Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T03:26:51.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental evidence for space charge segregation in Nb-doped BaTiO3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Seok Hyun Yoon*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science & Engineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
Hwan Kim
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science & Engineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mial: maniacaa@gong.snu.ac.kr
Get access

Abstract

There is ample experimental evidence demonstrating space charge segregation in acceptor-doped BaTiO3. However there is still some controversy regarding donor-doped BaTiO3. Considering the space charge segregation theory in BaTiO3, the calculated driving force for space charge segregation is larger in acceptor-doped cases than in donor-doped cases. This result explains why acceptor segregation can be easily detected. However, a significant concentration of donors can also cause donor segregation. In donor and acceptor codoped BaTiO3, the grain sizes are very small, and donor segregation can be detected for compositions inducing a large space charge potential. In addition, in compositions that induced a small space charge potential, the grain sizes are very large, and donor segregation is not detected, although the total doping concentration is larger. This phenomenon means that donor segregation is caused by the space charge potential rather than misfit strain energy.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Chiang, Y.M. and Takagi, T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 3278 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Horvath, G., Gerblinger, J., Meixner, H., and Giber, J., Sens. Act. B32, 93 (1996).Google Scholar
3.Desu, S.B. and Payne, D.A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 3398 (1990).Google Scholar
4.Wilcox, N., Ravikumar, V., Rodrigues, R.P., Dravid, V.P., Vollmann, M., Waser, R., Soni, K.K., and Adriaens, A.G., Solid State Ionics 75, 127 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Woonbumroong, A., Brown, P.D., and Boothroyd, C.B., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 153, (Electron Microscopy and Analysis) 507 (1997).Google Scholar
6.Jida, S., Suemasu, T., and Miki, T., J. Appl. Phys. 86, 2089 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Peng, C.J. and Chiang, Y.M., J. Mater. Res. 5, 1237 (1990).Google Scholar
8.Yoon, S.H. and Kim, H., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 38, Part 1, No. 8, 4824 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Yoon, S.H., Lee, K.H., and Kim, H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 83, 2463 (2000).Google Scholar
10.Drofenik, M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70, 311 (1987).Google Scholar
11.McLean, D., Grain Boundaries in Metals (Clarendon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1976).Google Scholar
12.Kahn, M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 54, 455 (1971).Google Scholar
13.Nagai, T., Iijima, K., Hwang, H.J., Sando, M., Sekino, T., and Niihara, K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 83, 107 (2000).Google Scholar
14.Lu, H.Y., Bow, J.S., and Deng, W.H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 3562 (1990).Google Scholar
15.Chiang, Y.M., Wang, H., and Lee, J.R., J. Microscopy 191, Pt3, 275 (1998).Google Scholar