape of the loading curve during nanoindentation experiments with a pointed, trigonal (Berkovich) indenter. For a range of materials, the relationship P = Kmδ2 was found to describe the indenter displacement, δ, in terms of the applied load P. For each material, Km can be predicted from the Young's modulus (E) and the hardness (H). The result is that if either E or H is known, then the other may be calculated from the experimental loading curve. This approach provides an attractive alternative to finite element modeling and is a tractable approach for those cases where analysis of unloading curves is infeasible.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1.Loubet, J. L., Georges, J.M., and Meille, J., in Microindentation Techniques in Materials Science and Engineering, edited by Blau, P. J. and Lawn, B. R. (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia 1986), pp. 7289.
2.Page, T.F. and Hainsworth, S.V., Surf. Coatings Technol. 68/69, 571575 (1994).
3.McGurk, M. R., Chandler, H. W., Twigg, P. C., and Page, T. F., Surf. Coatings Technol. 68/69, 576581 (1994).
4.Doerner, M. F. and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 601609 (1986).
5.Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G. M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 15641583 (1992).
6.Pharr, G. M., Tsui, T. Y., Bolshakov, A., and Oliver, W. C., in Materials Reliability in Microelectronics IV, edited by Børgesen, P., Coburn, J. C., Sanchez, J. E. Jr., and Rodbell, K. P., and Filter, W. F. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 338, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994), pp. 127134.
7.Swain, M. V. and Menčík, J., Thin Solid Films 253, 204211 (1994).
8.Hainsworth, S. V., Whitehead, A. J., and Page, T. F., in Plastic Deformation of Ceramics, edited by Bradt, R. C., Brookes, C. A., and Routbort, J.L., Proc. Int. Conf. Snowbird, Utah, August 7–12, 1994 (Plenum Publ. Corp., New York, 1995), pp. 173184.
9.Page, T. F., Oliver, W. C., and McHargue, C. J., J. Mater. Res. 7, 450472 (1992).
10.Hainsworth, S. V. and Page, T. F., J. Mater. Sci. 29, 55295540 (1994).
11.Sargent, P. M. and Page, T. F., Proc. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 26, 209224 (1978).
12.Bull, S. J., Page, T. F., and Yoffe, E. H., Phil. Mag. Lett. 59, 281288 (1989).
13.Hainsworth, S. V., Chandler, H. W., and Page, T. F., unpublished.
14.Hainsworth, S. V., and Page, T. F., in Thin films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties VI, edited by Gerberich, W. W., Sundgren, J-E., Gao, H., and Baker, S. P. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1996), in press.
15.Greenwood, J. A. and Williamson, J.B. P., Proc. Roy. Soc. London A295, 300319 (1966).
16.Sjöström, H., Hultman, L., Sundgren, J-E., Hainsworth, S. V., Page, T. F., and Theunissen, G. S. A. M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. in J Vac Sci Technol. A. 14, 17 (1996).
17.Field, J. S. and Swain, M. V., J. Mater. Res. 8, 297306 (1993).

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed