Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T07:33:10.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brittle fracture and grain boundary chemistry of microalloyed NiAl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

E. P. George  and
C. T. Liu
E. P. George
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6093
C. T. Liu
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6093
Get access

Abstract

The room-temperature tensile properties, fracture mode, and grain boundary chemistry of undoped stoichiometric NiAl, as well as NiAl doped with boron, carbon, and beryllium, have been investigated, Pure, stoichiometric NiAl fractures with limited tensile ductility in a predominantly intergranular manner. Auger analyses revealed that the grain boundaries in NiAl are extremely clean and free of any segregated impurities, indicating that they are intrinsically brittle. Boron, when added to stoichiometric NiAl at a bulk level of 300 wt. ppm, segregates to the grain boundaries and suppresses intergranular fracture. However, there is no attendant improvement in tensile ductility because boron is an extremely potent solid solution strengthener in NiAl, more than doubling its yield strength. As a result, any potential benefit of improving grain boundary strength is more than offset by the increase in yield strength. Unlike boron, both carbon (300 ppm) and beryllium (500 ppm) are ineffective in suppressing intergranular fracture in NiAl, and Auger analyses of the C-doped alloy revealed that carbon did not affect the fracture mode because it did not segregate to the grain boundaries. Although neither beryllium nor carbon suppressed grain boundary fracture, their effects on the tensile ductility of NiAl were quite different: the ductility of the Be-doped alloy was higher than that of the B-doped alloy because beryllium, unlike boron, has a rather modest strengthening effect in NiAl, whereas the C-doped alloy was brittle like the B-doped alloy, because carbon is a potent solid solution strengthener, just like boron. These observations were rationalized by considering a hard-sphere model for interstitial and substitutional sites in NiAl. It was concluded that boron and carbon occupy interstitial sites, whereas beryllium dissolves substitutionally. In all the alloys that were investigated, the Ni and Al contents of the grain boundaries were not significantly different from the bulk levels, and no evidence was found for B–Ni cosegregation.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , April 1990 , pp. 754 - 762
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Hahn, K. H. and Vedula, K., Scripta Metall. 23, 7 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Rozner, A. G. and Wasilewski, R. J., J. Inst. Met. 94, 169 (1966).Google Scholar
3Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, edited by Massalski, T. B., Murray, J. L., Bennett, L. H., and Baker, H. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1986).Google Scholar
4Westbrook, J. H., J. Electrochem. Soc. 103, 54 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Ball, A. and Smallman, R. E., Acta Metall. 14, 1349 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Pascoe, R.T. and Newey, C.W. A., Met. Sci. J. 2, 138 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Seah, M.P., Surf. Sci. 53, 168 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8McMahon, C. J., Jr., Mater. Sci. Eng. 25, 233 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9McLean, D., J. Inst. Met. 81, 121 (1952–53).Google Scholar
10Joshi, A. and Stein, D. F., J. Inst. Met. 99, 178 (1971).Google Scholar
11White, C. L. and Stein, D. F., Metall. Trans. A 9A, 13 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Liu, C.T., White, C.L., and Horton, J.A., Acta Metall. 33, 213 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Takasugi, T., George, E. P., Pope, D.P., and Izumi, O., Scripta Metall. 19, 551 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Ogura, T., Hanada, S., Masumoto, T., and Izumi, O., Metall. Trans. A 16A, 441 (1985).Google Scholar
15Oliver, W. C. and White, C. L., in High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys II (Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp.), edited by Stoloff, N. S., Koch, C. C., Liu, C.T., and Izumi, O. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987), Vol. 81, p. 241.Google Scholar
16Hecker, S. S., Rohr, D. L., and Stein, D. F., Metall. Trans. A 9A, 481 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17White, C. L., Clausing, R. E., and Heatherly, L., Metall. Trans. A 10A, 683 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Aoki, K. and Izumi, O., J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 43, 1190 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Painter, G.S. and Averill, F.W., Phys. Rev. B 39, 7522 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Takasugi, T., Masahashi, N., and Izumi, O., Scripta Metall. 20, 1317 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Choudhury, A., Ph. D. Thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 1987.Google Scholar
22Kuruvilla, A. K. and Stoloff, N. S., in High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys (Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp.), edited by Koch, C. C., Liu, C.T., and Stoloff, N. S (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985), Vol. 39, p. 229.Google Scholar
23Choudhury, A., White, C. L., and Brooks, C. R., Scripta Metall. 20, 1061 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24George, E. P., Liu, C.T., and Padgett, R. A., Scripta Metall. 23, 979 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Kocks, U. F. and Westlake, D. G., Trans. Amer. Inst. Min. Engrs. 239, 1107 (1967).Google Scholar
26Schulson, E.M. and Barker, D.R., Scripta Metall. 17, 519 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Crimp, M. A. and Vedula, K., J. Mater. Sci. 78, 193 (1986).Google Scholar
28Liu, C.T., in Proc. ASM Materials Science Seminar: Science of Advanced Materials (to be published).Google Scholar
29Liu, C.T., Lee, E. H., and McKamey, C. D., Scripta Metall. 23, 875 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Masahashi, N., Takasugi, T., and Izumi, O., Acta Metall. 36, 1815 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Villars, P. and Calvert, L. D., Pearson's Handbook of Crystallographic Data for Intermetallic Phases (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1985), Vol. 2.Google Scholar
32Lamparter, P., Sperl, W., Steeb, S., and Blétry, J., Z. Naturforsch. 37a, 1223 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Laves, F., in Theory of Alloy Phases (American Society for Metals, Cleveland, OH, 1956), p. 124.Google Scholar
34King, H.W., in Physical Metallurgy, edited by Cahn, R.W. (North-Holland, Amsterdam-London, 1970), p. 33.Google Scholar
35Liu, C.T., in Interfacial Structure, Properties and Design (Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp.), edited by Yoo, M. H., Clark, W.A.T., and Briant, C. L. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988), Vol. 122, p. 429.Google Scholar
36Liu, C.T., unpublished results (1989).Google Scholar
37Masahashi, N., Takasugi, T., and Izumi, O., Acta Metall. 36, 1823 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Guha, Sumit, Munroe, Paul, and Baker, Ian, Scripta Metall. 23, 897 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Kruisman, J. J., Vitek, V., and De Hosson, J.Th. M., Acta Metall. 36, 2729 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Vitek, V., Chen, S. P., Voter, A. F., Kruisman, J. J., and De Hosson, J. Th. M., in Grain Boundary Chemistry and Intergranular Fracture, edited by Was, G.S. (Trans. Tech. Publications, 1989).Google Scholar
41King, A. H. and Yoo, M. H., in High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys II (Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp.), edited by Stoloff, N. S., Koch, C. C., Liu, C.T., and Izumi, O. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987), Vol. 81, p. 99.Google Scholar
42Davis, L. E., MacDonald, N. C., Palmberg, P.W., Riach, G. E., and Weber, R. E., Handbook of Auger Electron Spectroscopy (Physical Electronics Industries, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN, 1976).Google Scholar
43Camus, P.P., Baker, I., Horton, J.A., and Miller, M.K., J. de Physique (to be published).Google Scholar
44Chen, S. P., Voter, A. F., Boring, A. M., Albers, R. C., and Hay, P. J., in High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys III (Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp.), edited by Liu, C.T., Taub, A.I., Stoloff, N. S., and Koch, C. C. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989), Vol. 133, p. 149.Google Scholar