Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T12:12:04.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crystallinity of Y1Ba2Cu3O7−x films grown on MgO by activated reactive evaporation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Shiva Prakash  and
R.F. Bunshah
Shiva Prakash
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024
R.F. Bunshah
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024
Get access

Abstract

The film crystallinity and nature of the interface between Y1Ba2Cu3O7−x (YBCO) films and (100)-oriented MgO substrates are revealed using results from x-ray line broadening analysis, x-ray pole figure analysis, and simple models for interface types. The superconductor film was grown using Activated Reactive Evaporation (ARE) at 675 °C. The results show that the interface can be treated as semicoherent with interfacial dislocations whose spacing depends on the in-plane orientation relationship between YBCO and MgO. For the orientation relationship (100) YBCO parallel to (100) MgO, the spacings between dislocations are 9 lattice spacings of MgO in the a direction and 11 lattice spacings of MgO in the b direction. For the orientation relationship (110) YBCO parallel to (100) MgO, the spacing between dislocations is 2 lattice spacings of MgO (or 4 plane spacings of (200) MgO—see Ref. 10). The x-ray based method used here can be an addition to or a replacement for the cumbersome cross-sectional TEM technique (for the YBCO system) to view the interface.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 7 , Issue 9 , September 1992 , pp. 2343 - 2348
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Jackson, C. M., Hu, R., Daly, K. P., Takemoto, J. H., Burch, J. F., and Simon, R. W., J. Superconductivity 3 (3) (1990).Google Scholar
2.Bybokas, Jim and Hammond, Bob, Microwave J. Feb. (1990).Google Scholar
3.Sheppard, L.M., Ceram. Bull. 70 (9) (1991).Google Scholar
4.Withers, R.S., Anderson, A. C., and Oates, D. E., Solid State Technol. August (1990).Google Scholar
5.Zhang, D., Fetterman, H., Prakash, S., and Bunshah, R.F., MTT Trans. 39 (9) (1991).Google Scholar
6.Zhang, D., Fetterman, H., Prakash, S., and Bunshah, R. F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58 (14) (April 1991).Google Scholar
7.Prakash, S., Chou, K., and Bunshah, R.F., Superconductor Sci. Technol. 3, 543 (1990).Google Scholar
8.Terashima, T., Iijima, K., Yamamoto, K., Bando, Y., and Mazaki, H., Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 27, L91 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Prakash, S., Chou, K., and Bunshah, R. F., accepted for publication, Thin Solid Films (1991).Google Scholar
10.Ramesh, R., Hwang, D., Ravi, T. S., Inam, A., Barner, J. B., Nazar, L., Chan, S. W., Chen, C. Y., Dutta, B., Venkatesan, T., and Wu, X. D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56 (22) (1990).Google Scholar
11.Ceramic Source (Am. Ceram. Soc, Westerville, OH, 1988), Vol. 4.Google Scholar
12.Cullity, B.D., Elements of X-ray Diffraction, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., New York, 1978), p. 284.Google Scholar