Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T15:28:33.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of tensile stress on the annealed structure of a metallic glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

P. T. Vianco
Affiliation:
Materials Science Program, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627
J. C. M. Li
Affiliation:
Materials Science Program, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627
Get access

Abstract

The low-temperature (120°–245°C) structural relaxation of Metglas¯ 2826B (Ni49Fe29P14B6Si2) amorphous alloy was investigated for samples subjected to a tensile stress in the range of 20–400 MPa during annealing. The stress-annealed samples demonstrated a much smaller increase of microhardness than was observed in similarly annealed ribbons without a stress. Further heat treatment of the stress-annealed specimens, this time without the stress, was capable of increasing the microhardnesses of only some ribbons to values equal to those of samples similarly heat treated initially without a stress. An additional exothermic peak in the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms of the stress-annealed specimens indicated the presence of a more disordered structure at room temperature, which was found to correlate with the lower microhardness values. Otherwise, those artifacts of the DSC thermograms that were characteristic of samples annealed without a stress were still present in the stress-annealed ribbons. No effect on the crystallization temperature was noted but the glass transition temperature was increased in the stress-annealed case with respect to values attained when the stress was absent during heat treatment. A reduction in the degree of embrittlement of those samples annealed with a tensile stress was a further indication of more disorder in the stress-annealed ribbons.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Chen, H., Rep. Prog. Phys. 43, 353 (1980).Google Scholar
2Li, J. C. M., Treatise on Materials Science and Technology, edited by Herman, H. (Academic, New York, 1981), p. 325.Google Scholar
3Li, J. C. M., Chemistry and Physics of Rapidly Solidified Materials, edited by Berkowitz, B. and Scattergood, R. (TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1983), p. 173.Google Scholar
4Nielson, O., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 36, 81 (1983).Google Scholar
5Egami, T., Flanders, P., and Graham, D. Jr., AIP Conf. Proc. 24, 697 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Stubicar, M., J. Mater. Sci. 14, 1245 (1979).Google Scholar
7Mott, B., Microindentation Hardness Testing (Butterworths, London, 1956), p. 174.Google Scholar
8Chen, H. and Lo, C., in the Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Rapidly Quenched Metals, edited by Grant, N. and Giessen, B. (MIT, Boston, 1976), p. 413.Google Scholar
9Egami, T., J. Mater. Sci. 13, 2587 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Kursumovic, A., Cahn, R., and Scott, M., Scr. Metall. 14, 1245 (1980).Google Scholar
11Girt, E., Tomic, P., Mihac, T., and Kursumovic, A., Scr. Metall. 16, 693 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Chen, H. and Inoue, A., Mater. Sci. Eng. 20, 2417 (1985).Google Scholar
13Zielinski, P. and Ast, D., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 61–62, 1021 (1984).Google Scholar
14Luborsky, F. and Walter, J., J. Appl. Phys. 47, 3648 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15O'Handely, R., Corb, B., Megusar, J., and Grant, N., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 61–62, 773 (1984).Google Scholar
16Walter, J., Bartram, S., and Mella, I., Mater. Sci. Eng. 36, 193 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Turnbull, D. and Cohen, M., J. Chem. Phys. 34, 120 (1961).Google Scholar