Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:56:39.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Digital simulation of the aggregate–cement paste interfacial zone in concrete

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Edward J. Garboczi
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Building Materials Division, 226/B348, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Dale P. Bentz
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Building Materials Division, 226/B348, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Get access

Abstract

Researchers using backscattered scanning electron microscopy, along with quantitative image analysis techniques, have clearly demonstrated the existence of a highly porous interfacial region between aggregate particles and the cement paste matrix in ordinary Portland cement concrete. This paper presents the results of a digital-image-based simulation model of this interfacial zone. A dissolution-diffusion-reaction-like cycle of hydrating cement particles is directly simulated using cement particles packed around a simple nonreactive aggregate particle. The model is two-dimensional, as we are comparing to experimental results obtained on two-dimensional images of polished sections. The qualitative features seen experimentally, such as large amounts of porosity and calcium hydroxide in the interfacial zone, are accurately reproduced. A new mechanism, one-sided growth, is proposed, along with the more usual particle-packing ideas, as an explanation of the origin of the characteristic features of the interfacial zone.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Witten, T. A. and Sander, L. M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1400 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meakin, P., in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by Domb, C. and Leibowitz, J. L. (Academic Press, New York, 1988), Vol. 12.Google Scholar
2Kolb, M., Botet, R., and Jullien, R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1123 (1983).Google Scholar
3Eden, M., in Proc. 4th Berkeley Symp. on Mathematical Statistics a nd Probability, edited by Neyman, Jerzy (Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1961), Vol. IV.Google Scholar
4Barnes, B. D., Diamond, S., and Dolch, W. L., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 62, 21 (1979).Google Scholar
5Scrivener, Karen L., in Materials Science of Concrete, edited by Skalny, Jan (American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1989), Vol. I, pp. 127161.Google Scholar
6Uchikawa, Hiroshi, J. of Research of the Onoda Cement Co. 40 (119) (1988).Google Scholar
7Zimbelmann, R., Cem. and Cone. Res. 15, 801 (1985).Google Scholar
8Jennings, Hamlin M. and Johnson, Steven K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69, 790 (1986).Google Scholar
9 Douglas Cooper, W., Phys. Rev. A 38, 522 (1988).Google Scholar
10Young, J. F. and Hansen, W., in Microstructural Development During Hydration of Cement, edited by Struble, L. J. and Brown, P. W. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987).Google Scholar
11Jennings, H. M. and Parrott, L. J., J. Mater. Sci. 21, 4053 (1986).Google Scholar
12Bentz, D. P. and Garboczi, E. J., Cem. and Cone. Res. (in press).Google Scholar
13Bentz, D. P., Gingold, D. B., Garboczi, E. J., Lobb, C. J., and Jennings, H. M., in Proc. NIST/ACerS Conference on Advances in Cementitious Materials (American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1991, in press).Google Scholar