Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T01:45:40.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The dynamic recrystallization evolution and kinetics of Ni–18.3Cr–6.4Co–5.9W–4Mo–2.19Al–1.16Ti superalloy during hot deformation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2015

Hongbin Zhang*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, People's Republic of China
Kaifeng Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, People's Republic of China
Shaosong Jiang
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, People's Republic of China
Zhen Lu
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, People's Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: 1986_wawq@163.com
Get access

Abstract

The dynamic recrystallization (DRX) behavior of Ni–18.3Cr–6.4Co–5.9W–4Mo–2.19Al–1.16Ti superalloy was investigated by means of isothermal compression tests in the temperature range of 1010–1160 °C and strain rate range of 0.001–1 s−1. It was found that the nucleation mechanisms of discontinuous DRX and continuous DRX (CDRX) occurred simultaneously during hot deformation, and twinning can play an important role in improving the process of DRX. There are three stages in the process of CDRX, i.e., the accumulation and rearrangement of dislocations, the formation of subgrain boundary, and the conversion to high angle grain boundaries (HAGBs) from subgrain boundary. Moreover, the effect of CDRX grows weaker with increasing deformation temperature and decreasing strain rate. Additionally, both the volume fraction of DRX grains and the DRX grain size were closely related to the deformation temperature and strain rate, and a power exponent relationship between the DRX grain size and Z parameter was obtained. Based on the experimental data, the kinetic equations were also developed to evaluate the volume fraction of DRX grains during hot deformation in the alloy.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Lin, Y. and Chen, X-M.: A critical review of experimental results and constitutive descriptions for metals and alloys in hot working. Mater. Des. 32(4), 1733 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H., Zhang, K., Lu, Z., Zhao, C., and Yang, X.: Hot deformation behavior and processing map of a γ′-hardened nickel-based superalloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 604, 1 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Momeni, A., Kazemi, S., and Bahrani, A.: Hot deformation behavior of microstructural constituents in a duplex stainless steel during high-temperature straining. Int. J. Min. Met. Mater. 20(10), 953 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y., Chen, M-S., and Zhong, J.: Effect of temperature and strain rate on the compressive deformation behavior of 42CrMo steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 205(1), 308 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandal, S., Bhaduri, A., and Sarma, V.S.: A study on microstructural evolution and dynamic recrystallization during isothermal deformation of a Ti-modified austenitic stainless steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 42(4), 1062 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H., Zhang, K., Jiang, S., Zhou, H., Zhao, C., and Yang, X.: Dynamic recrystallization behavior of a γ′-hardened nickel-based superalloy during hot deformation. J. Alloys Compd. 623, 374 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebrahimi, G.R., Keshmiri, H., Momeni, A., and Mazinani, M.: Dynamic recrystallization behavior of a superaustenitic stainless steel containing 16%Cr and 25%Ni. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528(25–26), 7488 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatemi-Varzaneh, S.M., Zarei-Hanzaki, A., and Beladi, H.: Dynamic recrystallization in AZ31 magnesium alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 456(1–2), 52 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poelt, P., Sommitsch, C., Mitsche, S., and Walter, M.: Dynamic recrystallization of Ni-base alloys—Experimental results and comparisons with simulations. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 420(1–2), 306 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Z., Liu, L., and Yang, H.: Microstructure evolution of different loading zones during TA15 alloy multi-cycle isothermal local forging. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528(15), 5112 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyed Salehi, M. and Serajzadeh, S.: A neural network model for prediction of static recrystallization kinetics under non-isothermal conditions. Comput. Mater. Sci. 49(4), 773 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R., Preuss, M., Hardy, M., and Tin, S.: Influence of composition and cooling rate on constrained and unconstrained lattice parameters in advanced polycrystalline nickel–base superalloys. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 423(1), 282 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belyakov, A., Tsuzaki, K., Miura, H., and Sakai, T.: Effect of initial microstructures on grain refinement in a stainless steel by large strain deformation. Acta Mater. 51(3), 847 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQueen, H.J.: Development of dynamic recrystallization theory. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 387389, 203 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourdet, S. and Montheillet, F.: An experimental study of the recrystallization mechanism during hot deformation of aluminium. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 283(1–2), 274 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Q., Li, D., Guo, S., Peng, H., and Hu, J.: The effect of deformation temperature on the microstructure evolution of Inconel 625 superalloy. J. Nucl. Mater. 414(3), 440 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Shao, W.Z., Zhen, L., and Zhang, X.M.: Microstructure evolution during dynamic recrystallization of hot deformed superalloy 718. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 486(1–2), 321 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Q., Li, D., and Guo, S.: Microstructural models of dynamic recrystallization in hot-deformed Inconel 625 superalloy. Mater. Manuf. Processes 27(9), 990 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, D., Xiong, L., Liu, W., Sun, G., and Yao, M.: Development of processing maps for a Ni-based superalloy. Mater. Charact. 58(10), 941 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J. and Wang, H.M.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of rapid directionally solidified Ni-base superalloy Rene′41 by laser melting deposition manufacturing. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 527(18–19), 4823 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollett, A., Humphreys, F., Rohrer, G.S., and Hatherly, M.: Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena (Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 2004).Google Scholar
Chen, X-M., Lin, Y.C., Wen, D-X., Zhang, J-L., and He, M.: Dynamic recrystallization behavior of a typical nickel-based superalloy during hot deformation. Mater. Des. 57, 568 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, B.L.: Orientation imaging microscopy: Application to the measurement of grain boundary structure. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 166(1–2), 59 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, J., Zhang, K., and Lu, Z.: Dynamic recrystallization kinetics of a powder metallurgy Ti–22Al–25Nb alloy during hot compression. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 607, 630 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottstein, G.: Annealing texture development by multiple twinning in f.c.c. crystals. Acta Metall. 32(7), 1117 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahajan, S., Pande, C.S., Imam, M.A., and Rath, B.B.: Formation of annealing twins in f.c.c. crystals. Acta Mater. 45(6), 2633 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Shao, W.Z., Zhen, L., Yang, L., and Zhang, X.M.: Flow behavior and microstructures of superalloy 718 during high temperature deformation. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 497(1–2), 479 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, D., Guo, Q., Guo, S., Peng, H., and Wu, Z.: The microstructure evolution and nucleation mechanisms of dynamic recrystallization in hot-deformed Inconel 625 superalloy. Mater. Des. 32(2), 696 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponge, D. and Gottstein, G.: Necklace formation during dynamic recrystallization: Mechanisms and impact on flow behavior. Acta Mater. 46(1), 69 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbert, C.A.C. and McQueen, H.J.: Dynamic recrystallization of A2 and M2 tool steels. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 313(1–2), 104 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Q., Li, D., Peng, H., Guo, S., Hu, J., and Du, P.: Nucleation mechanisms of dynamic recrystallization in Inconel 625 superalloy deformed with different strain rates. Rare Met. 31(3), 215 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balasubrahmanyam, V.V. and Prasad, Y.V.R.K.: Deformation behaviour of beta titanium alloy Ti–10V–4.5Fe–1.5Al in hot upset forging. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 336(1–2), 150 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y.C., Chen, X-M., Wen, D-X., and Chen, M-S.: A physically-based constitutive model for a typical nickel-based superalloy. Comput. Mater. Sci. 83, 282 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laasraoui, A. and Jonas, J.: Prediction of steel flow stresses at high temperatures and strain rates. Metall. Trans. A 22(7), 1545 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M-S., Lin, Y.C., and Ma, X-S.: The kinetics of dynamic recrystallization of 42CrMo steel. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 556, 260 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y.G., Li, M.Q., and Luo, J.: The modelling of dynamic recrystallization in the isothermal compression of 300M steel. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 574, 1 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar