Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T21:55:13.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Finite size corrections for the Johnson–Mehl–Avrami–Kolmogorov equation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

L. E. Levine ,
K. Lakshmi Narayan  and
K. F. Kelton
L. E. Levine
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130
K. Lakshmi Narayan
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130
K. F. Kelton
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130
Get access

Abstract

The Johnson–Mehl–Avrami–Kolmogorov (JMAK) equation is frequently used to describe phase transformations involving nucleation and growth. The assumptions used in the derivation of this equation, however, are frequently violated when making experimental measurements; use of the JMAK equation for analyzing such data can often produce invalid results. Finite-size effects are among the most serious of these problems. We present modified analytic JMAK equations that correct for the finite-size effects and are roughly independent of both the sample shape and the shape of the growing nuclei. A comparison with computer simulations shows that these modified JMAK equations accurately reproduce the growth behavior over a wide range of conditions.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 124 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Kolmogorov, A. N., Isz. Akad. Nauk SSR, Ser. Fiz. 3, 355 (1937).Google Scholar
2.Johnson, W. A. and Mehl, R., Trans. AIME 135, 416 (1939).Google Scholar
3.Avrami, M., J. Chem. Phys. 7, 1103 (1939).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Avrami, M., J. Chem. Phys. 8, 212 (1940).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Avrami, M., J. Chem. Phys. 9, 177 (1941).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Wert, C. and Zener, C., J. Appl. Phys. 21, 5 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Cahn, J. W., Acta Metall. 4, 449 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kelton, K. F. and Spaepen, F., Acta Metall. 33, 455 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Zanotto, E. D. and Galhardi, A. C., Anais do VI CBECI-MAT, T-7, PUC/RJ, December 1984, p. 30.Google Scholar
10.Weinberg, M. C., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 82, 779 (1987).Google Scholar
11.Weinberg, M. C., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 202, 290 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Holzer, J. C. and Kelton, K. F., Acta Metall. Mater. 39, 1833 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Yinnon, H. and Uhlmann, D. R., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 54, 253 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Kelton, K. F., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 163, 283 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Weinberg, M. C., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 142, 126 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Kelton, K. F., Narayan, K. Lakshmi, Cull, T. S., and Ray, C. S., J. Non-Cryst. Solids (in press).Google Scholar