Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T04:48:11.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of milling brominated P-100 graphite fibers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

James R. Gaier
Affiliation:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44135
Michael E. Dillehay
Affiliation:
Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio 44115
Paul D. Hambourger
Affiliation:
Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio 44115
Get access

Abstract

Preliminary procedures have been developed for the ball milling of pristine and brominated P-100 graphite fibers. Because of the lubricative properties of graphite, large ball loads (50% by volume) are required. Use of 2-propanol as a milling medium enhances the efficiency of the process. The fibers, when allowed to settle from the milling medium, tend to be preferentially aligned with rather few fibers standing up. Milled, brominated P-100 fibers have resistivities that are indistinguishable from their pristine counterparts, apparently because of loss of bromine. This suggests that bromine would not be the intercalate of choice in applications where milled fibers of this type are required. It was found that brominated graphite fibers are stable in a wide variety of organic solvents.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Gaier, J. R. and Jaworske, D. A., Syn. Met. 12, 525 (1985).Google Scholar
2Jaworske, D. A., Vannucci, R. D., and Zinolabedini, R., J. Compos. Mater, (to be published).Google Scholar
3Rose, H. E. and Sullivan, R. M. E., A Treatise on the InternalMechanics of Ball, Tube and Rod Milk (Chemical, New York, 1958).Google Scholar
4Dillahay, M. E. and Gaier, J. R., NASA Report No. TM-88828, 1986.Google Scholar
5Gaier, J. R., NASA Report No. TM-86859, 1984.Google Scholar
6Gaier, J. R. and Marino, D., in 17th Biennial Conference on Carbon, Extended Abstracts and Program (American Carbon Society, St. Marys, PA, 1985), pp. 80, 81; the complete report is NASA Report No. TM-87016, 1985.Google Scholar
7Hung, C. C., in Ref. 6, pp. 82, 83; the complete report is NASA Report No. TM-87026, 1984.Google Scholar
8CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (The Chemical Rubber Company, Cleveland, 1970), 51st ed.Google Scholar
9Hambourger, P. D., Boyer, R. A., Paulin, S. E., Jaworske, D. A., and Centanni, M. A., in the Extended Abstracts of the Symposium on Graphite Intercalation Compounds (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1986), p. 206.Google Scholar
10Jaworske, D. A., in Ref. 6, pp. 77, 78; the complete report is NASA Report No. TM-87015, 1985.Google Scholar
11Xian, X. W., Solin, S. A., and Gaier, J. R., Phys. Rev. B 17, 2436 (1987).Google Scholar